Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi   I assume this mattress was the Tenants own property?   So after moving out the Tenants provided an attachment showing a stained mattress and wanting full deposit back and threatening to claim against you for this.   1. Tenants failed to notify you of this stained mattress issue until the end of tenancy after they had vacated the property.   2. You have no evidence that this was the actual mattress used in that property nor evidence to back up there claim the staining caused this mattress damage.  (i.e. one of them could have had an accident and wet the bed or done this when they moved from the property).     3. Ask them that you wish the mattress independently inspected. (which you are fully entitled to do and if it proves this claim is false it will be added to the deposit claim by you the landlord for damages as well as the Garden if you need to get landscapers in to carry out the work that should have been carried out by Tenants as per Tenacy Agreement and raised  by yourself (Landlord) on a few occasions which Tenants failed to rectify even at end of tenancy.   4. Ask them to provide you with the contact details of there Contents Insurance Company (tenants whether Private or Social Housing should always take out and have Contents Insurance but is up to that tenant) bet they don't provide it Big question is the Deposit protected in a Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS) and those Tenants that have left were given a copy of the Prescribed Terms for that TDS? (Bear in mind you may need to tell TDS that you are in dispute with the Tenant about damages i.e. mattress and Garden)    
    • plenty of time to research and calm down. nothing much to do until the end of june.    
    • well ...... 1st you need to go back to post 1 and carefully read ALL this thread from the start again and pay attention to the advice and the undertones it explains about 'debt'.   2nd ...the truth is you owe no-one ANYTHING, the OC wrote off and sold the debt, and got most of it back against tax and business insurance schemes ...throw the morality card out the window...the OC did by selling the debt on for <10p=£1. and the DCa want the full balance ...id so many fools stopped paying powerless DCA's tomorrow, the whole industry would collapse overnight.   3rd the only reason this is still around your neck is because you failed to follow given advice...had you ..it would now be statute barred.      ^^^ very important research the M+S credit card debacle using our enhanced google searchbox on this page   as for the PAPLOC reply,   D.. desipte a previous CCA requests, the claimant has yet to supply any/all of the required paperwork.   i: delete [CC is attached to this reply form]"   
    • Hi again   Yes, it's been a lovely day weather wise.   Guess you've better things to do with weather like today than help with this problem, so thanks very much for your input, it's very much appreciated.   Late this afternoon I did receive a reply from the tenants, and they are asking me to go 50/50 with getting the garden sorted, not only that, as they have moved away they are expecting me to get the quotes.   Regarding you view on this issue, its so easy not to see the whole picture and my thoughts that the staining damp may be of their own doing didn't occur to me as I was so locked into the historical leak. Taking a closer look at the room in question today, I'm convinced that they are trying it on with the stained mattress- they did mail through a picture and then a receipt for supposedly the mattress. My wife and I then took both the pic and receipt to the bedding store where purchase was made to ask if the two married up, the picture does not show any emblems/manufactures logo or such to prove that this is the case, so we are none the wiser- our thoughts being that the stained mattress is from elsewhere.   A few days back I spoke to our letting agent regarding all of this, as was quite correctly mentioned there are two parts to this equation, namely the mattress and then the property.   Our agents mentioned to me that as an inventory was not carried out initially with the let, (hindsight) the pictures that were used to advertise the property could not be used as evidence to present to the TDS to be compared to the pictures now as there is no proof that the advertising pictures were in fact how the property was when the let started. I mentioned that all digital pictures have a means of finding when that pic was taken- Geo tag/Metadata- agent was quite surprised by this. The agents thoughts then went for a hide in a vacuum-   This is going off at a tangent here-many moons ago my wife studied computer science at a local University, one of her classmates who she is still in touch with is now a practising Solicitor. My wife suggested that maybe I give her a call, a bit rude I guess, but I did  phone and with the pleasantries out the way  I asked for her opinion of the best way to get this sorted. Her remit isn't landlord type stuff, however she will speak to a colleague on Monday and come back to me.   The property is due to be relet on the 21st, we will ensure that the new tenants move in to a home that is immaculate and welcoming, trouble is its getting a tadge close to get the garden issues sorted in time.   I know that all this will get closure in the end, but at the moment I've had more fun with a toothpick-   Again, many thanks.
    • The collection is currently stored at curator James Blower's home, but he has now found a space situated in an old bank premises where he hopes to exhibit them from this autumn or early next year. View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

Nolans/Cabot SPC Claim - old LLoyds Loan ***Claim Abandoned***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 667 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yeah and it is the date they confirmed on the phone but I know I had sent a token payment later that I can see from my rbs statements. It's the moorcraft payment in Feb 2014 that's the problem.

 

I'm sorry, I've just confused all of this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

So I've posted what needed posted.

