Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have a problem, a serious one. On mid November 2023 my boiler (installed 10/21) failed and flagged up the code 29.10: blocked flue. The EB engineer came out and replaced the fan, said it was unusual, put it down to storms. On 16/12/23 the same thing happened. Another WB engineer came 18/12/23 and fixed it, but said it isn't the boiler, it is the flue, and that he would mend it this time under the guarantee but they would not do that again if it failed unless I got the installers to reinstal it. On 27/12 it failed again. 29.10. I did not call them because of their saying I would have to pay. I contacted the installers who responded, then stopped when they saw the WB report of 18/12. By February I had had no central heating or hot water since Christmas, so I posted a job for a heating engineer to give an opinion on the flue installation. He found the flue blocked with vegetation from the trees my neighbour planted near the wall, and which I have been desperate to get uprooted. He gave a report and photos, and agreed the flue needed reinstalling. I got nothing from the original installers, so I contacted the Gas Safe Register. They sent an inspector, who gave a full report and had the original installers down and they reinstalled the flue as instructed, and notified LA Building Regulations.   On Friday I received a certificate from the Gas Register saying the reinstallation of the flue had  been carried out by a registered heating engineer.  It was from the installers, and the certificate does say that it is 'not conclusive evidence' and they had notified the local authority Building Regulations on my behalf.  As I only received it Friday, I have not yet pursued it. On Thursday, as the installers said they had reinstalled and there was nothing wrong with the flue installation, and that the boiler was not working, I wrote to WB and asked them to come and repair the boiler.   During all this time I have been in contact with various people, including Citizens Advice.  I had hoped they would refer it to the Trading Standards because you cannot contact Trading Standards yourself.  I am hoping they will.  I have other serious issues to deal with.  I don't think elderly people are helped as much as they should be.   I had an email from them Friday - yesterday - demanding I deposit £200 with them before they come down to repair it. I told them I query that, and said I will consult on my consumer rights, sending copies of that to all concerned. This is their response: Thank you for your email. The £200.00 is reserved to ensure the work has been completed correctly – in the case where remedial work has been resolved, no charge will be taken. This is due to the amount of calls we have reattended in the past where remedial work has been said to have been completed but hasn’t been. If the issues detailed in the report from our previous visit have been issued, the money will not process and will simply go from reserved back to the customers account without ever leaving it. Under our Terms and Conditions: 6.1 Assignment and Subcontracting. We may at any time and without any notice to you assign, transfer, charge, subcontract or deal in any other manner with all or any of our rights or obligations under these Terms. You may only transfer your rights or your obligations under these Terms to another person with our prior written consent, which we will not unreasonably withhold or delay. Please refer to our website for full terms and conditions." Can they demand the money up front like this?   It is a week's state pension.  Would anyone give a whole week's pay for something which should be under guarantee?  I can copy and paste the various reports I have had from Worcester Bosch, including the one of 10/2021 when it was installed and failed 24 hours later.  The boiler worked until November 2023.  Also, I cannot understand the terms and conditions, because the boiler was given under the ECO3 scheme.  I have been on disability benefit - DLA - since 1992 and I don't remember signing anything with Worcester Bosch.  I am not sure if I am allowed to attach all the correspondence here.  It will take time, because the page keeps being unresponsive and I have to keep clicking 'wait'
    • for how many weeks/months/years have you been using it twice a week for...roughly?   she will have to request a new card, it wont be reissued or sent back to her if it was retained by the inspector.  
    • Liz Truss says Tories are part of a Blairite attempt to silence her. Reform UK leader Richard Tice said the Conservative Party is 'socialist' and suggested Rishi Sunak is not a 'real conservative'.   .. says the definitely NOT real Conservatives   Lets also hope that Starmer implements a clause where bringing the UK into disrepute, or breaching the requirements of ex UK PMs results in the permanent withdrawal of ALL UK taxpayer funding of them    
    • let 'em get on with it. they nor you have actually read what consequences under CONC mentioned in our SB letter mean under the law. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Second hand car, large deposit and finance - major faults - short term reject 3 days

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2462 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Hi All,


A friend of mine is having a problem that I'm helping with.


