Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope you mean I try to help people stand up to bullying - and not do the bullying!   I'll assume it's a compliment!     Well - that sort of demonstrates that you've not understood my point and (perhaps?) haven't actually read the OP?   My point is that it is not the boyfriend (the supposed "owner" of the car park) who is posting, but his girlfriend who believes that he "owns" his car parking space.  Yes - it usually makes sense to believe that what the OP is posting is the truth, but in this case there is every reason to believe that there is a possibility that the OP might be mistaken about her boyfriend's ownership of the parking space, because...  well, how would she know for sure whether he does or not?  He might be boasting or lying or simply mistaken.  (My understanding is that many people who "own" flats are often under the mistaken apprehension that they "own" a parking space when they don't.  All the more reason then that somebody else other than the "owner" might be even more mistaken).   I suppose what I'm getting at is that I was a bit surprised that both you and dx100uk were able to give such definite and certain answers to the OP without exploring her situation a bit more fully and ensuring that she fully and correctly understood her boyfriend's rights in respect of the parking space in question.  I was simply concerned that without getting more information from the OP, then the replies given to her might prove to be less than useful.  I wouldn't want her to leave thinking that there was absolutely nothing to worry about and then find out there was because she'd been misadvised because she didn't understand whether her BF "owned" the space or not.   Of course, it may be that my concern here makes absolutely no difference to the answer that needs to be given to the OP because it doesn't matter whether her boyfriend actually "owns" the parking space or not, which is fine.  But sometimes I think it would be helpful to the OP (and other readers like myself) if some of these legal niceties could be spelled out rather than left unexplained.    
    • I've spoken to my son in law and because the gearbox can be very expensive to repair, he would prefer to reject the car.   The garage isn't going to charge storage at the moment.   I feel they have been mislead regarding the service history.   How difficult would it be to get the finance company on our side in rejecting the car and sending back to the dealer?
    • The first thing to say is that you better go ahead and refund the buyer because otherwise she will end up getting negative feedback as well. We will try and help you get your money back from Hermes. Have you made a formal claim through Hermes and have they formally declined you and giving you reasons why? Presumably the item was properly declared and properly valued when the delivery was booked. You don't say whether or not you took out their so-called insurance. Please start off by reading around the sub- forum focusing particularly on the Hermes threats. There are lots of them. Get to understand the principles in respect of the arguments – the insurance element, your third party rights despite the fact that you booked it through Packlink. Have a look at other people's experiences of having sued Hermes, the process of issuing the claim, the defence, the mediation and have a close look at the advice that we give about how to handle mediation. It's highly likely that you will have to issue claim papers so also read around to understand the steps you need to take to bring a small claim in the County Court. It's straightforward but understanding the steps will make you far more confident about what you are doing. Have you started a formal complaint against Hermes and Packlink?
    • Christmas Wonderland has been allowed to reopen because it sells real Christmas trees. View the full article
  • Our picks

PPM/gladstone claimform vanished windscreen PCN - West Gate Plaza West Brom. *** WON - CASE DISMISSED ***


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 958 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

On one of your NtK's (at least) there should be pictures (or the details of where you can go and look at pictures) of the vehicle that show the ticket on the windscreen. Without those, any claim that a NtD was issued is futile.

 

That would be the same as me saying "I put a ticket on your car, even if you didn't ever see it, please pay me £100". Without a picture to prove it a) would you pay me? And b) Would I have any rights to issue a claim against you?

 

The answers to both would be no, absolutely not.

 

It's exactly the same claim as these clowns are making! :wink:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yeah I try to view it before but it says something along the line of the case been passed to debt collector

So I can’t view it online anymore or should I call them and ask?

 

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
quote
Link to post
Share on other sites
Thye will have to produce it in their evidence bundle. If you have never received any of these documents then you say so in your witness statement.

I haven’t seen the NTD prove and on the NTK letter there was only two images showing my vehicle with date and time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

May I ask when is the latest I can send my witness statement?

My trial date is on Monday 09/04.

 

The direction given for the claim is to deliver the documents no later than 14 days before the hearing.

 

if I send it on Saturday 24th March with next day delivery postage,

they properly receive it on Monday 26th (which is the exact 14 days before hearing) because they don’t work on Sunday?!

 

or to be safe I should send it on Thursday 22nd March so they can recieve it on Friday 23rd ‘working day’?

 

I wanted to wait for Gladstone’s statement first but didn’t want to miss my deadline

Link to post
Share on other sites

the latter

 

you are a litigant in person [defending yourself]

you are given certain leeway.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I’m just working on my witness statement, I wanted some help with how to word: that the driver has only overstay by 9mins as there are no parking machine at the area, I think it is a reasonable time to have gone over.

 

Or I shouldn’t put anything like that on my statement?

 

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without trawling back through the thread....

 

Are you saying that, let's say there was a 3hr limit, that the driver was only there for 3hrs 9min?

 

If that is correct, take a copy of this document with you to court, and mention it by page & clause in your witness statement.

 

The term that you're looking for is on page 12. Clause 15. Specifically 15.2.

