Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1 Date of the infringement 14th May 2024 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 14th May 2024 3 Date received 27th May 2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? APCOA Parking (UK) Ltd 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Hove Railway Station For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Unsure  Received this after payment failed to go through on the app. This has happened before and I don't really want to have to pay these parasites again. I have not appealed or had any contact since receiving this notice but the payment period runs out in a few days and wanted to know the best plan of action.  Many thanks! edited_Parking Ticket - Copy.pdf
    • One last query, the works have already been agreed to by ourselves as we have had no choice and should be completed today. So should this paragraph be requesting payment rather than asking from them to agree to commence works?    Also, we currently have a courtesy car provided by Mercedes which will be required back when we collect the car so I don’t think we’ll need to be requesting a courtesy car from Doves, unless they want the car back to review themselves? 
    • No HB, I dont think they are currently. Just different figureheads - and I'm not that sure about the second part. Half the Tory cabinet are hard right/poopulists and many of the Tory doners   Oh - and why are people talking about the 'extinction of the Tory party with 20% of the vote and 70-90 seats .. But the rise of the Reform party with a media driven 11% of the vote and - 4 seats being seen as an outside chance epic victory?   I'll bet if there were a kkk party in the UK it would do similarly to the reform core vote and split the hard right vote The Uk is very clanish - and consider themeselves tory or labour or whatever - although the extreme parties now do seem to be cracking that edifice somewhat - I hope
    • I'm not sure I follow, TJ. They're still with different parties, aren't they?
    • Well farage is just a Johnson number two isn't he .. (or johnson is a farage number two?) so you can understand their confusion   Has farage got a clacton home yet? Even an airBnB or a beach hut? No? No surprises there then eh?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

VCS PCN now DCA - ticket ref comes back with nothing

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2469 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Hi all,


First time here so please let me know if anything in this post should be changed.



I was in Bulgaria on business in June/July and had no knowledge of my PCN before leaving (turns out my mate moved my car out of his drive into the parking area for a couple hours where I received this PCN).


Upon arriving home I find two letters,

one being a final reminder sent mid June by VCS

and then a debt collection notice sent by ZZPS in mid July.


As I was out of the country and couldn't access my mail,

I had no idea any of this was happening in my absence

and had no chance to appeal the ticket in the allotted 28 days.


The ticket was for £100, to be reduced to £60 if paid within two weeks and is now at £160 due to the debt collection agency add on.


I haven't received any other letters regarding this claim.


What I've tried:

I have tried to go through the various appeals process,

but when searching my ticket ref on the provided websites (namely myparkingcharge.co.uk as noted at the bottom of the VCS letter and the IPC website itself) it comes back with nothing,

meaning that I couldn't have appealed it regardless.


I even tried POPLA, and they can't find the ticket either.


After contacting an ombudsman, they suggested to complain through the companies.

VCS said that it was to go through ZZPS as they now were in charge of the debt


, ZZPS replied as follows:


"We must inform you that you have now passed the time frame in which an appeal can be made as appeals can only be made within 28 days of the Parking Charge Notice being issued, our client maintains that all correspondence received has been actioned accordingly and that the correct procedure has been followed.



The balance of £160.00 remains payable on our systems, please refer to the back of our letter for the payment options available to you. In the absence of payment this matter will be referred to solicitors to resolve and further fees may be incurred."


What do I do?

If none of the appeals agencies even agree that the reference number matches any ticket, has a ticket even been issued against me?


The collectors are refusing to provide evidence.

I am not exactly inclined to pay this "debt" until the relevant parties prove their claim.

Any advice would be appreciated as I feel like I'm about to get strong armed out of £160


Attached are the letters received, along with the website response when I search the reference. Personal info along with refs blacked out for obvious reasons.




Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG. The parking forum regulars should be along later with advice for you.


My first thought is that if ZZPS are involved, you're heading towards the end of the road. If you search the forum, there are lots of threads about ZZPS and I'm pretty sure that nobody has paid. Please wait for the guys to arrive, they can tell you more.


Best, HB

  • Confused 1

Illegitimi non carborundum




Link to post
Share on other sites

What date was the offence?

DCA's are not bailiffs

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you upload as PDF please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't worry about it. It will never stand up in Court because under POFA S4 [5] only the sum stated in the NTK can be claimed. So the Notice Board contains an unlawful statement when it says that their Debt collector can add £60 to the charge. That makes the whole contract void.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi again,


Unfortunately this has once again reared it's ugly head

- I have now received a letter from the illustrious offices of Wright and Hassall, acting as solicitors in this case.


They are threatening court action through CCJ on behalf of ZZPS,

any advice on how to proceed would be greatly appreciated.



It's worth noting that although the letter is dated 18.08.17, I received it on 4.9.17 - not entirely sure why.


I have attached the letter with identifying information redacted, should I respond or wait for a court summons?

Many thanks


Link to post
Share on other sites

how many times does it say MAY???




they cant do court for ZZPS

read it properly

only the PPC can take you to court not some powerless DCA or their supposed solicitor

its actually all come from the same printer in the same porta cabin.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All DCA's and their tame sols play on a debtors lack of knowledge, you're not the first, and you certainly won't be the last.


It's usually when those of us are backed into a corner and feeling conned, do we then research our rights and any laws surrounding our circumstances.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!



Link to post
Share on other sites

it is not just a parking matter

, it is knowing a bit about the rights or lack of them when it comes to people writing letters on someone else's behalf


. If Sid owes you £50

I cant sue Sid to force him to pay me so I can give you the money if I feel like it.


I can write to Sid on your behalf but I have no interest in the debt so he doesn't have to take the slightest bit of notice to anything I say and certainly wont owe me any money.


That should also answer any questions about the legality of adding £60 admin fees for their letter.


Sid hasn't agreed to pay me anything when you lent him the £50 and the same applies here

The same is true for right hassle and ZZPS.


Neither of them have any interest so RH telling you to pay ZZPS is utterly stupid

, if you wished to waste your life and a good few stamps you could ask them about this contractual relationship and how their scribbles fit in with contract law as you are doing 'A' level law and don't want to fail just because you copied their twaddle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...