Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

arrow/restons claimform - Old LLoyds Loan - Prob SB d


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2480 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Synopsis

Public Sector temporary employee suffered loss of income due to Sector restructure.

 

Background

Lloyds loan taken out November 2008 for £7.5k for 7 years. Failed to make repayments from January 2011. Default August 2011. The debt has been round the usual houses: SCM -> MHA -> Moorcroft-> Iqor-> Robinson Way->Horwich Farrelly->MacKenzie Hall->Arrow Global Ltd->Debt Managers-> Rockwell-> Moorcroft-> Westcot->Arrow Global Ltd/Restons. No communication entered into with any.

 

Claim

On 8th May 2017 Arrow Global Ltd issued N1 against me through Northampton.

 

Particulars

The Claimant claims payment of the ovedue balance due from the Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendant(s) and Lloyds TSB dated on or about Nov xx 2008 and assigned to the Claimant on Nov xx 2013

Particulars a/c no – xxxxxxxxxxxx

Date Item Value

xx/03/2017 Default Balance xxxx.xx

Post Refrl Cr NIL

TOTAL xxxx.xx

 

• 10th May 2017 AOS submitted

• 12th May 2017 unsigned request pursuant to s.77 of CCA 1974 sent by recorded delivery including £1.00 postal order sent to Arrow Global Limited.

• 24th May 2017 reply received (letter dated 22nd May 2017)…acknowledged request for documentation “We do not accept we are the creditor as envisaged by the above statute” (CCA1974). “However, we are willing to assist in obtaining that which has been requested. We will now process your request for documentation from the creditor and will revert in due course. We confirm that all collection activity will be suspended pending provision of the documents. Please find enclosed your £1.00 fee. Yours sincerely Arrow Global.”

 

Am seeking most pertinent verbiage to defend above.

 

Many thanks for all of your help

 

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically its a lemon debt, which is prob why its been passed around. If you do not recieve a complaint response for the CCA request ( ignore arrows silly reply about creditors), then wait until the last day to file the defence and file the no paperwork holding defence.

 

Arrow are doing what they always do. Grab a junk debt, and file a claim regardless.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you haven't received any CCA?

 

Also, do I understand that you were in breach of the agreement from January 2011 – meaning six years and four months ago?

 

In that case, defence might be

 

The debt is denied. In any event, the claimant has failed to provide a CCA pursuant to statutory request. Also, any alleged debt would be barred under the Limitation Act 1980

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rsc and Welcome to CAG

 

If you could read the following link explaining the process of defending a court claim and then copy and paste the Q,s and your responses back here for further advice on how to proceed.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for your prompt response

 

Do you have a link i can use for the "no paperwork holding" defence please?

 

I just typed that into the search on CAG and it gave me so many options, but not entirely certain which one to use.

 

Your help is very much appreciated.

 

Cheers

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please complete the link in post #4 above then we have the history of the agreement and dispute...then we can advise on defending the claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

Many thanks for your help.

 

Please see below the questions duly answered:

 

Name of the Claimant? • Arrow Global Limited

 

Date of issue? 08.05.2017

 

 

DAte to acknowledge) = 26.05.2017

 

 

date to submit defence = 9.06.2017

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

• The Claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the Defendant(s) under a contract between the Defendant(s) and Lloyds TSB dated on or about Nov xx 2008 and assigned to the Claimant on Nov xx 2013

What is the value of the claim?

• £5000.00 (rounded up to nearest two significant)

 

Is the claim for a current (Overdraft) or credit card /loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? • Bank loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? • After 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.

• Issued by Debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? yes • In December 2013 Lloyds Bank wrote to me “has assigned all its respective rights, title and interest in respect of the above referenced account (including the outstanding balance) to Arrow Global Limited.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? • Yes, April 2011

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year?

• 2012 headed “notice regarding your personal loan” with a paragraph headed “Default sums and Interest”; same in 2013; in 2014 Arrow Global wrote under the heading “Notice of Sums in Arrears”; same in 2015 in June and December.

• There was nothing in 2016 or 2017 and none of the letters were headed “Notice of Default sums.”

