Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

log book loans - can i sell the car?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5152 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi everyone

 

i have been reading all your posts on this forum about log book loans for som months now. i have a loan on my car and wondered, can i sell the car to someone i know?

 

i plan to order a new v5, change the owner details and then 'hide' the car.

 

where do i stand legally here?

 

much obliged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

sounds a bit dodgy to me!!

BIRMINGHAM MIDSHIRES

1/09/06 SETTLED IN FULL

HALIFAX

7/09/06 SETTLED IN FULL

CAPITAL ONE

5/10/06 SETTLED IN FULL

NatWest

7/09/06 SETTLED IN FULL

ULSTER BANK

8/8/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

28/09/06 Prelim sent

18/09/07 Claim filed at court

Link to post
Share on other sites

The finance can only be secured on the car if the agreement is lawful which LBL's are not although they do unlawfully register a charge with HPI, which HPI should NOT allow to happen but then they are not interested in the legalities only the fees they earn. Apart from hp the only other lender who has a legal right to place a charge is a licensed pawn broker

Link to post
Share on other sites

The finance can only be secured on the car if the agreement is lawful which LBL's are not although they do unlawfully register a charge with HPI, which HPI should NOT allow to happen but then they are not interested in the legalities only the fees they earn. Apart from hp the only other lender who has a legal right to place a charge is a licensed pawn broker

 

Interesting - thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think before anyone accuses others of offering fraudulent advice they 1st make sure that is what is being offered in the 1st place

 

Hi Nellie

 

I intend to change the owner details, and then hide it but tell LBL I have sold it?

 

To clarify, the advice given might not have offered fraudulent advice, but the question asked certainly seems to indicate an intention to lie and deceive. The fact that no-one seems to disapprove could be easily construed as condoning the behaviour, and this is not something that will be tolerated on this forum, as some users already know.

 

Likewise, potentially libellous comments will be edited/deleted, as they put the forum owners at risk.

 

Thanks in advance for your cooperation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As they don't actually own the car what advice is being offered is an attempt to avoid LBL acting unlawfully by removing the goods which they don't own. So yes an attempt is being made to outwit them but none of it is illegal or dishonest in anyway & yes we want to help deceive them to stop them removing goods they have no right to. If a burglar entered your home wouldn't you attempt to deceive him.

 

Also a number of members have been advised to conceal their cars because we all know how this company acts

 

The member asked a perfectly legit question, could he sell the car & still be acting within the law & the answer is yes he can as he still owns it. He can even give it away if he chooses.

 

Also as the lawful owner he can tell them whatever he likes he still won't be breaking any laws. He can say he sold it to a guy in a pub if he wishes. The only proviso is that he informs the DVLA of it's disposal & to whom

 

As for the alleged debt LBL will have to go to court to try & get their agreement enforced

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep reclaim thr right is advocated as you rightly point out.Thats what the consumer action group stands for

Nothing wrongwith that.......

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Just to mention its illegal to sell something that is not yours to sell firstly, whilst the HP stands for the vehicle the debt is always with you. If you sell to a friend under these circumstances he/she soon will not be your friend.

If you hide it or Shankill Road it ( i would pay to see that as well ) the debt is still yours. If they cannot find the car or bus or whatever, of which they know will turn up again sooner or later, you still must pay.

The only way to get rid as I am led to believe is you tell them that you are not paying another penny, they will come and take car back, auction it somewhere and then if they are honest deduct the money from what you owe and then you will still have to pay the remaining dues.

 

Sorry for sticking my bit but its just happened to a friend of mine.

 

Mikey

Keep claiming the right

 

Mikey

 

If you find that I have helped in anyway please click on the scales to left of the screen- Thank you

 

Advice & opinions of Scouser9 are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

 

50% Of claim offered by The Halifax 09/12/2006

LBA letter sent 11/12/2006

Refusal in part of Payment sent 12/12/2006

Halifax settled with £4200 agreed amount 27/12/2006

Survey Submitted and Donation Made 02/01/2007

PPI Claim Sent To Halifax 25/11/2008

PPI Claim Halifax Won 31/12/2008

PPI Claim Sent To Carcraft 22/12/2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree, its illegal to sell a car thats on HP and the loan will always be secured on the car regardless of ownership of that car. The point is that LBL finance is not an HP agreement nor is it secured on the car, they claim ownership over the car by way of agreements that are unlawfull and unenforcable, they repossess cars with no court order and this is against the law.

If you think I have helped hop on the scales. If I was useless best to keep quiet me thinks:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just let me get this right, and please correct me if I am wrong, as I don't pretend to know all the ins and out of car ownership and documentation :

 

OP is proposing to apply to the DVLA for a new logbook. Unless I'm mistaken, he/she would have to have a reason to do so. So OP is going to have to lie to the DVLA.

 

Reclaim the right, yes, but not "by beating them at their own game". Stay within the law, and use the law to your advantage. I am taking a fair guess that lying to the DVLA in order to obtain new documents doesn't come within spitting distance of that definition.

