Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Marston's final notice day before removal notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2458 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have an unpaid fine via magistrate court for driving offence.

 

I called the court in may to arrange an income/expense form but I never called back to complete it as I noticed an attachment of earnings coming from my wages which I thought out was for this fine. Turns out it's not and now I've had these two and delivered notes whilst I've been at work.

I can't pay if in one go, not a chance.

 

Any help of what to do greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

I should add that I didn't attend court nor plea via post as I work away a lot.

 

I haven't been means tested and I'm 99% sure I haven't had an enforcement notice.

I'm worse at what I do best and for this gift I feel blessed

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I haven't been means tested and I'm 99% sure I haven't had an enforcement notice.

 

Before addressing your query, can I just make a comment about your above statement as it may assist others reading the forum:

 

With the summons or Single Justice Procedure notice, you should also find attached a Form MC100 Statement of Means and other Financial Services (commonly called a Means Enquiry Form). This form asks for details of your income and other assets and every defendant who is prosecuted for an offence must complete the MC 100. I cannot emphasis enough the importance of completing this form (and even more so, if you are in receipt of benefits or a low income).

 

The information provided on the Statement of Means (MC100) will be used by the Magistrates when setting the level of the fine.

 

 

Relevant Weekly Income (RWI)

 

The amount of the fine will be calculated by the court as being a percentage of your “relevant weekly income” (RWI). This is calculated by the court using the information provided by you on the MC100 Statement of Means form. If your only income consists of state benefits, the court “assume” that the “relevant weekly income” (RWI) is £120 per week and the fine will be set at an affordable figure.

 

In for one reason for another, you fail to submit the MC100 Statement of Means, then the court can assume that your ‘relevant weekly income’ is £440 per week and the fine will be set at a percentage of this.

 

PS: I note from your post that you had not responded to the summons or enter a plea. If your 'relevant' weekly income is £440 per week or over, then not completing the Means Form would not have affected the level of fine imposed.

 

Almost certainly the fine has been set at a higher level that it should have been because you had failed to enter a 'plea'. If you had pleaded guilty, you would be entitled to a one third discount on the level of fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have an unpaid fine via magistrate court for driving offence.

 

I called the court in May to arrange an income/expense form but I never called back to complete it as I noticed an attachment of earnings coming from my wages which I thought out was for this fine. Turns out it's not and now I've had these two and delivered notes whilst I've been at work.

 

I can't pay if in one go, not a chance.

 

How many fines are currently outstanding?

 

How much are they for?

 

Has the fine that was subject to an Attachment of Earnings been cleared?

 

How many fines are Marston Holding enforcing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

After looking through my paperwork stash i have found a notice of enforcement from collectica (I assume this is Marston's too as on marston paperwork it as that name at the bottom too)

 

The final notice and the removal notice is for £310 more than the actual fine/notice of enforcement - fees I assume.

 

Guess I'm asking what i should do now

I'm worse at what I do best and for this gift I feel blessed

Link to post
Share on other sites

After looking through my paperwork stash i have found a notice of enforcement from collectica (I assume this is Marston's too as on marston paperwork it as that name at the bottom too)

 

The final notice and the removal notice is for £310 more than the actual fine/notice of enforcement - fees I assume.

 

Guess I'm asking what i should do now

 

If you read the Notice of Enforcement carefully, you will see that there will be a Compliance fee of £75. There will also be a date by when full payment must be made or a payment arrangement set up. What was the date of the NoE and what was the date when the compliance stage ended?

 

As you had not set up a payment arrangement by the date provided, a enforcement agent has made a personal visit. That visit is charged at £235 (which with the £75 Compliance fee totals £310).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The final notice and the removal notice were hand delivered (no stamp) a day apart.

 

The notice of enforcement was 05/07/2017

 

Enforcement details - says was a distress warrant 05/04/17

 

It says payment must be made by 23.59 on the 19/07/2017

I'm worse at what I do best and for this gift I feel blessed

Link to post
Share on other sites

The final notice and the removal notice were hand delivered (no stamp) a day apart.

 

The notice of enforcement was 05/07/2017

 

Enforcement details - says was a distress warrant 05/04/17

 

It says payment must be made by 23.59 on the 19/07/2017

 

Marston's are pretty good at giving a 14 day period to make payment before escalating to the enforcement stage.

 

The options that you have at present are very limited. There is no possibility of you applying to the court for a Section 14 Statutory Declaration.

 

Please do not be tempted to make payment to the Magistrates Court minus the bailiff fees as all that will happen, is that you will receive a letter from the court a few days after making payment advising that your payment has been forwarded to Marston's so that they can deduct their compliance fee of £75 and allocate the bailiff as per the regulations.

 

You have not mentioned how much Marston's are requesting?

 

I am assuming that you have a car. If it's value is over £1,350 it is at serious risk of being seized. Is you vehicle subject to finance etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fine is for £800 and marstons are asking for 1120

 

My car is worth a few hundred at most and I rent a furnished house so all types mine is clothes, bed and TV

I'm worse at what I do best and for this gift I feel blessed

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fine is for £800 and marstons are asking for 1120

 

My car is worth a few hundred at most and I rent a furnished house so all types mine is clothes, bed and TV

 

I have just been reading back at a previous thread of yours from last year regarding a court fine. I provided significant advice to you on that thread and I notice that the bailiff did eventually accept payment of 50% of the debt with the remainder slightly later.

 

I note that you work away a great deal of the time so rarely at home.

 

The fine is for a significant amount and it really is such a shame that you had kept your 'head in the sand'. The options available to you are the exact same as I had advised last year (which was to try to get a sensible payment agreement with the enforcement agent).

 

He would see from his records that you had previously paid an earlier fine last year so that should go very much in your favour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, the issue from last year is actually why the attachment of earnings is (although the company still sending me laters)

 

Can you explain a little more. In your previous thread, your posting finished after you had mentioned that the enforcement agent agreed to accept a payment of 50% of the amount due with the balance being paid at a later date. I am assuming from your post above that you did not make the payment and the account was then refereed for an Attachment of Earnings. Am I correct?

 

Is that attachment of earning still ongoing? If so, I am confused as to why you would still be receiving correspondence from Marston's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...