 

Why did you cease payments?

• Last payment xx November 2010 (I then took a loan holiday and the next payment was due in February 2011 – I believed it was January; however I have subsequently found correspondence from Lloyds Bank.

What was the date of your last payment? • Last payment xx November 2010

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?

No: last communication made by me in relation to this debt was a request for a loan holiday made in December 2010 and granted.

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan ? • No

 

If you have not already done so – send a CCA Request to the claimant for a copy of your agreement (except for Overdraft/ Mobile/Telephone accounts)

• Already submitted CCA Request. Response received:

• “We do not accept we are the creditor as envisaged by the above statute” (CCA1974). “However, we are willing to assist in obtaining that which has been requested. We will now process your request for documentation from the creditor and will revert in due course. We confirm that all collection activity will be suspended pending provision of the documents. Please find enclosed your £1.00 fee. Yours sincerely Arrow Global.”

 

Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts

• Have not done so, but will be expedited by recorded delivery on 30th May 2017

Cheers

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like its SB as Bankfodder pointed out. Easy win for you. Better luck next time arrow.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

go file this on mcol now

 

 

you should of done this the day after getting the claimform

rather than wasting time and money on a CCA/CPR

 

 

The following defence is all you need if it is SB

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).

2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.

.

If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

.

3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC] or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

..

..ends..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

Thanks for your responses and believe me it is helping no end.

 

• I last paid money to Lloyds TSB per this debt on xx December 2010

• Granted payment holiday January 2011 per my request for this

 

So, is SB date xx+1 December 2016? If not, then when?

 

Cheers

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 years from last payment or written admission the debt was yours. Whichever was the latest.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

could be deemed that a payment holiday was ack'in the debt.

but they'd have to get all the letters

and I've never seen them do that.

 

 

IMHO go with the SB

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

Thank you very much for all of your help with this today.

 

I have gone to MCOL and filed my defence as SB exactly the way you have suggested.

 

Will report back the outcome to you.

 

Cheers

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they say it isnt SB, then its on THEM to prove it isnt. Normally theyll just try and blff it. But when you call them out on it, theyll run off as its a waste of their time unless the money is a very large amount. But even then, SB sinks the claim

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Guys

 

Well you are not going to believe what has happened.:wink:

 

Just received the following letter from my “favourite” solicitors.

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Dear Sir

 

Re: Arrow Global Limited v Yourself

Claim Number: xxxxxxxx

Original Creditor and Product Type: Lloyds TSB – Loan

 

We note you have recently filed a Defence to the court proceedings issued against you.

 

Although you allege that the Claim is statute barred, we note that you have provided no information / evidence of when you believe the limitation period commenced, nor have you provided any details of when you believe you last made a payment towards the debt or when you last acknowledged your liability for the debt.

 

In any event, the information we have received from our Client is that a default notice was issued to you in April 2011 which is within 6 years of these proceedings having been issued. In the circumstances, we entirely disagree with your assertion that Claim is statue barred.

 

In view of the information set out in this letter, we do not believe your Defence has any real prospect of success and we will therefore recommend to our Client that an application be made to strike out the Defence and to enter a Judgment against you for the full amount claimed, together with the legal fees and costs. Should you wish to avoid these further costs being incurred then we invite you to withdraw your Defence by completing the enclosed Form N9A and returning to this office within 14 days.

 

We await your response.

 

Yours faithfully

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

 

Again is this simply best ignored or is there a best way to reply/or links that show this?

 

As always, many thanks for all of your help with this.

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore willy waving

 

 

sb runs from last payment DATE

NOTHING TO DO WITH dn DATE

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you again for confirming right approach.

 

Guessed as much and was not going to react to them.

 

Will keep you informed in case I hear anything else.

 

Much appreciated

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Update

 

last communication 29/06/17 from Arrow Global (not Restons) assuring me: that they are still looking for the credit agreement as requested by myself on 12th May is still being searched for.

 

Needless to say the 28 days since defence filed has come and gone...oh dear:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't matter a monkey's if they do find it.

the debt is statute barred

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...