Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unbelievably I can't find it, I will have a really good look for it when I have a bit more time on my day off this week. AS a side note, I emailed them offering a token payment to settle the account and avoid court action, which unsurprisingly they have declined. However there reply states:  A Claim was accepted on 19 June 2024 which means we cannot set up a payment plan just yet. You should have received a claims pack from the Court. We would ask for this to be completed with your offer of repayment and returned to either ourselves or the Court.  You have 21 days for this to be completed and returned in order to avoid a Judgment by Default. This means we would need to receive this by 10 July 2024. I was under the impression it was 19 days from date on the claim form. which was the 14th, which would be 3rd July. Could I use this against them as it seems like they are giving me false information in the hope of getting a judgement by default?
    • when is your mediation? honestly I don't think that the ups case is much use actually because it concerns third party rights BUT  as we know now the contract for packlink is direct and there are no third parties rights at all so you don't need it, and frankly the really helpful one will be from @occysrazor case but I don't know if they have it. expect evris mediation to be a complete fail yes
    • jk2054: I have ensured there's not reference to the third party rights in the updated letter of claim. BankFodder: thanks for the edits and information. I understand the Consumer Rights Act prohibits EVRi's attempts to avoid liability in their duty and care of accepting to deliver my parcel according to Section 57.  They have accepted to carry my parcel even though I have identified it as a laptop and specified the value so they must take reasonable care to deliver the parcel or face the consequences if it were lost as it seems to be in my case! I hadn't originally referenced Section 72 because of EVRi didn't offer any insurance whether free or for me to purchase. I understand that if I were to have any sort of insurance from EVRi then Section 72 refer to the rules of such secondary contracts. Is this section indicating that the insurance may reduce my rights or remedies to recourse to full compensation if I had been offered and purchased such insurance?  Is it beneficial to include this in the letter of claim (and subsequently reference both Section 57 and 72 in the MCOL?) although it might not be pertinent in my case?  Perhaps this is just to reinforce that in general EVRi and other couriers are taking such liberties with their customers so it is to send a message that they are breaching both sections? I made a few minor edits to the letter of claim but mainly grammatical type stuff and to keep consistent font, black colour, but the edits you provided are included and are extremely helpful and are putting me in a good position to email and post the letter to EVRi this week and get the ball rolling. Thanks. Evri letter of claim.pdf
    • Thank you for getting back to me I will do my best to get hold of the claim form tomorrow  When I spoke to MCOl on friday I asked for the extra 14 days so penty of time Onlymeagain
    • Hi, From everything I've read about how EVRi handle mediation, and given I intend not to budge on my position, I am preparing for court. Having read the the full WS and court bundl @occysrazor kindly supplied, I am wondering what value adding the Jamie Bradbury v UPS Limited has?  Obviously this case was lost by the claimant and the ruling clearly goes against the Farooq case and more recently @occysrazor's.  Is the case to include it simply to showcase my argument as being well rounded? Interested in your opinions. Many thanks, Sam 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

XS Direct 3k Total Excess - Worried regarding Debt Collectors


Jayden1994
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2095 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Wondered if anyone could help or offer some advice as I am in quite a stressful situation at the moment and this forum has been very helpful in the past.

 

I was recently involved in an accident on the 5th April 2017, I am technically at fault as I went into the rear of someone at around 15-20mph, put Pedestrians went to cross a zebra crossing and the car on approach slammed his brakes early in realization of this and that forced the car in front of me to slam his and I was unable to break in time leading me to go into the back of this vehicle.

 

Aside from me asking if we can handle the incident privately he still decided to claim through insurance after agreeing with my verbally to handle it privately.

 

My insurance (Insure Your Motor) has an excess of 3k,

they will not ask me for whatever the estimation is below that and ask me to pay as I am at fault most likely...

 

 

I am worried as I simply cannot afford any of these payments in my current situation and just wanted to find out what the following steps were.

 

 

Do they get debt collectors to try and retrieve this...

Is there any way feasibly right that I can somehow not have to pay such a ridiculous excess or is there any way I'd be able to get my way out of the debt collectors at a later stage?

 

I had no other choice but to go with these insurers with 3k Compulsory excess as every other price at the time was above the £300 figure a month and this one was £247 monthly.

 

Any help or advice would be appreciated

 

Apologies for the essay

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 170
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

So this excess applies to all claims, even liability to third parties ?

