Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Engage Credit - Being threatened with possession within 7 days


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2516 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I currently am in breach of a suspended possession order dating back to the 4th of september 2015.

 

 

An order was made that i had to pay an extra £1000 on top of my normal payment of £650 per month in order to pay off the arrears of £6000...

 

 

at the time i was lead to believe that i had to accept this or the judge would def evict us

in desperation agreed...i know now that was a mistake.

 

 

I actually did manage to just about get the arrears under control by selling most of the contents of my house and stopped all building works.

..which was what put me in arrears in the first place

(old house with loads more problems than originally quoted for).

 

 

I have approx £175,000 equity in the property and the mortgage was for 50% of the purchase price.

 

 

I currently have arrears of £5208 and my monthly payment is £670...

i have offered to pay £250 a month which they have refused to accept though i have been doing this each week.

 

 

I have 254 months left to pay on the mortgage which if im right would equate on the norgan rule?

to be £20 extra per month?

 

 

Today i have received a letter stating if i dont pay the arrears in full within 7 days they will be applying for a warrant of possession.

 

 

..please someone give me some advice..

, would the judge take into account the 1000's and 1000's i have spent renovating this house and give me abit of slack.

 

 

..feel desperate and like ive let my family down just as things should be getting better!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you put your offer of £250 per month in writing?

Who is the lender ?

Did you attend the possession hearing when the suspended order was given ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes i put it in writing and though they said they would continue accepting payments they would not agree to it as a formal arrangement

 

 

fees etc were still being added..

.mortgage is with engage Credit.

 

 

I wasnt able to attend the court hearing as i am self employed and had a long standing booking at a trade show 300 miles away.

..it would have been financially disastorous for me to cancel this.

 

 

..i explained in advance and because they 'persuaded' me to offer such a large amount they had alreday agreed before it went before the judge they wouldnt seek full possession.

..hence why i know feel like i have a death sentence hanging over me.

 

 

Being self employed my income can be sporadic but the main reason im in arrears is down to the massive building project we took on with this house in the first place..

.we are so close to being finished and we are at the decorating stage.

 

 

..this will obviously be on hold to the mortgage is sorted but we have had a new roof, new electrics, new windows, insulation, granny annexe...spent 5 years busting our guts..

Edited by honeybee13
Last sentence removed - inappropriate
Link to post
Share on other sites

engage huh

who was the original mortgage with

they are buyers of defunked or bad ones.

 

 

little tip

get an sar runningto them tomorrow

you know all those fess they've been charging

late

letter

arrears

debt management

they can ALL be reclaimed back!!

 

 

get this episode sorted and we'll hit them with it.

 

 

hope they didn't make you take out any stupid insurances too?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No havent got any insurances with it...currently on my account statement it says account arrears is £5034 and the fees balance is £5179..ie more than the arrears...originally mortgage was a self cert with another mortgage lender...the name of which atm i cant recall...it was sold very early on as were the majority. What is a sar?

Link to post
Share on other sites

click sar

 

but if you've the statement you don't need an sar then

 

this could be fun!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what my latest account statement says, dated 11th of May

Original amount borrowed £143, 520.00

Original term 360 months

Loan start date 23 July 2008

Current monthly instalement £655.50

Arrears balance £5,034.25

Fees balance £5,179.73

Account balance £128, 895.29

remaining original term 254 months

 

It is also worth pointing out the equity in the property is currently around £175, 000.

Im not shirking my obligations but the fees are just crippling me...and i just never seem to beable to dig into the arrears because of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, the problem arose as you were unable to attend the hearing and were bullied into offering an enormous amount each month towards the arrears. Had you been able to go before the judge at the hearing with a good defence and financial statement you would have been able to get an order for arrears payments much much lower as the arrears were only £6k.

 

You could apply for a hearing in front of a judge (which you would definately need to attend), and in your statement for court explain that you were bullied into agreeing to an amount which was not affordable and told you didn't need to attend as agreement had been reached beforehand. You could make the offer of £250 per month which is a perfectly acceptable amount to pay towards the arrears.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it worth writing another letter reaffirming the offer and including a income and expenditure so they can see its affordable or should i push for spreading the arrears over the term of the mortgage...is this reasonable request if it did go back to court do you think?

 

the enormous amount was because they told me on the phone i would have to pay it off within 2 months but as a goodwill gesture they would give me 6 months as this was legally what they were allowed to demand...this is why i refuse to speak to them on the phone know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They were misleading you !! and it's a shame you didn't get the chance to say so in the hearing, you would have got a very different repayment order I'm sure. You could certainly write to them with a budget sheet - I have affixed the one we normally use in these cases. You just need to make sure there isn't a lot left over after everything has been accounted for or they will expect you to pay that towards the arrears too. I can help you word the letter if you like ?

Budget Sheet.xls

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah i totally agree

but tbh if i had attending the court date i wouldnt have been able to even meet my normal payments.

..it was a trade show that we had been working towards for months.

 

Whenever ive spoken to them on the phone they've always said i must pay the arrears back very quickly and a court would def approve re possession if i didnt do this so i in fear went along with it.

 

..i did know i wouldnt be able to afford it without selling my possessions but they pushed me into filling in an income and expenditure form...over the phone without any prior notice

 

i exagerated my earnings to show i could pay it, hope that makes sense, they made it sound like if i couldnt do that i was gonna be evicted.

 

If i fill in another income and expenditure form it will show i can pay the normal mortgage and some towards the mortgage but not what the court order states.

 

..will that mean the judge if it goes back to court will take our home

, i dont have any written evidence they pushed me into it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need any written evidence to show they pushed you into it - if you had to go back to court it would be evident to the judge that given the amount you offered to pay and the fact that you weren't there would indicate that you had been forced into that situation. Judges are well aware of these lenders practices.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, ty for that...

can i just clarify as ive had years being told different if i am able to show i can meet my normal payment and something...though not alot towards the arrears each month will a judge be happy for us to stay in our home,

 

 

could i use the Norgan ruling..

.and would the fact there is alot of equity in the property and that the mortgage was only for 50% have any bearing,

 

 

also would they take into account the reason im in arrears is due to all the building works we have carried out?

 

 

So grateful for your replies by the way..feel like im slowly starting to take control of the situation!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you are correct in that a judge would take into considertion the Norgan case, but your offer would still have to be realistic in line with your income, i.e. if you are able to pay £200 per month towards the arrears then you wouldn't get away with offering £20.

 

Was the building work necessary or because you wanted to improve the property ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, that makes sense.

Yes the building work was totally necessary,

the windows all leaked and were drafty,

the complete electrics were condemmed by my electrican and the fuse box was ancient,

the plumbing all leaked,

no insulation so very cold,

central heating didnt work...boiler and pumps all ancient and beyond repair,

double chimney stack with no support and about to collapse needed taking down as an emergency before it fell down,

roof all needed redoing and retiling as the tiles were to heavy for the structure and the timbers had woodworm..

.i could go on but i think you get the picture..

 

 

.annoying really as though we were aware of some of the problems alot of the hidden problems really should have been pointed out by the surveyor,

we had a full report done but found out after from the sellers the surveyor was in and out in 15 mins and refused to go in the attic as he didnt have a torch!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...