Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • We hear from three people who have started their own companies during the downturn in aviation. View the full article
    • Covid-19 has created extra problems this Halloween, so how are firms fighting back? View the full article
    • its a 12mts contract else why would it say till 2021 and first month..   simply states they don't charge a joining fee clever marketing ploy as people don't read things. it IS a monthly payment, that runs for 12mts.   but anyway there is stuff and all anyone can do to you.   dx        
    • Hi Slick,   Amazingly fast reply, thank you!   According to the reference on the payment it says "ON 24 SEP BCC" and the payment cleared 25th September at 11:26   I was simply told to sign up on the website by a staff member in the gym, no further information was given to me by them. The website stated that it's a rolling monthly membership that could be cancelled at any time "No contract membership JUST £14.99 a month, until 2021*" As far as I am aware there was absolutely no minimum membership length, unless there's some small print I've missed somewhere. But Harlands haven't mentioned anything about me being obliged to pay for a certain length of time so... I've attached a picture to this post of what I signed up for.   Also, I'm not sure if this has any relevance at all but the building is plastered with £9.99/month signs EVERYWHERE yet it costs £14.99 when you go on the website. False advertising 🙄 Could perhaps use that as leverage in a letter if it comes to it, I dunno? 😂
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Lowell Claimform - Old Welcome Finance loan


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1148 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys & Gals,

 

Looking for a touch of help as this is, unfortunately, beyond my scope :-/

 

I'll be sending of the CCA Request & CPR 31.14 today.

 

Details below

-----------------

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Solicitors Limited

 

Date of issue – 19 Jun 2017

 

Date to acknowledge) = 07.07.17

 

 

date to submit defence = 21.07.17

 

What is the claim for –

1) The Defendant entered into a Consumer Credit Act 1974 regulated agreement with Welcome Finance under account reference ####### ('the Agreement').

2) The Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and a default notice was served and not complied with.

3) The Agreement was later assigned to the Claimant on 30/08/2012 and notice given to the Defendant.

4) Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £3,524.07 remains due and outstanding.

And the Claimant claims

a) The said sum of £3,524.07

b) Interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.772, but limited to one year, being £281.93

c) Costs

What is the value of the claim? £4,000

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim? Assigned & Debt Purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Honestly can't remember...

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Again, not sure - usually threw their letters in the waste.

 

Why did you cease payments? Financial difficulties & Moved properties (renting)

What was the date of your last payment? Dec 2016

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

 

 

-----

I did take the loan out with Welcome... must have been around 2009ish? But after checking some other links online I thought I might be able to combat it in regards to mis-sold PPI and other tidbits, but I'd rather get some better advice before I put anything stupid into my defence form T_T

 

Thanks in advance o/

Link to post
Share on other sites

was this the Only welcome loan you've had?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

don't sign anything

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx,

 

Gone through as advised and received the AoS - Confirmation page.

 

Will get the CCA and CPR requests sent off via recorded today.

 

 

You are a legend, Danke.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dramicus - They are a very good informative bunch on here...just keep posting updates and don't do anything without first taking advice off here... It is pretty much straight forwards with help. Start reading up on similar threads with regards to defending claims as well....

THE VIEWS POSTED BY MYSELF ARE STRICTLY MY OWN OPINION AND CANNOT BE RELIED ON FOR LEGAL PURPOSES.

IF IN DOUBT, CONTACT A QUALIFIED LEGAL EXPERT

SWISSTONI

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers swisstoni,

 

Well, both of the requests are sent off - obviously I've kept the receipt for the PO and tracking numbers for the recorded service.

 

Guessing it's just the waiting game now.

 

o7

Link to post
Share on other sites

now go read other like claim threads here and the successes forum off of this one

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX, reading through the forums as though they are a Tolkien novel!

 

Also, bit of an update, received a letter / Notice of Claim Issue from Lowell Solicitors today (Dated 26/06/16) which is a week after they appear to have lodged the claim against me.

 

Not received any of the requested paperwork back as of yet though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Upload link corrected

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
Lowells solictors PO Box Northampton what does it say smell a rat tells us nothing >??

 

It just seems somewhat odd that the Notice from Welcome doesn't even have their address on it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its in connection to first line of their letter being that the phone number has changed and have therefore blocked it out?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, getting closer to D-Day and still no further letters or correspondence from either the Solicitors or the Claimant - going to start penning up my defense submission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no paperwork/holding defence

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, this is where I'm sitting at the moment - would appreciate any feedback.

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

The defendant denies any & all claims of indebtedness as so alleged by the claimant to any & all sum(s) claimed and puts the claimant/claimants solicitor to strict proof of each and every fact pleaded in their particulars of claim.