 

If this is true, i am surprised it complies with requirements under Road Traffic Acts. Perhaps the Insurers pay out to the third party the amount due and they come after you for up to £3k. It would be same as any other debt. Debt collection letters requesting payment and then eventually they would go for a CCJ, which they would seek to enforce.

 

The other issue is that if you did not enter into a repayment arrangement with the Insurers, is that they would most likely cancel your policy. This would make getting future Insurance difficult and much more expensive. Probably best to seek full information of the loss the Insurers want you to pay and seek to enter into a repayment arrangement over a necessary period, which might be several years.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

just remember debt collectors ARE NOT BAILIFFS

and have

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS

whatever the debt is

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea all liability including third party damages which they will come after for in the coming weeks, Dependant on what the estimated damage comes in at from the third party which after assessing it myself and asking around should come in at 1000-1500.

 

So they will ask me for this amount and said I can retain my no claims if i pay it off.

 

Would there be no way out of the debt collectors as I'm sure extra fees would be added which would go against regulations etc would it not? Allowing me to somehow argue my way out ?

 

I simply cannot afford that amount right now

 

Thanks for the reply I really do appreciate it by the way

 

Kind Regards

 

just remember debt collectors ARE NOT BAILIFFS

and have

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS

whatever the debt is

 

 

dx

 

So you reckon I'd be able to fight myself out of it as I have experience of getting out of debt collectors before ?

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

you simply ignore them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you misunderstand what will happen. It will be a claim against your policy, affecting your no claims discount.

 

Your Insurers will pay the third party and it will be a debt your Insurers chase you for.

 

You could of course ignore them, but the consequences might make it worse.

 

Cancelled Insurance on your record and a CCJ.

 

What you don't know yet is whether the third party intends on making a personal injury claim.

 

So you can't really just opt to pay the third party and ask your Insurers to stop being involved.

 

This could be a £10k claim with personal injury included.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speak to the claims handler about your concerns. I don't think they will remove your claim in regard to no claims discount, if you managed to settle the third parties claim direct with them.

 

 

The third party has 3 years to register a personal injury claim, so there is still a risk, even if currently the third party has not indicated an injury.

 

Personally, i think you let the Insurers settle the claim and agree a repayment over a period of time, provided no interest or charges added.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was recently involved in an accident on the 5th April 2017, I am technically at fault as I went into the rear of someone at around 15-20mph, put Pedestrians went to cross a zebra crossing and the car on approach slammed his brakes early in realization of this and that forced the car in front of me to slam his and I was unable to break in time leading me to go into the back of this vehicle.

 

So, perhaps the front car MIGHT have been able to get across the zebra safely (& legally).

Even so, the car in front of you would almost certainly have had to stop (but may have braked later than they actually did).

 

You'd still have had to brake (so perhaps with one car length's space extra available, but you may have seen the braking later ......)

 

So, if you hit them at 15-20, do you think you would have avoided the collision if the front car hadn't had braked, and how is you hitting the car in front only "technically" your fault?

 

Are you saying that you had left adequate space to allow for your reaction time and braking time?

If not : how is this not your fault?

If so : how come you still hit them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically as I rear ended someone and that usually goes down as a fault but In my opinion people are never driving at entirely safe distances they should be driving at because that's just not how most function anymore, Everyone's rushing etc, But yes, End of the day its my fault as I SHOULD have retained a safe distance.

 

I'm just looking for solutions or the best possible way to get through this situation as my financial situation right now does not permit me to pay anything back in the slightest...

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your Insurer is XS Direct, they explain how they collect the excess and how they approach the matter if you cannot afford to pay the excess.

 

Your broker / agent is duty bound to make very clear any significant exclusions / excesses etc to you before you purchase cover, I have seen a few cases where the XS Direct £3000 excess was not made clear that it applies to third party claims. If this is genuinely the case with you then we may be able to help you with a complaint against your broker / agent

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is XS Direct & that is genuinely the case, I had no idea it applied to third party claims as well, I simply thought if I wanted to claim for my own vehicle it applied which makes more sense to me...

 

What should be my next steps ?

 

Appreciate the reply as well

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you still have access to the quote and if so does it make it clear that the excess applies to third party claims.

 

Does the paper work they sent you make it clear the excess applies to third party claims

 

Did they point out to you on the phone that the £3k excess applies to third party claims

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I do not still have access to it via the quote on the comparison site

 

And the paperwork states £3000 all sections excess for all drivers, But that's not clarifying at all for a new driver who pretty much needs to see "applies to third party claims"

 

I do not recall the phone conversation at all either I'm afraid

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are posters on here that will be better at advising you on whether or not the policy was miss sold to you or not.