 

 

It's just a waiting game now, apologies for the last few posts was just getting worried I had messed things up and confused myself but i think it's all in order now.

 

Thanks for the help so far, it's greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing for you to do.

signed for is never done by cabot.

stop sweating read other spc cases here so you know what to do/say.

 

if the claimant has not sent you ALL the required docs by the date the sheriff has ordered

get on the phone to the clerks office and tell them you want the claim dismissed and an absolvitor issued

read this too

 

https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:6449422593&ie=UTF-8&q=spc+decree+of+absolvitor+&sa=Search+CAG

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi!

 

I received the standard cabot CCA reply today, don't have info on file so will request info etc. update in 12 days.

 

Also received a letter for nolans saying they have asked the court for it to be paused. I have attached.

 

seems bad form considering they stated they had the credit agreement.

Pause.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd object

they've had this debt since july 2017 knowing then they had NO PAPERWORK.

they lied on the summons that they HAD the agreement.

 

 

and if it were not for the summons the debt would be statute barred winthin a few weeks

all they have done is issued a speculative claim to halt the statute barred clock.

very unfair and underhand

 

courts should not be used as a debt collection tool

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Received a letter from Cabot today titled an update on your request.

 

We're still processing your request, we have contacted the original lender for the relevant information.

As we haven't been able to provide you with the information you have requested, your credit agreement is unenforceable until we are able to reply to your request.

 

This means we are not permitted to obtain a judgement or decree against you in court.

 

Any use? Or are we hoping the judge rejects the pause application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

std letter they always sent to a CCA request

 

however i would send that along with post 54 and 56 points in an email to the SHERIFFS [NOT A JUDGE!!] clerk the day they fail the sheriffs orders. [which was what date?]

then after about 1hours

get on the phone to them and findout what they are doing about it.

 

seen 3 cabot/Nolan cases thrown out when the sheriff see that cabot letters now and fails his date for them to disclose what he ordered.

 

out rounding up sheep all day with someone and the new puppy. so only on a small screen.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The date is 30/01 so this Wednesday. I shall get the e-mail typed up ready to be sent Wednesday morning.

 

Thanks for all your help! I feel we might get a reply from the sheriff over the pause application before then but we shall see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry I couldn't see the date.

 

so send that reply form off with your objection to the pause wanting it dismissed as post 58 today by email to the clerks office then ring Monday and the cabot letter

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

which was?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 59 then

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the email away this morning, included those points and attached cabots reply. however i have been unable to call as the number isn't working.

 

on their page it says the phoneline is down.

 

https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/the-courts/court-locations/inverness-sheriff-court-and-justice-of-the-peace-court

 

I will keep an eye on it and try again later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

got through to the sheriff clerk today,

 

she said there was a note on the case stating that the case management discussion is going ahead and the application to pause and my objection to will be discussed there and that they received the email I sent when they failed the sheriffs order.

 

Just said I was to turn up. Guess its a waiting game now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the sheriff from your emails should be aware that the debt would now be statute barred if it were not for the speculative claim halting it, which yo aver was the reason it was raised.. and that, against what they stated the claimants did not and do not and cannot get a hold of the signed agreement that they averred they held in their original claim statement..liars!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just back from the case management.

 

Sheriff paused it for 6 months to give them a chance to get the paperwork.

 

 

I tried to put my points across, I guess not very well.

 

 

Ah we shall see what they can make up

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 5 months later...

so it's nearing time of the review and I haven't received anything.

 

"Orders the progress of this case to be paused to enable the Claimant's to locate the credit agreement; thereafter, Assigns xx August as review of the same"  

 

So it's just another case management discussion?

 

Sorry, I hadn't realised it was so soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wack in an incidental application.

read here

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Apologies, I never ended up sending the IA.  I had looked out the CCA replies they had sent, but couldn't find the last one and some other nonsense in life took over.

 

alas, I got to court today and their rep said they'd dismiss without expenses, sheriff asked if that was ok with me. 

 

I just said yes, I just wanted it all to end.

 

So thanks for all your help dx!  

 

i'll fire in a donation and hopefully this helps someone else down the line. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hehe always the way with nolans when you front them up.

 

good win regardless to the IA.

 

so was this actually simply dismissed or did the sheriff grant absolvitor and quash it for the future??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it was simply dismissed, thinking it over now I guess I should have mentioned and pushed for the absolvitor.

 

I assume if they tried to bring it back then it would count from now so it would be statute barred?

 

 

I assume I'll get something through the post if not I'll ring the court on Monday.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it to mean the same as an English Claimform case being 'won' and yes the SB thus never stopped.

had 3 like this

and one where they did try again, and folded when told it was now SB'd.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Andyorch changed the title to Nolans/Cabot SPC Claim - old LLoyds Loan ***Claim Abandoned***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...