He purchased a secondhand Mercedes sports car for £26,000 from what he considered a reputable car dealer (not main dealer)it was delivered Thursday 13th July 2017.


They are FCA regulated (Ref No 658267 ) and a representative of (MBI) Limited (Ref No 312143)


He paid £10,000 deposit cash and the rest on finance with Close, the first day he noticed problems which were reported the second day, he thought there were gearbox problems and noticed the active intelligent lights were not working.


He was asked not to drive the car and either get it brought back or taken to a local garage to see the problem, he managed to get it into a Mercedes specialist on the next day - there was a 9 page faults list including electronics, possible not Mercedes front lights and engine misfiring on some cylinders.


He did not drive the car as advised and called dealer supplied the report and asked for a refund, the dealer said he would consider it, I helped him draft a letter Monday 17th saying under the consumer right act - right to return, he would like the car picked up, and a full refund based on the independent report and his right to return a faulty car.


I listed the main faults, I also noted the cost he had incurred in taking the car to garage getting home then having to pick it up again, he also had to pay for engine oil and other expenses.


I sent this to the finance company as well asking for acknowledgment, they haven't as of yet.


So far the dealer has refused a refund and said they won't accept responsibly until they have an independent report done, I pointed out that they have had that for 3 days.


it's nearly a week and they have the car, the report, his money and he doesn't have any transport.



Link to post
Share on other sites

chase the finance company and the dealer

theres no get out for either under FCA CRA.



and they should refund the report fee too!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx100uk,


Hope your well.


He has chased the finance company by phone and email, they have said they will get back to him.


I have made sure he copied the letters I wrote to close/complaints, close motor finance and the dealer.


The dealer has come back quickly but seems to be stalling, I have clearly set up that he wants to cancel the agreement and have the deposit returned under the consumer rights act - right to reject.


The dealer has said he wants an independent report before deciding what to do, again I said he has one.


Here is a section from my last letter:


- - - - -


However, I am not sure you're clear about my request. I have the right under ‘The Consumer Rights Act 2015’ to reject the car within the first 30 days, I have included a website link at the bottom of this page which will give you the facts, I also have them here for your reference:


Within 30 days - A short-term right to reject - The consumer has 30 days to reject a vehicle if it breaches the implied terms in any way. While the consumer can ask for the goods to be repaired or replaced the consumer is not obliged to give the retailer an opportunity to do so.


This means that for comparatively minor problems with a vehicle (for example a breach of the implied terms that goods are of satisfactory quality or free from minor defects) the consumer can reject without providing the seller an opportunity to repair.


The fact that I was asked not to drive the car by yourself on the first full day of ownership and have not driven it since.


I even took the car to an independent Mercedes garage as requested and at my own cost, which then produced a 9-page fault report goes far beyond anything I should have had to do.


You would have seen the car and the blue smoke from the exhaust when running, also the oil all over the rear bumper?


I don’t have to mention the headlights and other problems; I have a right by law to possibly reject the car on minor defects, I presented you with a damning independent Mercedes report four days ago.


- - - - -


He replied with:


- - - - -


In reference to your letter I am completely aware of the sales of good act,

The car has travel 320 + miles from when leaving the workshop for the MOT

and Service taking into account 70+ miles for delivery and movements that

leaves an approximate mileage of 250 miles travelled in the vehicle over the

space of your ownership. This means that they could be due to drivers

negligence that these issues have come up.


Being that the vehicle is a high performance vehicle with over 700BHP we are

not sure how the vehicle has been driven which is why I am waiting for a

full report.


- - - - -


I asked how much mileage he did do, he thought max 100 miles on the first day (showing every his new toy) then he was asked not to drive it which he didn't.


Looks like there is a problem with the engine, but also the electronics and lights...


He is worried about the cooling off period and not hearing back from the finance company as well as not having a car!




