Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi there. Unfortunately not. Apparently the incident was supposed to have happened on 4th Feb 2021 at 6 something in the morning. I was probably asleep at that time. Card transactions are on the statement on the 4th Feb but are from 3rd of Feb when the transactions took place. Nothing on the 4th of Feb. Although I had another car hire during that time so it would be absurd to even claim that anyone would rent multiple cars concurrently for months at a time. On top of that, whilst going through my statements, there was no payment to these guys so there is no way they'd rent a car to someone without paying a deposit or the rental fee. It's nonsense.       Hi there pal. Will check to see if they have a website now. Not sure but worried that if they'd go to the lengths of lying to the police they'd try to forge hire agreements with myself based on an old on. What they won't be able to do is provide any evidence that they took any deposit or payment from me for that vehicle or any vehicle for that matter in the time leading up to the incident. I will see about sending the SAR to them.   For the Claim form, I didn't know how to turn it into a pdf using my phone so I've taken photos of it and removed my identifying information.                 Total costs for the Claim are 10110 including 410 for Court Fees, so not sure if it's really considered as 10k or not With regards to time, I will start a list now on notes. Thanks.   I have attached the document they sent me regarding the other driver. I have removed some of his identifying info as well as he may be just another victim of these guys. The document isn't signed by anyone.   Basically when the police letter came I phone the son who's number I had multiple times and he told me it's ok, don't worry, he will sort it etc. Eventually he stopped answering my calls, so I sent him so many texts telling him to answer etc. Eventually he answered I yelled at him for using my details like that then told him I'd report him to the police if he didn't fix this. He said there must have been a mistake and that he knows someone else was hiring the vehicle. He then sent me a message on my phone with the details of the person who he claims was driving but does not put anything else in writing regarding this. I then use this to submit the information to the police regarding the incident.   I don't know what the police are doing about this. I attached the document they sent me regarding the driver (albeit it is something with no signiture that they could have put together themselves) as well as another attachment with a hand written letter explaining the fraud I believe they are committing on me as I did not rent that car from them. Might have to just go to a local police station and file an official report on these guys and their bogus response to the police fingering me out and using that to send me a Claim form. How can they do this if I did not go into their office since my last rental from the more than 6 months ago, I didn't sign any hire agreement (unless they forged one, which I wouldn't put past them), I didn't pay them a deposit or rental fee? There is no reasonable explanation how they can claim they gave a car to someone with none of the above. It's absurd.   thanks for the responses everyone.  
    • That's whet the yhellow card is for, they need anything that "Might" be linked to vaccine reporting in.
    • Many thanks @dx100uk I'll head over to the site and keep you posted. 
    • yes dx  the same one and 14 years on still paying    UB... thks have filled in online sar request to halifax  what happens if the halifax can not produce evidence of every payment made over the last 20 years off the original balance    i still have the original typed breakdown of the charges and amount house was sold for etc and the original balance  sent by the halifax 20 odd years ago
    • Yes send an SAR to Halifax.   If you have been making payments, Halifax should have full records available.   Halifax have been known to stop collection activity, if there is any doubt about the outstanding amount or if people stop paying after a number of years of making payments.  Payments made towards a shortfall debt are almost seen as a bonus, as they would not have expected payment to be received in many cases.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • Ebay Packlink and Hermes - destroyed item as it was "damaged". https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/430396-ebay-packlink-and-hermes-destroyed-item-as-it-was-damaged/&do=findComment&comment=5087347
      • 32 replies
    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
  • Recommended Topics

  • Recommended Topics

Asset Collection/TM Legal - old PDLs - already struck out once!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1351 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

 

will start this " high level" but appreciate we may need to delve into the lower level detail too..

 

In April 2017 a case I was a defendant for was "struck" as an order placed by the judge upon the defendant was not complied with.

Through the post last night I get a new county court for the same account, same claimant but different "solicitor" to send " payments/ documentation though to.

 

Is this REALLY allowed? and if so in what cases?

 

Just strikes me as odd

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop talking around corners

name names

you mean you PDL case?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry DX, I did say Id start "high level" :-)

 

In April 2017 Asset Collections took me to small claims for a PDL account.

NO reply to my CPR 31.14 request

no reply to the judges order to supply documentation in support of their claim ( CCAs, DNs etc)

No attendance in court.

During the hearing the judge gave both notice that she would allow the DCA an additional 2 weeks to supply paperwork

None received so case struck

yesterday I received court papers from TM Legal on behalf of Asset Collections after the same sum from the same PDL.

No material change in PoCs

Happy to supply any other information you may find relevant

Link to post
Share on other sites

get the usual links done please

the fact its already been struck out can be referred too later

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ?Asset Collections and Investigation

 

Date of issue – 07/07/2017

 

Date to acknowledge) = 25/07/2017

 

 

date to submit defence = 08th of August 2017

 

What is the claim for –

1.Asset Collections & investigation claim this amount in respect of an unpaid load funded by the lending Stream.

The defendant failed to abide by the terms of the contract.

Asset Collections & investigation purchased the debt from the Lending Stream and subsequently sent a notice of assignment to the defendant to advise.

 

2.The Defendant has failed to respond from the claimant thus denying the claimant any opportunity in assisting the Defendant in attempting to bring the matter to an amicable Conclusion.

 

3.The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year form 24/06/2016 to 06/07/2017 on £2,000.00 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.49.