 

It may help them if you could post up the relevant paperwork you have eg the "Summary of Cover" / "Key Facts" and any other paper work you have that refers to the excess

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jayden

 

Dacouc highlights what your next step is, which is to get hold of information, which might help to prove miss selling.

 

You can get the information from the comparison site about the quote you had via them. Just contact their customer services.

 

In regard to your Insurers, suggest you send them a subject access request for copies of everything. If you spoke to them, you can also ask them for a copy of the recording of the call, if they still have it. In the request make sure you specifically list what you want to see, otherwise they will just print off their computer data.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to make it clear to you, if you have been miss sold the policy and you complain to the Ombudsman, if the Ombudsman (FOS) agree then they will force the broker / agent to put you in the same financial position you would have been if you had not been if the policy had not been miss sold.

 

This is likely to mean that the £3000 excess applying to claims against you from third parties would not be applied.

 

It is therefore worth you looking into the matter.

 

I have seen a lot of people on various forums in a similar position to you, a decision by the Ombudsman on this matter could be very helpful to so many people.

 

I am of the opinion that this type of policy should not be sold via a comparison site where people in effect are only concerned at purchasing the cheapest policy of which one with a £3k excess for third party claims is frequently going to be the cheapest. It is incredibly important that such sales make it very very clear to a consumer what their excess is and in what circumstances they will pay it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree. But Jayden do not rush into making the FOS complaint. Obtain all of the information first and if you find that you were never told explicitly that the excess applied to third party claims, then make the FOS complaint.

 

The FOS have changed their processes over the last year or so, in order to speed up the complaint process. If you rush into a complaint without the evidence needed to support your complaint, you are likely to be fobbed off quickly. They won't spend months looking into something, based on you just being unhappy, when you don't have much to justify the complaint.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, the OP needs to get his ducks in a row first.

 

But I struggle to see how this policy was "missold." It's become a bit of a buzzword when really the OP took a gamble on a cheap policy which didn't end well for him.

 

More of a poor choice and buyers remorse by the OP than any miselling from what I've read so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off I'd honestly like to thank everyone for the time taken to give me this information and these replies, It is very much appreciated.

 

I will attach any documents I received when I took the quote out that mention excess to see what you guys think and meanwhile I will try and get hold of the telephone call as well at the time in addition to the actual quote I received via the comparison site.

 

Here's a link for every PDF I could find on the matter of excess that they emailed me after I took the quote out:

http://imgur.com/a/3Wju9

 

Please let me know your thoughts as when I looked at it, It's not made clear to new drivers that they'd have to pay third party claims as they'd assume this is covered from the huge monthly fee's they already pay but it would make sense you'd have to pay for claims on your own vehicle...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your only chance is to make an argument under unfair trading law and to get specific advice. When you buy Insurance online, you can normally go to the Insurers site to read the policy wording. Failing that, you have a 14 day cooling off period after receiving the documents to study the terms and to reject the policy. This is what the policy says on page 5.

 

All Sections Excess –

 

no alteration to protection provided

 

Under the Road Traffic Act, a person may not use a car in a public place unless there is an approved Policy of insurance in force. The Underwriters may however insert conditions in the Policy which limit or restrict the liability of the Underwriters to the Policyholder. However, there is no reduction in the protection provided by the Underwriters to the Policyholder in relation to their liability against claims from third parties as a result of the use of the car. The excess is valid between the Underwriters and the Policyholder as long as this does not affect any person entitled to recover damages in accordance with the Road Traf c Act. Therefore, in the event of a third party claim, the Underwriters will remain liable but the Underwriters are entitled to recover up to the excess amount from the Policyholder.

 

The argument under unfair trading law might well be that the Insurers are by contract entering you into a future possible credit debt obligation, just by having an accident with a third party. Neither the Insurers or the comparison site provided any clear explicit upfront warning of this and you believe it to be unfair. The reason that it is unfair is that most people buying Insurance would believe they had full excess free cover against third party claims and if this Insurance was totally different there should be a clearer upfront warning.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you think there is no point in attempting an FOS complaint ?

 

Its a lot to take in, How would I go about arguing this case ?

 

I spoke with my claims handler earlier just to receive an update on what was happening and was told they had not received a bill yet but have been told that a hire car was taken out for around 3 weeks which is just absurd so they told me to expect a pretty big bill and that's before the third party damages bill comes in...

 

Obviously I am panicking as I don't want to be taken to court over this when none of this was made clear to a new driver at the start

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...