Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. Cabot and old sav credit card debt.. looks like for years he was scammed by clarity credit management out of money. Nothing new there, thats all rhey ever did. No signed agreement, no nothing to prove the debt. Sav credit would never have had a signed agreement. Card will be 80's era if not close too. Unenforceable!!   2. Natwest duo MasterCard..now rbs..cabot. No signed agreement. unenforceable.   3.  An mbna card from about 1999/2000 idem dca scammers no signed agreement unenforceable   4. Some kind of lloyds credit card, with idem. Theres a signed application form but that does not meet the requirements as there are numerous prescribed terms on that missing . Unenforceable.   5. Some kind of rbs secondary? finance no idea what, no agreement. Unenforceable.   pers id be totally ignoring them on all those. just because he got cash cowed for far too many years running the sb date to infinity, makes no odds to any of them.   old school..got had blind from day one, aided and abetted by yet again one of the so called charities, there to help..not!!   Dx    
    • Djokovic may not be able to defend his French Open title this year, according to the sports minister. I thought one of their ministers, can't remember who, might have said otherwise during the problems in Australia but this doesn't sound unreasonable.   Djokovic’s French Open title defence in doubt after Covid pass ruling | Novak Djokovic | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM France rules all athletes will have to be vaccinated for sports events while French MP Stanislas Guerini says Novak Djokovic’s behaviour is...  
    • Youth Employment UK is growing and we are looking for three new team members to join us in our mission […]View the full article
    • Hi. On the spreadsheet, the interest payments only stopped in July 2019, I have not paid anything to them since 2011. CT is claiming that all deadlines to pursue a claim with the Ombudsman has long passed including the original claim for PPI to pay for the loan when off work due to ill health. The National Debt Line said I should ensure that I can provide the 'exceptional circumstances' why any deadlines should be ignored and they stressed would be key to the Ombudsman accepting the claim as valid. This backs up what CT are saying, no point in looking at your cliam further as the deadlines have passed - NOT with 'exceptional circumstances' it hasn't. My claim is for:  1. My mental health condition at the time the claim was made (they can not say they weren't aware of that as they refunded £1700 insurance fee). 2. When a PPI claim was made, they never really dealt with it but updated the credit file from 2013 to 2019 as 'settled' therefore I would be right in presuming the dept was in fact settled, they wrote on my credit file it was. 3. They then updated the file in 2019 with missed payments and added a long term debt of £24k to the file, which they refused to change in 2019, but did change in December 2021, all of which I have screenshots of. This caused me issues with credit as the score had flatlined for over two years until they did change it. 4. CT was deploying a deliberate attempt to 'buy time' to take me past the past six years deadline. After a long chat with Ombudsman, they have said my reasons for 'exceptional circumstances' are realistic and should be made as part of my claim. 5. My claim is for all of the 24k to be statute-barred/outstanding debt denied. 6. I am also seeking compensation for none payment of PPI and making it a condition of the loan acceptance and compensation for unlawful credit file entry causing considerable problems with seeking even simple basic credit such as mobile contracts. The claim is now with the Ombudsman and as long as I can overcome any issue with time limits, I will be fine and looking forward to nailing them to the rafters. I have received an email from the Ombudsman saying the claim has been received.
    • Excellent! It is what I was hoping a well phrased (and not too pushy) letter might result in. In the end, they want to encourage ticketed-travel.   By showing you never intended to evade your fare, and by accepting that you had made a mistake : opened the door to them thinking “we don’t need to punish this person, likely they won’t let it happen again”   Result. Well done, bet you are relieved!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

hoist sold 2 santander debts


mystirio
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1558 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

statute barred

send them that letter from the debt collection section of the library

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...