Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I received a Claim Form issued on 19 Jul 2021. The claimant is ParkingEye Limited.    The alleged offence took place on 22/10/2019. The particulars of claim read as follows:   "Claim for monies outstanding from the Defendant in relation to a Parking Charge (reference xxxxxx/xxxxxx) issued on 25/10/2019. The signage clearly displayed throughput University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff - Staff 4, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW states that this is private land, managed by ParkingEye Ltd, and that it is subject to terms and consitions, including auhotisation being required for parking, by which those who park agree to be bound (the contract). ParkingEye's ANPR system captured vehicle xxxxx entering and leaving the site on 22/10/2019, and parking without authorisation. Pursuant to Sch 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, notice has been given to the registered keeper, making them liable for the Parking Charge payable upon breach."   As they claim the PCN was issued in October 2019, I do not recall receiving anything in the post. I did receive a Final notice of Debt Recovery from dcbl, demanding £140. However, it had no reference on the letter so I just ignored it. I logged on to ParkingEye's portal to access photographic evidence and did not manage to find the complete PCN, however, there were just two pictures of the car with a time stamp (please see the attached files). I have copied the parking charge details from ParkingEye's website:   Parking charge details Parking Charge Reference: xxxxxx Vehicle Registration Number: xxxxxx Contravention date/time: 22/10/2019 19:41:52 Contravention location: University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff - Staff 4 Location address: Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XW Stay duration: 0 hours 30 minutes Allowed duration: 0 hours 10 minutes Status: Open Outstanding balance: £155.00 (Please allow 24 hours after payment for it to be reflected on the balance)   I do not recall parking there, however I may have entered the car on multiple occasions on the day to turn the car around.   I visited the car park yesterday to take some pictures (please see the second attached file)   I have completed the AOS on moneyclaim.gov.uk   I am looking to file my defence based on the following points: The photographic evidence supplied by the claimant does not prove the car parked in the above mentioned car park. It just shows the front and the back of the car with two different time stamps. The notice which states that it is a staff car park is located right at the end of the car park, which is not noticeable as you approach the car park and the board seems fairly new to me, the claimant has not provided any proof to suggest that it was there when the alleged alleged offence took place? As they have allowed a 10 minute grace period, a £70 charge for 20 minutes is unreasonable.   Any advice would be much appreciated!! Thanks a lot. Parking Eye 2-converted.pdf 20210725_232345-converted_compressed.pdf
    • Just need a bit of clarification on this. I run my own online business so I think I've got it right, but just good to have some clarification. I bought some items via ibidder auction site. Typically trade and liquidated items for sale there.  The items were men's fragrances and as I gather, auctioneers skip out of a load of the legal consumer right act jargon (from what I recall). Anyway. Several of these fragrances arrived smashed to bits. I logged it with the auction house with all photo's and evidence, and the staff responding even agreed with me that it was clearly damaged in transit.  Anyway, rather than refund me right away or ask me to return said damaged items to get a refund (as should happen right? After all, they pay insurance for their own benefit, to protect themselves as the sender), they put a claim in without refunding me. It's like they have been waiting for compensation to pay me, and if that didn't happen, it's no money for me.  To stop this getting long, the courier refused the claim because the items they sent were prohibited. Terms state anything made partly of wholly of glass won't be compensated and even so, fragrance rules is no more than 4 per parcel (they sent me around 10). Of course that's not my fault, they are responsible for shipment of goods and if they choose to cut corners, then regardless of it being trade lots, that's on them, not me. They've breached compensation terms of the courier and yet because of them not getting compensation, they wont give me my money back, even though they agreed from the evidence that items were clearly damaged in transit.  My thoughts on this (please tell me if I'm wrong): First port of call as they aren't forthcoming via emails is to put the pressure on them. Truthful bad reviews on sites like trustpilot will surely make them want to do the right thing? (That step is already done, by all means I'm happy to hear that I was wrong or it was stupid).   If that fails then it's down to an LBA, not just for the amount lost out on but also for loss of value of other items in the package (glass, liquid damage to those items reducing the value) and reasonable hours lost where instead of putting into my own business, I've been dealing with them.    The sum is low, some £50 or so. Yet it's the principal. I have to deal with customers day in, day out and if I cut corners by not fully insuring shipments, then it's me who takes the brunt and has to refund the customer anyway, so why should another businesses risk mean I've lost out? Thanks
    • both pages are in the earlier upload LFI   dx  
    • You have only shown part of the PCN. Could you please show the rest of it. Parking Eye are usually pretty good at complying with PoFA but not this time.
    • safe to ignore until/unless you get a letter of claim ive sorted both your posts with the unredacted PDF's now both unhidden    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard selling off old Egg Credit Card to Robinson Way


