Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capquest and 17 year old Liverpool Victoria debt, help appreciated


Roxy201788
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2452 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

I'm new to the forum and this is my first post.

 

Today,

I have decided to take action with 2 old Liverpool Victoria debts,

one was a personal loan taken out in the end of 1999 or early 2000 for 10k over 5 years.

 

 

This was defaulted on around 2002 and payment arrangements made with Liverpool Victoria, then sold to Capquest July 2009.

 

 

I have been paying £12.00 per month by direct debit for years at least since before the debt was sold

Capquest have been adding on large sums of interest and charges, my debt continues to grow.

I believe that I read somewhere on this forum that interest and charges can't be added after the length of the original agreement.

 

The second was for a LiverPool Victoria Credit Card, same story as above but the debt when sold was £2945.27.

 

I'm not sure that PPI was claimed for the credit card i know that it wasn't taken out for the loan

- should i send a PPI request to Liverpool Victoria to start with?

 

I haven't received an annual statement from Capquest since October 2012

and have had no dealings with them since the debt was sold and the direct debit was set up.

They haven't even bothered to ask for an increase

and now I'm inclined to think that's because they don't want to rock the boat.,

 

I am scared of dealing with them as they added a second default for the same debt to my credit file years ago and despite sending off the evidence off the the Credit companies and the Ombudsman it wasn't removed and my credit file is perfect now.

 

I now that it's not statue barred as I have been making payments,

surely they can't me to court for a 17 year old debt,

after spending the afternoon reading some threads on here,

i'm beginning to think there is no paperwork to back up these debts

and the loan was agreed over the telephone,

I do remember that.

 

I'm assuming I CCA request Capquest first

have only been learning information from the site today,

any help and advice would be appreciated on these two debts.

 

Thanks for reading, i hope it's all clear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep on reading the site to improve your understanding. You are doing pretty well so far.

 

Yes, send CCA requests to everyone and also if you suspect any PPI – even if you don't, then send SARs to get previous statements to see if there are any payments there.

I expect that our team member DX will be along soon and will give you more detailed advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA request first and foremost, ensure you get ''proof of posting'' which is free from the PO counter.

 

You're being mugged off, and are what is know as a Cash cow, the reason why they're not contacting you is because they know you're easy pickings and will pay forever.

 

IMO, I'd stop paying now all together, they've had more than their fare share of profit out of you.

 

At the VERY LEAST you need to cancel those direct debits, if you want to continue paying them, then set up a standing order, this will stop them emptying your account.

 

Seriously consider stopping paying them anything.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's great news and made me more determined to sort this matter out.

 

A quick question, I'm not sure if these debts were in my originally in my single name or married name, the deed of assignment is in my married name but I haven ow reverted back to my single name-I'm assuming legally I should use my maiden name for the CCA's and SAR's?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bazooka Boo, for your input,

after looking at this site I sort of realised why they hadn't been in touch - easy target!

 

 

Do I send the letters to Capquest or Capquest and Liverpool Victoria or both?

Sorry Just clicked on the link it's Capquest.

 

I will post the letters tomorrow and make sure I get proof of posting.

Edited by Roxy201788
Failed to read the link!
Link to post
Share on other sites

I called Liverpool Victoria to discuss my payment due to a change of circumstances and they advised me and also sent me a letter for both debts confirming this. I also had a letter from Capquest confirming but haven't found this yet, I do have another pile of paperwork to go through but I know that I wouldn't have binned it, so it must be somewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well a ''Deed of assignment'' is a confidential document, between two corporations which you won't get sight of.

 

They probably mean 'Notice of assignment' which to be honest isn't worth bothering about.

 

CCA requests, and STOPPING payments to these vultures is your priority!

 

I dread to think how many hundreds of pounds you've wasted paying these chancers.

 

Stay OFF the phone, if they ring, laugh and hang up.

 

Whoever is chasing you, or whoever it is you're paying now, send them the CCA request, enclose the £1 postal order, BUT ensure you leave it blank.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. They haven't got my phone number or correct address yet as I moved last year and I won't give them any phone numbers, as I still remember those threatening calls in the past from debt collectors.

 

Is there a reason that I don't put a payer on the Postal Order?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. They haven't got my phone number or correct address yet as I moved last year and I won't give them any phone numbers, as I still remember those threatening calls in the past from debt collectors.

 

Is there a reason that I don't put a payer on the Postal Order?

 

Once you request DSARs and CCA requests they will have your address...as they should otherwise they could issue a court claim to your previous address and you would not be able to defend it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there a reason that I don't put a payer on the Postal Order?

 

Yes , you leave it blank so they can fill it in, IF they have anyone that can write!

 

If you fill it in, then they simply return it saying it should be addressed to bill & ben, or some other, simply to frustrate the legal process.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...