Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. And, I also continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim for personal injury to eyes


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2501 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In May 2015 my friend's neighbour fitted a new steel railings at the front of her house. The railings were welded up by her father, so owner of property has vicarious liability.

 

 

The railings form the boundary between her property and the pavement and there was no barrier sheilding the public from the flash of the welding arc or the metal fragments from the grinder used to tidy up the welds.

 

 

well, you guessed it, my eyes were caught by the welding flash and suffered retinal burns in both eyes and pitting to both eyes from the metal fragments .Very painful. Attended A&E, got treatment and antibiotic for the infection from the metal fragments.

 

 

Cleared up within a week.

 

 

The paintwork and windsreen of my car was also showered with hot metal fragments. Sorted out the paintwork myself, but the windscreen is covered in tiny pits. Noticable and distracting when driving into the sun.

 

 

Written LBA to owner of property but no response. Told owner at the time, response was to go forth and multiply.

 

 

Time to sort this out before three years is up. Medical report of examination obtained from A&E visit in 2015.

 

 

Prob is, I'm in N.Ireland and defendent is in England. Need a little advice on N1 claim form.

 

 

Do you need to include full POC with N1 or a brief outline with full details and evidence included at Allocation stage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing to ask is what exactly are you claiming for?

Property damage/Personal Injury or both

The property damage will be a straight forward Money claim online but the personal injury might be difficult and if it was me instruct a solicitor over the water

 

Just my opinion though

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both, but primarily damages for personal injury.

 

 

I contacted a no win no fee company, but was told award would be less than £1k so they werent interested. Suggested N1 and small claim.

 

 

Just a bit awkward doing a claim in England through English system whilst in another UK jurisdiction. I sure it can be done. Just wont be able to attend the court myself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In May 2015 my friend's neighbour fitted a new steel railings at the front of her house. The railings were welded up by her father, so owner of property has vicarious liability.

 

 

The railings form the boundary between her property and the pavement and there was no barrier sheilding the public from the flash of the welding arc or the metal fragments from the grinder used to tidy up the welds.

 

 

well, you guessed it, my eyes were caught by the welding flash and suffered retinal burns in both eyes and pitting to both eyes from the metal fragments .Very painful. Attended A&E, got treatment and antibiotic for the infection from the metal fragments.

 

 

Cleared up within a week.

 

 

The paintwork and windsreen of my car was also showered with hot metal fragments. Sorted out the paintwork myself, but the windscreen is covered in tiny pits. Noticable and distracting when driving into the sun.

 

 

Written LBA to owner of property but no response. Told owner at the time, response was to go forth and multiply.

 

 

Time to sort this out before three years is up. Medical report of examination obtained from A&E visit in 2015.

 

 

Prob is, I'm in N.Ireland and defendent is in England. Need a little advice on N1 claim form.

 

 

Do you need to include full POC with N1 or a brief outline with full details and evidence included at Allocation stage?

 

 

Hi, a couple of questions if you don't mind.

 

Who do you intend to sue?

 

Why do you think the homeowner is vicariously liable for her father's actions?

 

How is the Defendant in England if you live in NI?

 

Where were you and what were you doing when the injury occurred?

 

Why were you looking directly at the flash?

 

Does the Defendant have insurance or the means to pay you even if you win?

 

Have you got an independent medical report from an appropriate medico-legal expert?

 

If you can't attend Court yourself then you are not going to win your case as not turning up at the trial is likely to result in your case being struck out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I intend to sue the householder. They have VL due to the father acting as their agent or servant, not as as an independant contractor.

 

 

The negligent act occured in England.

 

 

I was walking on the public pavement, the welder struck the arc without warning or consideration.

 

 

No idea if householder has means to pay, happy with whatever judgement I get, if any. Need justice, cannot let this go unchallenged.

 

 

Have doctors report from a&e with diagnosis and diagram of injuries to eyes.

 

 

Understand that court will hear case in absence due to expense of attendeding. If I attended it would add several hundred pounds due to travel- ferry/ fuel or flights, accomodation/ meals etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea if householder has means to pay, happy with whatever judgement I get, if any. Need justice, cannot let this go unchallenged.

 

What benefit do you get if you get a judgment in your favour but can't enforce it?

Is that "justice"??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I intend to sue the householder. They have VL due to the father acting as their agent or servant, not as as an independant contractor.

 

 

The negligent act occured in England.

 

 

I was walking on the public pavement, the welder struck the arc without warning or consideration.

 

 

No idea if householder has means to pay, happy with whatever judgement I get, if any. Need justice, cannot let this go unchallenged.

 

 

Have doctors report from a&e with diagnosis and diagram of injuries to eyes.

 

 

Understand that court will hear case in absence due to expense of attendeding. If I attended it would add several hundred pounds due to travel- ferry/ fuel or flights, accomodation/ meals etc

 

 

Not sure that the householder is vicariously liable for her dad helping out.

 

You need a proper medico-legal report. Your hospital records are not going to be sufficient.

 

You also can't just not turn up to the trial. It's your claim and you are the Claimant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also took photos at the time, father grinding away on welds. i'll put it up here when I remember how!

 

Did you take the photos ?

 

The Judge and anyone defending will ask the question about how you managed to operate a camera device, if your eyes were so badly affected.

 

If you suffered any injury due to lack of duty of care, you would have to sue the Father, not the householder. It will be an issue of personal liability.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have seen a solicitor for advice about vicarious liabillity, I do know what I'm on about.

 

 

He said ask for £5000 and leave the amount awarded to the judge.

 

 

Just asking about N1 forms and protocol- no experience of E/W claims. Thats all.

 

 

N.Ireland has a much easier to use small claim system, but as its an individual in England I'm chasing, I cant do it through the N.Ireland court system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have seen a solicitor for advice about vicarious liabillity, I do know what I'm on about.

 

 

He said ask for £5000 and leave the amount awarded to the judge.

 

 

Just asking about N1 forms and protocol- no experience of E/W claims. Thats all.

 

 

N.Ireland has a much easier to use small claim system, but as its an individual in England I'm chasing, I cant do it through the N.Ireland court system.

 

 

You should read up and check the advice on vicarious liability before starting your claim.

 

You should also look up if you need an English/Welsh service address if you are making the claim from NI.

 

If you intend to issue one anyway, you need to complete the N1 and enclosed a full particulars of claim with all the details of the accident and allegations of negligence. You also need to include a medical report, not just your medical notes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ganymede, thats all I wanted to know.

 

 

My N.Ireland solicitor knows all about vicarious liability, but cant do anything for me in the English courts as its a different juridiction.

 

Please also read up on it yourself beforehand though, along with my other suggestions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...