Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No you don't have to pay them.  it is their scam which the Courts know about. There was a classic case a few years ago that decided that £100 was not a penalty because that company had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear of cars that overstayed etc because they were there to maximise the availability of car park spaces. As Starbucks was closed in your case, Met have no legitimate interest so their £100 charge IS a penalty. Therefore the case would be thrown out. if they took you to Court and you turned up in Court to defend yourself. So no you shouldn't pay.
    • Thank you as always. Okay, will contact Tesco and will ignore the appeal, and will let you know what happens. You guys are superheroes.
    • A former Tesla engineer is in a decade-long battle with the car company, owned by Elon Musk.View the full article
    • what isn't working out....one very small issue, the rest is going perfectly fine. stop doing your usually running around waving arms and screaming on my god oh my god...sorry too used to you LMM even if you cant hold down a new bank account all is not lost .  ive not seen any reports that monzo refuse people  so go with them. pers as i said id NOT be using any switch service, as there are debts you want to stop paying and get them defaulted BEFORE you ever think of poss might could should pay them. its only a handful of stuff like rent/ctax/ etc that you need DD for ive not used DD's in almost 30yrs now nor use Standing orders, i do it by BACS each month priority bills first (can take roof from over my head if not paid) there REST all get paid if/when i've had the money. 2 well 3 things id dump too or get cheaper. cable/sat tv - ££6PCM . which i will is internet/tv/landline ? from whom that is very expensive. mine is £27PCM for 100MPS Broadband etc all in. 3 tv licence... who cant tell you are watching live tv even if you dont.... mobile phone £27? - go over to giffgaff no contract and as cheap as £6PCM even with mobile data (but use your home wf-fi when indoors!!) no need to keep using @Username, everyone that posted gets an alert like you do if someone posts. dx  
    • Critall windows date back to the 1880s but their steel construction makes them vulnerable to damp.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Roxburge chasing bogus debt in old Nationwide Bank Account years closed


robbie73w
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4498 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a Nationwide account 5 years ago.

 

 

I have never used it and there is no money in it.

I moved address several times without notifying the bank.

 

 

Now 5 years on I have received a letter from Roxburghe.

No idea how they got my new address but they claim that I owe money from my old Nationwide account.

I have no details of the account anymore

 

 

I contacted Nationwide who have told me that the account lay untouched for 4 years

suddenly last year an attempt was made to set up a direct debit for £1000 per month to an account with Cheltnam and Gloucester.

 

 

The direct debit bounced and as a result has incurred charges over the course of a year to the sum of £320.

I have told them that it couldnt have been me as I dont live at the address anymore and I have no account details.

What should I do???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Work with Nationwide to try and sort it out. Ignore the tw*ts at Roxburghe. They are terminally stupid.

 

You might ask Nationwide why they are dealing with a company whose licence the OFT is in the process of revoking because of their appalling business practices? Does not reflect well on Nationwide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nationwide have told me to write them a letter explaining whats happened but they say i have to take it into a branch to get my signature verified and my letter stamped before they will accept it and investigate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nationwide have told me to write them a letter explaining whats happened but they say i have to take it into a branch to get my signature verified and my letter stamped before they will accept it and investigate

 

They are having a joke. Still if it gets things moving...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was very tempted to put something like that in my letter. I will go in the morning with my letter and await their response. I think its disgusting that an account which has never been touched in the last 5 years can suddenly accumulate charges. They told me on the phone this morning that it could just be a case of Cheltnam and Gloucester making a typo and asking for money from the wrong account :shock:. WTF....... How on earth does that then evolve into me being dragged through the courts for £320???? It could also be whoever is living at my old address trying their luck to see if they could get money from my old account. Either way im gobsmacked. I was just starting to get into the xmas spirit but this has put a real downer on things

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don’t let it get you down. This really should be simple to resolve. The issues seem clear, and Nationwide have some explaining to do. Don’t let them think they are doing you a favour by looking into it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right found what I was looking for - under OFT guidelines the Creditor (Nationwide) are responsible for the actions of their appointed agents (RoxBerks). We have used this before when Rox were harassing someone on behalf of NatWest. Complaint to Nationwide and quote this at them.

 

Creditor responsibility for third parties

 

1.9 If consumer credit licence holders choose to do business or continue to do business with third parties engaged in questionable fitness behaviour, then their own fitness will be called into question. Our aim is to ensure that creditors do not ignore the unfair practices of debt collectors, whether in-house or external, acting on their behalf. It is not for the OFT to specify in this guidance how choices about third party selection are made nor to advise on desired conduct between third parties. However, during any investigation in this respect, we would expect to see

 

that care had been taken in the selection process, complaints had been investigated and that firm action had been taken as appropriate. It would be unlikely that we would take action against a creditor who could demonstrate such action had been taken.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...ction-guidance

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

CD, it is called vicarious liability.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability

 

The OC is ultimately responsible for the actions of their chosen third party employee.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE!!!

 

Received a letter from Roxburghe today demanding imediate payment of £268????? This figure is not even the amount shown on my CRF or the amount that Nationwide told me was owing. I informed the young man on the phone that I would not be dealing with Roxburghe in any way shape or form as I do not recognise them as anyone I have ever had any dealings with. I also told him that I had sent letters to Nationwide Debt Control to inform them of my beliefs regarding this Debt. I also told him that I was awaiting a reply from Nationwide to tell me how they intend to investigate this and also that Roxburghe should be getting correspondence from Nationwide telling them to halt there actions until an investigation has been carried out to see where this supposed debt has came from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE!

 

I have recieved a letter from Nationwide Fraud Department. They have investigated the situation and can confirm that it was Cheltnham and Gloucesters mistake that has led to this fiasco. They have informed me that they have wiped all the charges and put the account to zero balance and have now closed the account. The fraud department have now passed it on to their lending control people to contact the credit reference companies and remove all entries they put on there. At no point have they apologised, absolutely shocking behaviour from a Building society. Does anyone have any idea how long I should give them to remove the entries on my expeian file. Its been about a week now and the entries are still on there. :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...