Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrows/Reston claimform - old Sainsbury Credit Card - SB d?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2320 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

As the title says I am defending a debt as Statute Barred.

 

However have the following predicament.

 

The last payment I made was through CCCS/Stepchange in 2009 for which I have a statement that confirms this from them.

 

However on my old credit report date 2012 the payments show up in the 13/24 months bracket so the last payment I made on the 9th Oct 2009 is showing as paid In June 2011.

 

There are also payments in the 1/12 month brackets for random amounts that were not part of the original payment plan and the date of last payment according to the Claimant is April 2012.

 

I have no record of these payments on my bank statements so has anyone any idea where they could have come from.

 

 

I certainly wouldn't have paid by cash so am wracking my brains to think what these payments could be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can we have the full story please

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**(4-Viewing)-nbsp

 

 

i'd be letting them work that out as well [the payment]

 

 

so phantom payment syndrome?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi feebee23

 

If you would please read and complete the link posted in #2 (copy and paste the Qs and your responses back here) so we have all the history and details of the claim so we can advise the best course of action on how to proceed.

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

you indicate these statements have come from the claimant?

did you CCA/CPR or they've simply sent them?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Arrow/Restons

 

Date of issue – 15 May 2017

 

Date to submit defence = 16/06/2017

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.The claimant claims payment of the overdue balance due from the defendants under a contract between the defendant and Sainsbury's Bank. dated on or about Aug 04 2006 and assigned to the claimant on April 23 2013.

 

Particulars a/c no xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

Default balance £5432.11

Post Refrl credit Nil

 

Total £5432.11

 

What is the value of the claim? Around £6k

 

Is the claim for a current (Overdraft) or credit card /loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? 2006

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.Assigned a few times over I think

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? To that I know of.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Im not sure

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Again not sure.

 

Why did you cease payments?Financial crisis

 

What was the date of your last payment?01/11/2009 – They state that it was March 2012

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan ? Yes

Edited by feebee23
Link to post
Share on other sites

you indicate these statement shave come from the claimant?

did you CCA/CPR or they've simply sent them?

 

Sorry the payment statement was from the Consumer Credit Councilling Sevices not the DCA.

It just listed my payments and date taken.

 

I have sent out Cca,SAR and tCPR

Edited by feebee23
Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thank you

so what have you done so far?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bit silly really to send CCA/CPR if you file the SB defence..

SB is absolute it doesn't matter what paperwork they hold or don't

IMHO weakens your SB claim...

 

now so where has this info come from that its not SB'd, they replied to the CCA/CPR? from CCCS

edit...ah several posts ... then you keep that to yourself!!

 

and was it our SB defence you filed?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crikey,does it!

 

I took this action on the advice of a Debt Charity.

 

The claimant has not responded yet to the Statute Barred defence.

I suppose my main concern is that my credit file from 2012 shows payments made in the previous two years when the actual payments were made in 2009.

 

That is the only thing that I can't explain or reconcile with my own bank statements.

 

Do you think I am done for now then and if so should I be looking to negotiate with Restons/Arrow.

 

And yes I used the defence from here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not you wait

 

if they don't produce proof of its not SB'd

its their job to prove its not

not yours to prove it is!!.

 

what does your credit fil show today?

 

you can keep to yourself the info you have

don't tell the DCA for sure...:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good lets see them get that info then.:lol:

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have had a letter back from Restons.

 

To summarise it says

that as I am defending as Statute Barred that they do not have to adhere to the request for CPR.

 

that if I send in templates letters garnered from websites that encourage people not to pay their debts then I am wasting their time.

 

stated since the last payment date was the 06/04/2012 then my defence will be struck off and judgement made if I don't send of the N9 form within fourteen days.

 

that I should have sent proof if I disputed making the payments such as six months of bank statements from the date of payment.

 

Any ideas what my next step should be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Completely ignore it......utter nonsense...disclosure comes after defence and allocation.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's rectums for you .....:wave::wave::wave:

 

they've been losing far too many battles to CAG

and they don't like it up 'em Mr Mannering...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for taking the time to respond, especially on a Bank holiday... such a great bunch of people on here 😁.

 

So I will ignore as per the advice here.

 

Any ideas what will happen next ?

 

So my defence is in ,do I have to do anything else online on MCOL or do I just wait to hear from the court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should have gotten a letter or email from the court regarding them sending restons a copy?

have you not had that yet?

what date did you file?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I submitted my defence on the 16/05/2017 and have had a response from the court confirming.

Restons have also received my defence and responded with the N9 form.

 

Hope that makes sense to you and thank you again for replying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have had a letter back from Restons.

........

stated since the last payment date was the 06/04/2012 then my defence will be struck off and judgement made if I don't send of the N9 form within fourteen days.

 

that I should have sent proof if I disputed making the payments such as six months of bank statements from the date of payment.

 

Any ideas what my next step should be.

 

Well, they have to get something right, if only by the law of averages .......

So, if they are saying that you need to file the acknowledgment of service within the time limit, and then a defence [again, within its time limit] (else they can apply for a judgmnet by default), then that is correct.

 

But that doesn't mean (provided you get your AoS and then defence in, in time), that your defence would be struck out.

You then file a witness statement stating that you didn't make any such payment, and that the last payment you made was on or before . You then put them to strict proof otherwise ....

Since it is hard to prove you didn't make a payment, once you state you didn't, it is for them to prove that you did in fact male the payment (& if you didn't ... they won't be able to prove it, will they!)

 

What are the odds then when put to strict proof they'll discover it eas in fact a payment made with the strict proviso it was for a SAR and not to be used towards the balance (or similar), or the payment was meant for a different account, and was put to your account due to an 'admin error' (it seems that such 'admin errors' occur often for debts that would othrwise by statute barred .... who knew?).

 

I submitted my defence on the 16/05/2017 and have had a response from the court confirming.

Restons have also received my defence and responded with the N9 form.

 

Hang on. The N9 is the response pack.

N9B is the defence ...

http://formfinder.hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/n009b-eng.pdf

 

hmm, url not working on testing it, try : https://tinyurl.com/yah9nsjl

if you have submitted your defence, then Reston's already have that?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just read the court letter again..its says they have 28 days...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi Guys,

 

Posted a few months back and wondered if I could call on your help again.

 

To recap.

 

Defended a Debt as Statute Barred.

Claim now stayed for about eight months.

Received a printed copy of a CCA from Restons and Arrow along with copies of statements.

 

Here is the thing though.....The statements show the last payment to be 2009 so supports my defence.

They have stated in the letter that as now proof of ownerships has been established that I should pay the debt or they may have to look at continue with Court proceedings.

 

Do I need to reply to this or just sit and wait.

 

Any advice would be much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

not your call the claim is stayed

if rectums wanna waste paying money om the fee to lift the stay

you'll hear from THE COURT

till then

you can ignore anything else

 

helps if you read a few like threads too...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What’s a like thread?

 

Sorry to sound stupid,but maybe you mean don’t ask a question until you have read all the post on here in case it’s already been answered.

If so, sorry about that....must be a pain having to answer the same questions over and over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...