Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the one that is free for two hours? Which is well known for not having enough time for customers to do their shopping/browsing at this site. Ask HBC what planning permission they gave ECP regarding the time limits for parking.  
    • Quick update - they didn't show up so the judge dismissed their application. Having a beer now and wondering if they'll try again!
    • Journo Russell Scott has been looking at people who sold PPE to the Johnson government. https://twitter.com/RussellScott1/status/1780686322908487787  
    • It is important that you do the reading about this subject in the sub- forum. It's not complicated but you need to be in control and I don't think you are. For instance, much of the information you need and also the case transcripts that you're looking for are in the fixed topics at the top of this sub- forum but clearly you didn't know that. You will gain in confidence if you do the reading. Particularly as it now looks as if the mediation has not worked because EVRi have stayed you up and so you may now be going to trial. You need to understand thoroughly what you are doing. We will help you and you will find our support is unstinting but you have to do your part. Please spend a lot of time reading the stories on the sub- forum especially the pinned posts at the top of the sub- forum and then start preparing your court bundle. We have instructions here for everything
    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can Elderbridge use an SPO granted to Firstplus in June 2008 to now evict us in 2017??


dcb1965
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2465 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They want to Evict me,can you help.

 

Can someone please advise what I can do to stop Elderbridge (company that purchased from Barclays, all Firstplus accounts) evicting me from my house,

 

I have received a letter today from Elderbridge stating that they are instructing their solicitors (Eversheds) to ask the court to set a date for Elderbridge to take possession of my property.

 

What I want to know is if they can do this as the original repossession order was granted to Firstplus who have gone bust (and then taken on by Barclays as they were the bank that set up Firstplus)

 

 

Last year Barclays sold my outstanding account to Elderbridge,

does that mean that they automaticity have the right to use the suspended repossession order to start eviction process?

 

If yes how do I contact the courts to stop this eviction and make payments to this new company Elderbridge.

 

Account Balance £64,809.59

 

Arrears Balance £64,722.09

 

how can Firstplus, Barclays have let my arrears get so high and charge me 7.8% intrest,

I have asked all of the above to stop charging interest but have all refused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes..they can BUT its say INSTRUCTED not WILL!!

 

 

I can instruct my dog to sit

if it does is another matter!

 

 

why are you £64k in arrears!!

 

 

tell us the history please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This will be more info than you have asked for but gives full story

 

Reason for the arrears:

 

 

 

  1. loan taken out Jan 2006
  2. wife left mid 2006, arrears started build up from Aug 2006
  3. left with son at school and daughter at collage
  4. lost job May 2007
  5. Claimed 6 month PPI, until got a low paying job
  6. managed for a while could not manage after 1st year
  7. arrears quickly built up to £10800 by 13 may 2008
  8. First-plus took me to court got repossession order that was suspended in June 2008
  9. agreed to pay additional + main payment
  10. I continued paying until I lost my job December 2008
  11. waited for the repossession order to be used never used
  12. Had some one interested in buying my house in February 2009
  13. called first-plus to ask for a settlement figure and was told that they would not agree to the sale as I was in negative equity and would not pay the loan off
  14. I then decided that if first-plus would not let me sell it I would not pay loan and force them to use the suspended repossession order, but they never used it and that is how the arrears have built up since 2009
  15. I did have a an offer for someone to buy my house in 2016 and once again went to Barclays (as by then first-plus gone) and solicitor for purchaser told him to pull out as Barclays stated that not only was the principle amount due but also £54,000 of arrears and advised that would leave me in negative equity and could not buy.
  16. Since then I have just waited for Elderbrige to get in touch so I could have my day in court and tell a judge what has happened and ask if it is legal for them to allow my arrears to become more than my principle loan amount (pig headed)

 

 

So I know face the fact that I will have to pay the outstanding amount and agree to a monthly charge of some £900.00 to stop the eviction, I was just hoping that Elderbridge had to go back to court to get another repossession order, if not I will not have my day in court and will have to start making the payments until I pop off this mortal coil

Link to post
Share on other sites

no that's brill.

don't take my word for things though!

 

 

have you checked they are now listed on LR?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep land registry

if the charge is not in their name

stuff all they can do IMHO

what debt m'lud??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...