 

What is the value of the claim? Approx £2000

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Payday loan(s)

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

Why did you cease payments? Unable to afford

 

What was the date of your last payment? April 2012

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you kept copies of the original claim ?

 

Are the particulars the same ?

 

Have you kept a copy of the General order striking the claim out ?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

Have you kept copies of the original claim ? I believe so, will check paperwork . I tend to keep everything

 

Are the particulars the same ? Will post them here when found

Have you kept a copy of the General order striking the claim out ? yes electronic and original papercopy

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi Andy

 

 

will confirm tonight / tomorrow am but

Have you kept copies of the original claim ? I believe so, will check paperwork . I tend to keep everything

 

Are the particulars the same ? Will post them here when found

Have you kept a copy of the General order striking the claim out ? yes electronic and original papercopy

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites
Have you kept copies of the original claim ?

 

Are the particulars the same ?

 

Have you kept a copy of the General order striking the claim out ?

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Only differences in their POCs in blue below

1.Asset Collections & investigation claim this amount in respect of an unpaid load funded by the lending Stream.

The defendant failed to abide by the terms of the contract.

Asset Collections & investigation purchased the debt from the Lending Stream and subsequently sent a notice of assignment to the defendant to advise.

 

2.The Defendant has failed to respond from the claimant thus denying the claimant any opportunity in assisting the Defendant in attempting to bring the matter to an amicable Conclusion.

 

3.The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xx/06/2016 to xx/11/2016 on £2,000.00 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.46.

 

what I will add is that the amount claimed is approx £400 more, presumably additional interest between the last case & this one

Link to post
Share on other sites

For reference to the original claim dated .2nd Nov 2015...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?455089-Uncle-Buck-amp-First-Stop-Recoveries-Ltd-CLAIM-FORM-***Claim-Struck-Out***/page3

 

I note that we do not have a copy of the previous defence.

 

The particulars in that thread read as follows....

 

1st stop recoveries claim this amount in respect of an unpaid load funded by Uncle Buck Ltd

The defendant failed to abide by the terms of the contract.

1st Stop recoveries purchased this debt from Uncle Buck and subsequently sent a notice of assignment to the defendant to advise the defendant

has failed to respond to any correspondence or communication from the claimant thus denying the claimant any opportunity in assisting the defendant in attempting to bring the matter to an amicable conclusion

 

No mention of section 69 interest above in the previous claim as per your previous thread.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So no thread for the previous claim ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
So no thread for the previous claim ?

 

 

 

none, my defence ( rightly or wrongly) was "prove it"

 

  • they didn't answer my CPR letter
  • Didn't supply judge the requested info before the first hearing
  • Didn't attend the first hearing
  • Didn't send to Judge after the 1st hearing so they struck it out

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay fine...thanks BF

 

So get the claim acknowledged and submit defend all.....I will need the dates you initially sent CCA/CPR request to the first claim and any responses.

 

Claim Number

Date of the first claim.

Date it was struck out ..which court and DJ name.(copy of the Order would be useful)

 

Once we have the above I will draft you a suitable response...this can be submitted more or less immediately ..no need to wait for the prescribed 33 days.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
Okay fine...thanks BF

 

So get the claim acknowledged and submit defend all.....I will need the dates you initially sent CCA/CPR request to the first claim and any responses.

 

Claim Number

Date of the first claim.

Date it was struck out ..which court and DJ name.(copy of the Order would be useful)

 

Once we have the above I will draft you a suitable response...this can be submitted more or less immediately ..no need to wait for the prescribed 33 days.

 

Andy

 

 

Do you want this via public forum or?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes except the name of the court and Judge claim number...you can insert that into the finished defence

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will need the dates you initially sent CCA/CPR request to the first claim and any responses. CCA & CPR letter received by claimant 28/11/2016 ( POD kept)

 

Claim Number - as you say we will add later

Date of the first claim. Nov 2016 ( exact date to be added)

Date it was struck out ..which court and DJ name.(copy of the Order would be useful) 10/04/2017 ( court and judge to be added later, I still have original )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks BF.

 

I will draft a suitable response over the weekend...we have plenty of time.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Not due until the 8th August BF..have you acknowledged service...must be done by tomorrow.Will draft you a response later this week.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
Not due until the 8th August BF..have you acknowledged service...must be done by tomorrow.Will draft you a response later this week.

 

Andy

 

 

Thanks Andy

 

 

yes AoS done

Link to post
Share on other sites

Draft you a response this evening.......promise:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of claim for reference only

 

1.Asset Collections & investigation claim this amount in respect of an unpaid load funded by the lending Stream.

The defendant failed to abide by the terms of the contract.

Asset Collections & investigation purchased the debt from the Lending Stream and subsequently sent a notice of assignment to the defendant to advise.

 

2.The Defendant has failed to respond from the claimant thus denying the claimant any opportunity in assisting the Defendant in attempting to bring the matter to an amicable Conclusion.

 

3.The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xx/06/2016 to xx/11/2016 on £2,000.00 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.46.

 

 

########Defence########

1. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. The claimants claim is denied having previously issued the same claim on Nov 2016 in the xxxxxxxxx County Court claim number xxxxxxxxx which was presided over by District Judge xxxxxxxx (See exhibit 1a)

 

3 . The claim was Struck Out on 10/04/2017 by the aforesaid District Judge.Therefore the claimant is precluded from reissuing the same claim pursuant to res judicata and therefore is barred from re-suing a winning defendant on the same cause of action. (see exhibit 1b)

 

4. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...