Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capital One - PPI help **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2388 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Not been here for a while but wanted to ask for some help.

 

Recently I went down the route of doing a PPI claim via Resolver with Capital One and I was sent a letter confirming I had previously had PPI and they were investigating.

 

Today, I received a letter from them outlining their decision and why.

 

The document they have sent me is 4 pages long and they have said that I ticked a box for PPI when I signed up for the card, I never did, I specifically recall having to call a number to activate my card and on I went to spend a few quid.

 

I do recall seeing the payments on my card statement and to be fair, I never put two and two together and just left it, assuming it would be a good idea to have it.

 

I'm happy to post up a copy of the pages tomorrow for you to look through, if someone would be kind enough, I know you guys really helped us last time.

 

They are stating something about a case Plevin v Paragon.

I've had a look on google but it seems a bit mind boggling to be honest.

 

They (Capital One) claim a decision is to be made by the end of August 17 and my case would be "automatically reviewed" but after coming back here and seeing numerous posts about Capital One and the claims process I am seriously doubting the document and would really appreciate the help of the geniuses here that helped us previously.

 

Would be grateful if someone could advise on what to do next,

I'm sure I am on a timescale and I know I never ticked a box and I am almost 100% sure that when I applied for the card it was online / via phone.

I've never applied for a card via post, ever.

 

The card was taken out 2000 and cancelled 2004.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capital one know full well that it was done over the phone and you were conned

 

Loads of threads here on the little white sticker on card that said "ring this number to activate"

Funny thing is the card was already active

And it was to do with activating the the card protection

 

Sar them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you've no details yet

sorry but resolver is useless in doing PPI reclaim

as its simply a speculative letter and you'll get a fob off

as you've no data to back up your claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Capital One returned no such information they claimed on their decision letter.

 

I then approached Financial Ombudsman and a few minutes ago received a letter that the adjudicator has upheld my complaint and Capital One are going to make me an offer of compensation.

 

I don't know what it will be yet so have to wait for that but it's looking positive. There is just a part of me that is extremely annoyed that they (Cap One) tried to get rid of me with a letter with what really was lies.

 

I'll update again once I know, they suggest up to 8 weeks though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I just wanted to pop back and let everyone know how this has gone.

 

Since the CapitalOne claim I did, I have had 3 others as well and for the benefit of anyone else asking same or similar questions.

 

I used Resolver (I know DX100UK said it wasn't the best) but after doing the CapitalOne claim I tried others but added a lot more information. I have now had successful payouts from Natwest (who were by far the easiest to deal with and actually, didn't argue). £5670.

 

CapitalOne are now paying out, cheque should be with me in a few days - £423.00 it does include a few pence over but just rounding to the nearest pound.

 

The Associates (CITI) - awful trying to deal with them, but they have admitted liability for £1150.

 

CapitalOne and Associates (CITI) were referred to the FoS and they upheld my complaint.

 

I know that this group does great work with helping people and we are so grateful and will be making a donation in the next wee while.

 

Thank you kindly to everyone here and I wish everyone a Merry Christmas (early) as I hope to not be back before then - in the nicest possible way.

 

Spacedood. :whoo:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the update spacedood and well done on getting some cash back, my Cap 1 claim is still with the Ombudsman, it's been a nightmare.

I also eventually got my cash back from the Associates (Citi).

 

Have a good Christmas when it comes.

 

:thumb:

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2388 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...