Jump to content


HPH2/Cohen claimform - old Barclaycard debt***Claim dismissed***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

CPR 31.14 is a civil request so they are not compelled to respond......its the CCA request thats the killer...no compliance...no enforcement.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Not sure if they wont appear...normally the none receipt of their witness statement is a good indication whether they will attend any hearing...just make sure you submit your statement and disclosure on time then you have another fault to add to your request to strike out..none compliance with court directions.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. First draft.

 

 

Some cut n paste from other B/card statements and I have already seen a couple of amendments to make, but in principle, this is where I am with it.

 

 

Looking how to upload the PDF now. Thanks... be back soon with the doc

 

1st draft WS here

HPH2 witness statement_Redacted.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

ouch far far to much waffle.?

 

better to copy it as text here so it can be edited as well rather than an attached file.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite a good attempt at a witness statement IMHO...so okay hold it there for now...what date should you receive the claimants witness statement?...we have seen hearing fees paid before and no witness statement or disclosures ever materialising and then of course the claim discontinued or simply the claimant fails to show.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX & Andy. Happy to place a text copy too. The court date is 7 July and the requirement is 14 days prior for serving each other and the court, so 23rd by my math. Nothing received from HC/HPH2/Robbers since the "holding" note one month ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks...so we keep that date in mind and wait.....hold off submitting the witness statement until the death.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Duly submitted to both.

 

HPH2 witness statement received by email too. Looks a decent effort to me. Not convinced by the dates though - 1993. Need to work on that. Its a fiche copy so I imagine the original is not in existence. Do you want a redacted copy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes please one multipage pdf upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless the DN was sent 1st class

that's another classic case of the faulty mercers DN syndrome.

 

and the usual 620000 set of T&C's

probably not relevant for the date of the DN or major change? of the agreement.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Started to make some notes that hopefully correlates to your views.

 

1. The Mercers DN. Does not have my home address on and is sent to a company that I am a director of. The DN is headlined as a default under s87(i) not 87(1) - is that still significant?. No assignment notice from B/c to Mercers.

 

2. Copy Agreement. Thats a fiche copy/scan copy. I doubt there is an original and as noted, dubious about the signature.

 

3. Copy statements. 3 of the 6 Have the same address and title "XX Ltd" as the DN.

The DN is dated 8 Aug 2011 yet statement 4 dated June shows a smaller balance due by £600ish.

The statement dated March 2013 shows a nil balance due.

Assignment to MKDP wasn't until Aug 2013.

 

That help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

mercers are bc!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so forget the notice of assignment you mention above

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

mostly already in other Barclaycard claims that have gone this far

the 620000 T&C's are what they roll out for every court claim

they are from the hoist filing cabinet and just paste your name/AD on line one.

if they mean anything is very debatable.

and statements don't prove anything either.

 

 

page 6 the 1993 application form does appear to have any prescribed terms on it at all?

and no reference to where these are so makes the sig useless

 

 

and 7+8 T&C cant be to do with the application form

those would have been sent with a copy of the actual agreement for you to sign and return.

it would state bank copy stamped on it.

 

 

they are hoping to spoof the judge they meet CCa requirements

they don't.

no SIGNED agreement.

that app form does not count.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you could also post up page 1 of the claimants witness statement and also Im not sure if you have noticed but the figures have changed in the WS compared to the original particulars.

 

1. The claim is for the sum of £8489.40 in respect of monies owing under an agreement with the account no. 1234567890 pursuant to The consumer crediticon Act 1974.

The debt was legally assigned by MKDP LLP (ex Barclaycard) to the Claimant and notice has been served.

 

2.The defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the Agreement.

A default notice has been served upon the Defendant pursuant to s.87(1) CCA.

 

The Claimant claims.

1. £8449.40

2. Interest pursuant to s69 of the county courticon Act 1984 at a rate of 8.00 percent from 22/05/13 to the date hereof 1324 days is the sum of £2463.57 Should be restricted to 12 months not 4 years

3. Future interest accruing at the daily rate of £1.86

4. Costs

 

What is the value of the claim? £11545.85

 

WS Figures

 

£10,952 original debt inc section 69 interest

£331.08 section 69

Commencement charge £592.88

 

Addition hearing fee £335.00 which is correct

 

Total £12,211,93

 

Point 2 of their WS states that the balance was £10.952.97 which includes section 69 interest ..yet in the final list they add it again a further £335.00

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...