Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
    • Have to attend the hearing and present evidence of his financial position (income & expenditure) and  statements ,and agree an acceptable payment plan with the judges guidance.  It will be a form of redetermination hearing as already stated.The court will not agree to bailiffs if the financials do not reflect it or assetts are minimal. They just want to determine his true affordable disposable monthly figure....which will not be £10.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GWR - Miss leading ticket information


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2528 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I booked a ticket via the GWR website several months ago.

 

At the time of booking,

I specified my outward journey but not my return.

I purchased a ticket based on a journey that satisfied my outward requirements and that told me simply "Return journey: by 26 Jun 2017".

I received an email confirmation stating the same.

 

A few days ago I rang to book seats on the journeys

only to be told that I couldn't travel on the mid day journey back that I wanted on the ticket that I had bought (a super off peak) but would need to either wait a further 4 hours before I could get the first train that met the ticket criteria or pay a further £50 to do so (almost as much as my original ticket).

I was also told that if I did this on the day on the train, it would cost me £80 to quote "rectify my mistake".

 

I asked why was I not told at the time of booking that I would be limited to certain trains for my return journey and was told

"did I tick the terms and conditions box at the end of the transaction - because that explains the ticket types"

 

I find this HIGHLY miss leading and a near deliberate attempt to con travellers into having to pay more for their journeys when finding themselves on a train they apparently should not be travelling on.

 

I also asked if the difference in fair would have been cheaper had I paid the difference at the time and (due to my only finding this out a week before travel) was told it would have been significantly cheaper.

 

Anyone else feel this is miss leading too?

I would really like to complain about this practise to the highest I can - who should I send it too?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whenever I've booked tickets online, I've seen a variety of prices, along with a description of the ticket type, even if the details of what that type means aren't stated in flashing neon.

 

When you booked, did you see "Advance", "Anytime", and "off-peak" as well as "Super off-peak"?.

Did you think "Hey, an Anytime ticket seems much more expensive"?

"Off-peak ; that is cheaper, maybe it'll be restricted to off-peak"

"Super off-peak, even cheaper than off-peak.... I wonder why?"

 

http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/times_fares/ticket_types/46590.aspx

 

If you want to travel at peak times, with maximum flexibility as to trains ; you'll need to pay for an Anytime ticket.

If you want to travel at peak times but with a cheaper fare, look at 'Advance' fares (but you'll find they are valid for the booked service only, you won't be able to use it for an earlier service, and if you miss the booked train you will be ticketless).

 

With a week to go, look at getting a refund on your Super off-peak, and consider an off-peak (if that fits with your plans better), or if you must travel peak times, Advance fares.

 

I've found Virgin Trains' site to be best at giving the range of tickets (and their prices), when both outward and return trains are entered. Their app allows you to easily see what return trains the ticket type you have chosen is valid for, so you can see what return trains are allowed / dis-allowed.

 

Want an 'e-ticket'?. Try the website /app for the TOC (e.g. GWR) you'll be traveling on first. If it gives you the info you need, great. If not, use the Virgin app / site to find the right ticket and then buy it from the other TOC....

 

Going on to GWR's website, when I select a Super off-peak ticket, there is the 'i in a circle' information icon. Clicking on it:

"Super Off-Peak Return

Via Any Permitted Route

Ticket Description:

 

Off-Peak fares are cheaper tickets for travelling on trains that are less busy. You may be required to travel at specific times of day, days of the week or on a specific route."

 

Clicking on the potential return train times shows which trains are allowed / not allowed.

Super off-peak (unsurprisingly) is much more restricted than off-peak.

 

Check and see if an offer peak ticket (26% more expensive than a super off-peak for the example I tried, Plymouth to Paddington return) is an option for you.

(For that example, the latest afternoon train departs14;07, and the earliest evening train departs 19.03 for trains allowable for Super off-peak, some 5 hours of 'embargo' while for 'off-peak' the latest afternoon train departs16.36, and the earliest evening train departs 18.03, leaving only 1 1/2 hours peak time not permitted, and only the 17.03 service not allowed).

 

For that example (Plymouth / Paddington), traveling out super off-peak single, and back with an advance ticket might be an option.

£55 outward, and between £37 and £126 advance for the return (£126 for the peak 17.03 train, but £37 for the 18.35 ....).

£92 for both if you go for the 18.35 return is even cheaper than the Super off-peak return!.

 

I can't see that you have been misled, and doubt a complaint will get you very far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there are restrictions on a journey with GWR these are normally printed on the tickets. It might say that journeys via x station are excluded or ticket only covers journeys via x station. So if you tried to book seats on a train that stops at an excluded station or does not stop at the required station, then the ticket is not valid for the particular train.

 

It is complicated, but it is the way train companies try to restrict the route you can use the ticket for. It requires you to check the route of the train and what stations it stops at to see if your ticket is ok or not.

 

And people try to engineer cheaper tickets on one route and then use it on another. For example, it is far cheaper to buy a ticket from say Bristol to London via Gloucester than it is to just buy a ticket from Bristol to London but not via Gloucester. The train lines are split, with one route offering a faster route to destination and companies charge more for faster journeys.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see your points however to me the info button simply stating "You may be required to travel at specific times of day, days of the week or on a specific route." does not really tell me much (ie what times/routes) and as I hadn't yet collected the tickets I couldn't see if they said anything. My point is that it should be made clearer I guess

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is up to you to check. I have been in this situation a number of times. I had an argument with a guard on a train, as i had boarded a train using a cheaper ticket that was excluded. I had to pay the extra required. At another station, i had to wait over a hour for a another train.

 

What GWR will say is that if in doubt you should ask before boarding.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What GWR will say is that if in doubt you should ask before boarding.

 

And that is what I feel is miss leading - all I got was an email confirmation stating "Return journey: by 26 Jun 2017" - if this had said something along the lines of "Return journey: by 26 Jun 2017, subject to ticket restrictions, please check that your intended return journey is covered by this ticket" then I would have done just that..

Link to post
Share on other sites

You bought the ticket (and accepted the conditions) before you received the confirmation email.

How can you be misled (into buying the wrong ticket, if that is what you are claiming) by a confirmation that you only receive after purchase?.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

So nobody else feels that the train companies make buying a ticket over complicated and don't go far enough at the time of purchase to explain what ticket you are actually buying and what the restrictions of it are? I would be amazed if that were the case frankly

Link to post
Share on other sites

But experience tells most people that some tickets cannot be used on some services.

 

As an interesting point, i found searching recently that GWR allowed a cheap ticket to be used on a very early morning sevice, but then the same ticket type could not be used until after 9am. I presume on the route that very few wanted to travel at 6.20 am, but services between 7am and 9am at peak commutting time were very busy.

 

Before i travel i go to Trainline and put in the journey i am making to see when the ticket i purchased can be used. Yes sometimes at time of purchase it does not list what exact services it cannot be used on. Passengers have to check. Not great customer service, but that is the way they operate.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you really think "Super off-peak" wouldn't have ANY restrictions?

What did you do to check on any restrictions (like click the info icon, google "super off peak" or "GWR super off peak")?

 

https://www.gwr.com/plan-journey/tickets-railcards-and-season-tickets/ticket-types

 

and with a few minutes effort:

https://www.gwr.com/~/media/gwr/pdfs/your-journey/journey-information/gw150828-travelling-with-gwr.pdf?la=en

Which gives the restriction times for outbound and return trains for all of their services ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

its been this way for many many years

and with all rail companies on such tickets

 

 

if you don't read the T&C's sadly that's your problem

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...