Sev
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1029 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

you should be on the roll

not being on voters is a stupid idea

only hurts your credit rating more..

 

it might be worthy to send the cca request yes.

 

not only for the fact of forcing the production of an enforceable CCA

but to legally inform a creditor you've moved.

 

its not a good idea to run away from debt and hide

you leave yourself and your mrs if this applies to her too [going by the no voters]

to backdoor CCJ's that you don't know about so cant defend against

 

the days of running and hiding are long gone, and to be honest

a very old wives tail that should never have been suggested by any forum .

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh I couldn't agree more.

It was actually Mrs S who opted out of the roll as she had issues a long time ago with a previous ex who was not the nicest of people.

- but that was a very long time ago.

 

Sorry, I should clarify, we're both on voters, but not on the public register.

 

And no, I don't do running and hiding.

 

The credit rating to be fair is the last of my troubles at the moment.

It's been shot for years, and will be until I clear all of my debts, which will not be for years!

Link to post
Share on other sites

defaulted dates are the clue.

sorry for the wrong idea on voters

no harm in not going public.

sorry

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem.

 

So date wise it goes like this;

 

Payment arrangement with egg which was maintained right through to barclaycard taking on all egg card business (2012?). Iirc I started the payment arrangement with them around end of 2005 into 2006.

 

At that point a new card number was assigned along with notification that barclaycard were now in charge.

 

I rang barclaycard to discuss arrangement and to see about getting payment details for such.

 

Barclaycard collections said that someone would be in touch in due course as they 'had nothing to do with this at the time'

 

I continued to make payments to the old egg banking details I had until I heard something back.

 

Since by 2014 I had heard nothing I stopped the payments.

 

The next contact was this one with barclaycard informing me that they have sold everything to hoist- ironically for probably a pittance of their worth.

 

So I've never really defaulted on a payment arrangement as far as I was concerned.

 

Would I be right in thinking that barclaycard have written off the debt and anything that hoist make over and above what they have paid is all profit for them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you CCA'd them?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

I hadn't realised how long it's been since this thread was updated!

It's been since the other side of last year that I've not heard anything after sending the CCA request.

 

Both Barclaycard and RW have remained silent.

Barclaycard however did comply with my SAR and sent me a massive file of nearly a ream of history with them.

 

If they (RW) have called and not left a message then they've probably been caught up in the auto ignore of all the telepest phone calls we all get on a daily basis.

 

So I suppose I'm asking where do I go from here?

I've not had any reply to the SAR or CCA from RW who wrote to say they had referred back to the original creditor (Barclayshark).

 

Were they to call / write etc do I entertain them?, and if so, how?

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

So after many months of no contact other than the usual pestering phone calls and automated calls ( of which I had asked them to stop and only communicate in writing- obviously ignored), I received a letter with a Notice of Assignement.

 

Hoist Portfolio Holding Ltd (HPH) has sold my account to Hoist Finance UK Holdings 1 Limited (HFUKH1L)

 

They've basically sold my alleged debt to themselves haven't they!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep means nothing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...