Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
    • At a key lecture in the City of London, the shadow chancellor will also vow to reform the Treasury.View the full article
    • Despite controversy China's Temu is becoming a global online shopping force.View the full article
    • The retailer has come under fire for an advert showing motorcyclists wearing trainers and doing wheelies.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

shoplifting at Tesco, Police called, no papers signed, banned from store


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2433 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

you don't manage DWF

you ignore them totally.

 

 

don't get me wrong

if you do get letters

they will appear mighty scary

 

 

but its all hot air to line their pockets

none of what RLP or DWF spoof out of people ever gets back to the store anyway!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no forget about it.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is nothing to pay.

 

 

its a voluntary gift a donation of goodwill

it carries no strings if you do or dont to anything.

 

 

as said earlier if you are really that worried about it

do it to a charity rather than tescos!

no-one will ever check you've done it or not

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much. I understand now, it was not like a condition.

However I will donateicon this money to a charity to make me feel better.

Will update if I hear from DWF.

Thank you once again for being so patient and addressing my concerns. I did not expect to get this level of support especially considering that what I have done is vile

Edited by Sidewinder
Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not expect to get this level of support especially considering that what I have done is vile

 

Please stop beating yourself up over this. Many many people find themselves in your situation and believe me a lot of them do not show anywhere near the level or remorse that you have. The important thing for everybody, not least yourself, is that lessons have been learned, appropriate help sought and that you move on with your life in a more straightforward manner. If being caught does this then justice has prevailed

 

My guess is that the police officer attending sensed the shame and worry that being caught has caused and suggested that a donation (which would be to Tesco's charity partner not to Tesco itself) might help to ease the burden and give you a feeling of making amends, but I cannot say for certain as I wasn't there. As DX says the police will have closed the incident as 'no further action' and Tesco in banning you will not be taking further action by trawling through CCTV for previous incidents - they couldn't act that far after the event as any chain of evidence would be broken.

 

As far as the Visa question goes - were you actually arrested and/or formally cautioned by the police officer? Providing that you can answer the ESTA questions truthfully online you shouldn't have a problem. US INS would not be consulting Tesco for information

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much Sidewinder. The responses I have got from everyone here give some me hope.

My worry about ESTA for US visa waiver emanates from the fact that I don't really know what happened that day, whether I was given a caution or community resolutio. I was definitely not arrested and I haven't signed any paper for Tesco or the police yet. Though the policeman had said there might be some paperwork. When I requested him not to come to my house, he took my mobile number and said he may contact me.

 

With the ESTA, unless I know what actually happened, whether It was a formal procedure or whether I have a criminal record, I won't know what to declare. If I declared I have no criminal record and I do, then that would not be true. Again if I don't have a criminal record and I declare, I will be declined the wish waiver and all in vain. The ambiguity is really worrying me though obviously I will be very grateful if what happened wasn't formal or ended in me having a criminal record.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about the visa. Nothing will be on any record that affects it.

 

Apply for your visa and state no convictions.

 

They're only Interested in major convictions. The type you go to court for. Not stuff like the police simply talked you you in a shop and let you go.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much renegadeimp. Feel better about the visa issue.

Now I hope I never get that dreaded call and the policeman and had he has mercifully washed his hands off me.

Don't suppose the DWF will show any mercy,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning,

To be honest, I'm not even sure DWF will write. Nothing said so far indicates they will get involved. I could be totally wrong of course. If they do contact you, we may be able to either bat them away or get them to write to a different address.

 

I have seen a couple of cases on CAG where visa issues were mentioned. At least one of these got a visa. The problem with shoplifting threads is that we rarely get a final update to let us know what happened over the long term.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about the visa. Nothing will be on any record that affects it.

 

Apply for your visa and state no convictions.

 

They're only Interested in major convictions. The type you go to court for. Not stuff like the police simply talked you you in a shop and let you go.

 

Are you suggesting the OP not use the visa-waiver programme (VWP), and instead apply for a visa?.

 

I think the OP should be able to apply for an ESTA and use the VWP if they weren't arrested by the police, and weren't given an FPN.

They haven't been given a formal caution (the type where they admit their guilt, signing a document stating this, at the police station).

They haven't received a FPN.

So, if the police officer didn't arrest them, the OP can apply for an ESTA, answering the questions truthfully.

 

https://uk.usembassy.gov/visas/visa-waiver-program/additional-requirements/

 

The VWP states clearly that in the event of an arrest or conviction, a visa must be applied for. I don't think this applies to the OP based on what they have stated in their posts, but for anyone who was applying for a visa, I'd declare in detail any event if at all unsure if it should be mentioned. They are likely to issue a visa with even a minor conviction, so even (for sake of discussion) if the OP had been arrested it wouldn't stop a visa being issued. Not declaring something minor that they later find out about would likely lead to refusal / revocation of the visa. (A minor issue becomes a major issue if they feel a false declaration has been made to secure a visa).

 

So, for the OP I'd suggest:

If you weren't given an FPN, didn't sign a formal caution at the police station, and the police didn't tell you you were under arrest (with the "You are not obliged to say anything but it may harm your defence ......" warning : Apply for an ESTA, and use the VWP

 

If any of the features above apply and you can't apply for an ESTA, apply for a visa. If applying for a visa mention anything you are at all unsure if you need to mention it : you can mention it and let them decide it doesn't matter & then it can't later 'come back to haunt you' on your application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really have no idea about police procedures.

 

 

However,

I was most definitely not arrested or taken to the Police station.