 

It has been proven that Banks take Charges unlawfully and is the basis for this forum, LBL take cars unlawfully so It should be viewed on the same principle.

 

Yes, we do. And we win by taking them to court, by giving them a chance to prove they are acting lawfully, which they decline and capitulate instead.

 

We keep the moral high ground at all times. I would strongly recommend anyone dealing with LBL does the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just let me get this right, and please correct me if I am wrong, as I don't pretend to know all the ins and out of car ownership and documentation :

 

OP is proposing to apply to the DVLA for a new logbook. Unless I'm mistaken, he/she would have to have a reason to do so. So OP is going to have to lie to the DVLA.

 

Reclaim the right, yes, but not "by beating them at their own game". Stay within the law, and use the law to your advantage. I am taking a fair guess that lying to the DVLA in order to obtain new documents doesn't come within spitting distance of that definition.

 

 

 

Yes, we do. And we win by taking them to court, by giving them a chance to prove they are acting lawfully, which they decline and capitulate instead.

 

We keep the moral high ground at all times. I would strongly recommend anyone dealing with LBL does the same.

 

I first just want to say that I asked OP's intentions before I offered advice to him and I have made no comment about obtaining the logbook from DVLA nor have I advised him to do so. I am not responsible for his intentions, all I was doing was informing him of what I know about this company through my own personal experience with them.

 

I have never acted outside the Law and I am taking them to court to claim back what is rightfully mine. I have also kept the moral high ground even when kicked in the face by this company and am doing things by the book, in a legal and dignified manner.

 

'Beating them at their own game' in my understanding does not involve any dishonest or illegal actions, its simply 'knowing your rights' and fighting back. The problem with this company is that they repossess cars without the legal right to do so leaving people with nowhere to turn to, I am able to give advice because I know this for a fact.

 

I understand and respect your comments but no advice was given by anyone to deceive or act unlawfully apart from lighthearted comments which where said in jest.

If you think I have helped hop on the scales. If I was useless best to keep quiet me thinks:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

OK, I have moved house now, totally out of the blue.

 

Good luck in finding me and the car LBL!!!

 

This is for all the people that have been shafted by LBL - you wont get my car hahahahaha!!!

 

Good luck to everyone who is dealing with these idiots

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DEATHLORD

Hi every one sates LBL loans are not worth the paper there on I have questions on this,

HOW

hAS ANY ONE WON ANY CASES AGAINST THEM

LOG BOOK LOANS DOES NOT LOAN MONEY its other companies though them. therefore does the company lending have a lic for this? or do they use the other companies Credit Lic?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi every one sates LBL loans are not worth the paper there on I have questions on this,

HOW

hAS ANY ONE WON ANY CASES AGAINST THEM

LOG BOOK LOANS DOES NOT LOAN MONEY its other companies though them. therefore does the company lending have a lic for this? or do they use the other companies Credit Lic?.

 

They can't.........If they are lending money their name has to be on the CCL............even if they are subsidiary.................'trading as'......Also if the separate company making the lending decisions is other than LBL (or named subsidiary or even if using LBL's funds) then they must have a CCL in their own right

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi everyone, my hsband and i are in the same boat with LBL we have come up with an idea but not able to share with anyone as it may not be legal. Anyway last night i was doing a bit of research on the net looking at log book loans did any of you know there are at least 2 LBL companies but if you go on there website and click on there company number you can look at few details not much i looked at company credit search some of it is less than favourable for £18.00 you can look at a script about striking off maybe someone as tried this. also if you look at another company loans4logbooks.co.uk they keep eveything logbook insurance document and mot certificate without these they cant claim the vehicle if needed. maybe f enough of us shouted the office of fair trading could look into this company also as anyoneactually ben served with a court order to regain posession of the vehicle by log book loans i thought it had to be done by court of the area of residence of customer. our rep told us about a bloke in london wo had 50,000 loa and never paid and they never got the car back ever. makes you think dont it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats interesting, something really does need to be done about these people. We only took out £1000, I missed 2 £40 payments & it was put straight onto Gemini Bailiffs! Now we are paying £100 a week to these people until we've paid back the full £2600!!!!!! :mad: :mad: The thing is though, i never gave them my log book, insuarance, MOT or anything so do they really have a right to take my car?? I'm actually planning on moving house soon, as soon as that happens they car whistle for the rest, I could actually afford 2 mortgages for what I pay these cowboys!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats interesting, something really does need to be done about these people. We only took out £1000, I missed 2 £40 payments & it was put straight onto Gemini Bailiffs! Now we are paying £100 a week to these people until we've paid back the full £2600!!!!!! :mad: :mad: The thing is though, i never gave them my log book, insuarance, MOT or anything so do they really have a right to take my car?? I'm actually planning on moving house soon, as soon as that happens they car whistle for the rest, I could actually afford 2 mortgages for what I pay these cowboys!!!

 

if you never gave them the log book then thy need to take you to small claims court same as provident surely did they not ask for copies of log book ins or mot cert, if it were me i would drop the payments but first go see cab or a solicitor on a free 30 min appoint,go for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...