I mentioned the car collection costs as the dealer's previous email said this:


I have had the car collected at no cost to yourself (which is above and

beyond the call of duty)


As the garage I had the car delivered too is an independent and nothing to

do with Superbia they have vehicles booked in front of your car. The second

I get a report from the garage I will be happy to discuss this with Close

Brothers and yourself to come to some sort of closer.


Obviously, the dealer is 'completely aware of the sales of good (s) act'.


I thought it best not to upset the dealer by stating The Consumer Rights Act 2015 replaced the 'Sales of Goods Act 1979'.

Link to post
Share on other sites



Wondered if anyone has any ideas on what to do next?


Yesterday, he sent another letter to both the finance company and the dealer asking if they accepted to cancel the agreement under his consumer rights - short term reject, stating that they have the report and he is without a car or his money.


The finance company asked for the report even though the dealer has had it five days; he sent it.


The dealer responded mentioning the faults could be due to driver error and that the car had done nearly 200 miles, the dealer has said they will be in contact when they know more.


Today he had a letter by email from the finance company saying that it had been passed to their complaints department and will go through an investigation.


Should it not be complete within eight weeks from the date of his original complaint then they will write to give him an update.


He is without a car., without his £10,000 deposit, does he have to pay the finance until they decide what they are doing?


I'm shocked, to be honest.


I'm also thinking if it's not cancelled it will show on his credit report, therefore, hurting his chances of getting another car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no its cancelled no need to pay

as for the dodgy dealer claiming the 100mls he did has frucked the car

to me that sounds like he knew darn well is was a pup.



the 30 day clocksstop when you 1st notify the produce is being returned,



shame he paid cash, that's a very bad idea always leave you with no protection.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx100UK


He paid £9,500 cash, £500 card and the rest finance; I said it's better to the claim back or would you suggest he claims the £500 from the card and then just £9,500 from the dealer.


Saw him today, had to give him a lift somewhere!


He had mentioned having to buy oil for the car, turns out that the first thing the dealer told him to do was check the oil.


Apparently, it wasn't even registering on the dip rod thing; it does seem strange the dealer would say that when my friend had thought it was a gearbox/clutch problem.


Is he entitled to any costs while he is without a car and they dont tell him whats happening? will he have to wait 8 weeks?


Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

please tell me that was a credit card....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know, it was £500, and £9,500 was cash.


I can check,

but would you not link it all together?



I thought it creates more hassle for him,

I know he's getting quite stressed over everything which is why I'm helping,

he's got a young daughter and struggling to get her around,

and you can imagine his partner is not over the moon with the situation.


Does he just have to wait to hear if they will accept his request,

as I said Close have said it could be eight weeks +

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it was done by a credit card then the credit card company are responsible as well for THE WHOLE THING

under a section 75 claim.



it could be extremely good news if it was.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites



So there's nothing else that can be done now?


Just wait for up to 8 eights and beyond with no car or his money.


He's going to have a turn, if thats the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm dealing with a credit card company. I'm very surprised they don't know my rights and admitted they didn't know about the CRA references I quoted.

Sadly I don't expect - like the Martians - instant results.

The money people seem to hold all the fire irons and like to leave things in the in tray for some time.

Good luck and kind regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I meant 8 'weeks'.


The dealer offered yesterday to buy the car back for £1,500 less and settle the finance.


I have drafted an email for him to send saying that this is unacceptable and that he has already requested to reject the car under CRA.


Also drafted an email again to finance company asking them to help, they requested the list of faults last week, and they were sent immediately by email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The most unbelievable thing now!


The finance company is starting this investigation, the dealer is apparently waiting for the report on the car and will not offer a refund at this stage.


I thought I would have a dig around to see if there is any information about the company, he has done this before...


A few stories the same as my friends, but get this.


The dealer has put the car up for sale again, not only on his website but also on facebook, twitter, etc., I have taken a screen shot with the time and date, the car was advertised midday yesterday.


Surely this can't be allowed ??



Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...