 

Drivers must be allowed a minimum period of 10 minutes to leave a site after a pre-paid or permitted period of parking has expired.

 

You'll notice that that says MUST, not might, maybe or should.

 

That alone will scupper any chance they have of making a successful claim in court. (although shouldn't be your only point made in your WS)

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be exact is 12mins, they issued the PCN at 22:11pm which is 9 mins overstay but evidence images show the car still there at 22:14pm but the vehicle is running. I thought this act only apply to public road with certain conditions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The images of the car still on site don't matter. They issued the PCN at paid time +9 minutes. They've shot themselves in both feet!

 

Despite what the PPC's like to claim, "Parking" is not the same as the vehicle being "on site".

 

 

The document that I linked to is the IPC CoP for AOS members, of which PPM is one. They must comply, no matter how much they'd like to wiggle.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot!

You have put a strong point in for me as I was struggling to find a strong point for my statement... and my head was about to explode!

 

I'm just finalising the last bit of the statement, if you or other site team member can help to correct my wording, it will be greatly appreciated!!! Thanks!

Edited by dx100uk
quote/spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

As DF syas, there is a CoP that the have to adhere to or show that their system is equal or better to the CoP.

 

This is also covered in other court cases so have a look at the parking pranksters blog/web page and do a search for relevant cases.

there certainly is one from a few years back where the judge decided that 15 minutes all round to arrive, read signs, find change then get back into car, queue to exit etc is reasonable if using ANPR to determine overstay.

 

The contract is for PARKING, not visiting and this point need to be shoved down their throats

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

As you have not yet had sight of the Gladrags WS, I do not recommend that you post your WS in public. If Gladrags happen to see it (and we know that they look at the forums) it may give them a chance to tailor their own WS to counter any arguments that you make.

 

For now, I would suggest that your PM myself, dx100uk and ericsbrother (you can do so in one PM) so that we can look at it and suggest any edits or additional pointers. With a view to posting it here once you have received the copy & paste Roboclaim WS from Gladrags.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites
The images of the car still on site don't matter. They issued the PCN at paid time +9 minutes. They've shot themselves in both feet!

 

Despite what the PPC's like to claim, "Parking" is not the same as the vehicle being "on site".

 

 

The document that I linked to is the IPC CoP for AOS members, of which PPM is one. They must comply, no matter how much they'd like to wiggle.

 

But actually I just read para 15.3 'The reference to 10 minutes in 15.2 above shall not apply where the period of pre-paid or permitted parking does not exceed 1 hour providing that the signage on the site makes it clear to the motorist, in prominent font, that no grace period applies on that land.'

Does that mean only if PPM has state on their the signage 'that no grace period applies on that land' otherwise the 10 mins grace period will still need apply to them because the parking condition is 1 hour max? And no such say about grace period on their signage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It means that if you paid for 1 hours parking AND the signs say, words to the effect of "No grace period applies".

 

If however you paid for 1½hrs parking, the sign might still say "No grace period applies", but it does as per 15.2 as 15.3 does not exclude it.

 

Sometimes you need to read these things as looking for what they don't say, rather than what they do :wink:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it really doesnt matter what the sign says it has been determined by case law that the grace period exists so that it that.

 

I can put up a sign saying trespassers will be eaten by my big dog but that doesnt make it legal to set dogs on trespassers because there is already applicable law in that regard

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have PM my WS, please check.

 

also another question, if I print out the IPC CoP/ POFA 2012 do I need to attach it with the WS bundle and give it to all parties or I can just take the copy with me in case the judge want to see it?

Link to post
Share on other sites
also another question, if I print out the IPC CoP/ POFA 2012 do I need to attach it with the WS bundle and give it to all parties or I can just take the copy with me in case the judge want to see it?

 

Print out the relevant sections only, 3 copies just to be sure. 1 for you to refer to, 1 for the judge and 1 for whichever poor sod gets the short straw of representing for Gladrags that day. More on that in my PM shortly.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a redacted copy of the Gladrags WS which Kikic has received via email.

 

I will leave Kikic to post up their final WS when they return to the thread.

Bundle the approved, signed statement with the exhibits (Edited).pdf

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this another certified Roboclaim, with Beavis as the only authority, it is woeful.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's up to the usual Gladrags standard. P... Poor.

 

But you know, they're the best in the business don't you? It must be true, they've said so themselves :lol:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Soon will be my trial day!!

Anything else I should prepare?

I will bring my WS package including evidence and relevant Clause that I intend to rely on,

a copy of lay representative order 1999,

legal services act 2007,

copy or case Ellis v Larson,

copies of parking CoP bill.

 

I searched online am I suppose to write some kind of opening speech/ speaking’ speech?

 

Or I can just read out what I wrote in my WS? And what kind of questions do I need to ask?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the judge will lead you.

 

do NOT ever allow a little 'chat' outside with whatever clown the send to rep them.

 

and remember if they are NOT the person whom signed their WS they have no rights to state anything

I think EB has already explained that here?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...