I have also not signed any paper so far.

 

 

The policeman said if you do this again, you'll will be a very serious trouble.

Then asked me to make the donation and I offered to get the money from the ATM but he said I need not do that especially for it but give it when I go to get fuel the next time.

He said he may call but hasn't so far.

So, I don't really know what happened.

 

The question about conviction and arrest asked on ESTA is fine but the more I get into details I am getting more and more confused.

 

 

Read something about 'moral turpitude'.

Don't understand if one declares only if arrested or convicted or also if one has committed such an act whether or not one has been arrested or convicted.

 

Do you suppose I will have a criminal record?

If I avoid ESTA and seek a visa, my husband is bound to ask why I was doing it.

What a mess have I got myself in.

 

I am feeling so scared and down that I might have ruined my life completely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

moral turpitude?

Are you a working prostitute or drugs dealer?

If not then nothing will pop out.

 

 

People arrested but released without charge for minor drugs offences get kicked out of the US.

 

 

Shoplifters dont have such problems

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you suggesting the OP not use the visa-waiver programme (VWP), and instead apply for a visa?.

 

I think the OP should be able to apply for an ESTA and use the VWP if they weren't arrested by the police, and weren't given an FPN.

They haven't been given a formal caution (the type where they admit their guilt, signing a document stating this, at the police station).

They haven't received a FPN.

So, if the police officer didn't arrest them, the OP can apply for an ESTA, answering the questions truthfully.

 

https://uk.usembassy.gov/visas/visa-waiver-program/additional-requirements/

 

The VWP states clearly that in the event of an arrest or conviction, a visa must be applied for. I don't think this applies to the OP based on what they have stated in their posts, but for anyone who was applying for a visa, I'd declare in detail any event if at all unsure if it should be mentioned. They are likely to issue a visa with even a minor conviction, so even (for sake of discussion) if the OP had been arrested it wouldn't stop a visa being issued. Not declaring something minor that they later find out about would likely lead to refusal / revocation of the visa. (A minor issue becomes a major issue if they feel a false declaration has been made to secure a visa).

 

So, for the OP I'd suggest:

If you weren't given an FPN, didn't sign a formal caution at the police station, and the police didn't tell you you were under arrest (with the "You are not obliged to say anything but it may harm your defence ......" warning : Apply for an ESTA, and use the VWP

 

If any of the features above apply and you can't apply for an ESTA, apply for a visa. If applying for a visa mention anything you are at all unsure if you need to mention it : you can mention it and let them decide it doesn't matter & then it can't later 'come back to haunt you' on your application.

 

Not suggesting anything. If he doesn't have a record then data is perfectly fine. Us authorities are only interested in large crimes. Not shoplifting.

 

I seriously wouldn't say anything about being arrested or being spoken to by the police on data form as it will then be guarantee refusal and you'll have to go to the US embassy and deal with them which can take up to 6 months.

 

Even if there's absolutely no trace of anything on your record, they will stick check it, charge you for it AND take their time doing it.

 

 

The op should be able to apply for an data without any issue whatsoever. In fact I'd apply for it now since it lasts 2 years.

 

As an example my neighbours ex boyfriend tried to break into her house in 2011 to attack her. She screamed, I went round and grabbed him. We started fighting, police were called. Both arrested. I was released without charge. 7 days later I applied for say a for 4 weeks in South Carolina. Didn't have a problem.with it.

 

 

The op hasn't even been arrested and it's a very minor crime which they've already dealt with. 99.99% sure they'll be perfectly fine.

 

 

If the op mentions it on data when there's absolutely no need then it's pretty much guarantees refusal and a trip to the embassy

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ericsbrother and renegadeimp, thank you very much for your advice. A guilty and scared mind is getting me in too many knots.

I will always be grateful for the support and advice I have got here.

If I do not get any call from the PolIceman in the next few days. I will try the Esta. Will update how it goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I do not get any call from the PolIceman in the next few days. I will try the Esta. Will update how it goes.

 

 

Before applying for your Esta, it might be best to make a subject access request to see your criminal record, if they have anything on you; so if they have nothing on you, you should be ok to apply for your Esta, and it says all the hassle of being refused entry into the USA, all because of a criminal record

 

 

Details here https://www.gov.uk/copy-of-police-records

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not criminal to be on DWP/RLP fake databases

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I have received a letter from DWFasking me to Pay £125 as Security costs within 7 days. The break up given is:

Value of goods stolen £0.00

Value of good damaged £0.00

Value of cash stolen £0.00

Security costs £125.00

Amount due now £125.00

There is also a sheet with frequently asked questions attached.

The DWF are solicitors. Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure how many times various people has told you to totally ignore them already..

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes dx I know that I should ignore since the £125 security cost is just preposterous. Still got rattled as they say' we require payment of the outstanding balance during the next 7 days to avoid further action'. Surely it wouldn't have cost them all that much

Link to post
Share on other sites

. Still got rattled as they say' we require payment of the outstanding balance during the next 7 days to avoid further action'. Surely it wouldn't have cost them all that much

 

What further action? More letters of course. That is all they can do. they cannot take court action. Only Tesco can do that except they won't.

 

If Tesco did sue for £125 they would have to justify the costs and they can't

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree. I am just going to ignore the letter. Also read on some threads that they call people at their homes. I didn't give my land line number to the Tesco guys (they didn't ask). It will be quite stressful if they call. But after taking advice from here and reading on this issue I am just going to ignore them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...