 

 

Lowell Solicitors Ltd acting on behalf of the debt collection agency (Lowell Financial Ltd) have failed to produce the requested paperwork from the defendants CCA and CPR31.14 requests, this does not follow CPR rules.

 

 

a) The defendant made a written request to the claimant and Solicitors on 26th June 2017 (Recorded mail references & received by details) to be provided with documentary proof of the facts pleaded in their particulars of claim, all of these requests have been ignored.

 

b) The defendant requires by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, that the claimant/ claimants solicitor do provide a certified copy of the alleged written agreement referred to in the particulars of claim, as the defendant recalls signing no such document.

 

c) The defendant requires that in accordance with s.136 (1) of the law of property act 1925, that the claimants solicitor do provide proof of absolute assignment, by providing a certified copy of the deed of assignment between the assignor and Lowell Financial Limited to show proof that Lowell Financial Limited had complete transfer and ownership ( all rights, title, interest, benefits and liabilities) and that they have the power to give good discharge pursuant to s.136 (1) © of the law of property act. As referred to in the particulars of claim.

 

d) The defendant requires that in accordance with s.136 (1) of the law of property act 1925, that the claimants solicitor do provide a copy of the notice of assignment, by providing a certified copy of the notice of assignment between the assignor and Lowell Financial Limited to show proof that Lowell Financial Limited had complete transfer and ownership ( all rights, title, interest, benefits and liabilities) and that they have the power to give good discharge pursuant to s.136 (1) © of the law of property act. As referred to in the particulars of claim

 

e) The defendant requires that in accordance with s.136 (1) of the law of property act 1925, that the claimants solicitor do provide a copy of default letter, by providing a certified copy of default letter between the assignor and Lowell Financial Limited to show proof that Lowell Financial Limited had complete transfer and ownership ( all rights, title, interest, benefits and liabilities) and that they have the power to give good discharge pursuant to s.136 (1) © of the law of property act. As referred to in the particulars of claim.

 

f) Without these documents the defendant is unable to construct a proper defence and upon providing the above documentation the defendant be given the opportunity to submit an amended defence.

 

The defendant believes that the facts stated in this defence are true

 

 

Yes, this is a template that I sodomised for my use - I'm hoping it covers my bases, but as I said, any advice / criticism would be gladly taken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

urh..that's not our holding/n paperwork defence

not from here that's for sure

load of ole twaddle...

 

pst... As I said in post 8 ..you need to read a few thread here on cag.. :madgrin:

 

according to your profile

you've not read one other thread here at all.

searcg CAG box top read toolbar

 

Lowell claimform loan

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
urh..that's not our holding/n paperwork defence

not from here that's for sure

load of ole twaddle...

 

pst... As I said in post 8 ..you need to read a few thread here on cag.. :madgrin:

 

according to your profile

you've not read one other thread here at all.

searcg CAG box top read toolbar

 

Lowell claimform loan

 

 

Brutal, I love it.

 

I usually read through CAG while I'm at work, so not logged in - only log in to reply to this thread (at the mo).

 

The template I used was one a friend steered me towards so I figured I'd get some honest feedback (again, brutal 💕).

 

I'll have something with the right bite after I've eaten some dinner.

 

Cheers dx, love yah 😉

Link to post
Share on other sites
Brutal, I love it.

 

I usually read through CAG while I'm at work, so not logged in - only log in to reply to this thread (at the mo).

 

The template I used was one a friend steered me towards so I figured I'd get some honest feedback (again, brutal 💕).

 

I'll have something with the right bite after I've eaten some dinner.

 

Cheers dx, love yah 😉

 

Dont mince his words does he :lol:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
t112005.gif

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, after dx's poke, I re-visited my original defense and took some further pointers and took out the following...

 

The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are extremely vague. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

1. Paragraph 1 is accepted insofar as its admitted I have held in the past had a financial agreement with Welcome Finance. I do not recollect any outstanding debt and have therefore requested clarification by way of a CPR 31.14 and CCA Section 77 request.

 

2. Paragraph 2 of the claim is denied. I have not been served with a Default Notice pursuant to the consumer credit Act 1974.

 

3. Paragraph 3 is denied .I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1).

 

4. On receipt of the claim form, I the Defendant sent a request by way of a Section 77 request pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a copy of the agreement, by Royal Mail 1st Class Recorded Delivery, the Claimant has yet to comply and as such is in default of said request.

 

I have also requested by way of a CPR 31.14 request copies of the documents referred to in the particulars,the claimant's solicitor has failed to respond in context.

 

5.It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show and evidence any breach and service of a Default Notice; and

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

6. As per Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82 A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

 

8. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

Regards

 

Will drop it off onto MCOL shortly

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...