Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

barclaycard - paid off March 2012 - sold to Link 2016 - threatened with solicitors 2017 ?


sweenstar
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2408 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I think the debt was cleared way back in Feb 2012 as suggested in the statements they continued to send for 2 years. (Barclaycard)

 

Link will pass the debt onto their solicitors who will apply to the county court to get the debt put before a judge (that is what they done with the last debt that was passed to them)

 

I will ask them to show me what evidence they have ( not sure of the terminology ) before it is put in front of the judge

 

Has any one been to court with Link before ?

 

I have read from other threads that in some situations the claimant has not even turned up

 

I am confident no credit agreement exists

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

1000's of people have been to court with link.

 

no good you thinking it was paid of as it wasn't

 

can you scan up the statements you have to ONE PDF please

follow the upload

 

they don't just get it before a judge

it has to go through the correct process

 

just because you let them fleece you last time

don't think this time they'll win.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ta

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

chgroff means they sold It on - you didn't pay it off.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there Dx,

 

So you think they sold it off in Feb 2012 (possibly to Mercers as that is who they have as sending me a default letter in Jan 2012) but notified me by letter in Ocoter 2016 that it was sold to Link ?

 

Will this debt drop off my credit report in Feb 2017 (first date of default) regardless of whether I pay it off in full, offer a partial settlement or wait for it to be statute barred ?

 

My credit score is a dismal 530 atm :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SS,

 

Yes, the records you've shown suggest BC sold the a/c March 2012.

 

If they issued a Default Notice promptly when the account went delinquent, then the debt should drop off your CRA files 6 years plus 2 or 3 months after the DN.

 

If they were late sending out a DN, or didn't send one at all, the debt should disappear 6 years plus 2 or 3 months after the account went delinquent.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there Dx,

 

So you think they sold it off in Feb 2012 (possibly to Mercers as that is who they have as sending me a default letter in Jan 2012) but notified me by letter in Ocoter 2016 that it was sold to Link ?

 

Will this debt drop off my credit report in Feb 2017 (first date of default) regardless of whether I pay it off in full, offer a partial settlement or wait for it to be statute barred ?

 

My credit score is a dismal 530 atm :(

 

mercers are BC's internal DCA

 

you really need to start reading up

you've so much to learn.

you've been here since 2014 too.

 

the account will vanish from your credit file never to return on the defaults 6th birthday

no matter what you do.

 

doesn't mean its not owed mind, till it reaches statute barring date.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all,

 

I think the best thing to do is get Link to backdate my credit file to show the default date as of Feb 2012 (do you agree)

and then as you say, around Feb of 2017 I will apply to have it statute barred and it will disappear (if it drags on that long) ..

....then roll on the good times .

...my credit file will be as good as new.....

 

I have had a reply from Link today saying

"As you know we purchased your debt from Barclaycard in October 2016 and as such we do not hold the original agreement,

we will however request the original agreement from Barclaycard along with the most recent terms and conditions and send them to you, this may take up to 30 days"

 

So I will be interested to see what they actually produce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it will vanish feb 2018!

 

pers id not be doing anything

simply invites letter tennis

theres nothing you can do

nor can do in moving the DN date

it is correct.

 

unless you can prove your last payment date [as we now know you didn't pay it off]

was months befoe then?

 

and if you could

then the complaint would goto BC

a debt buyer/DCA cannot default an account

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You sure that's not an updated date but that the default date is still Feb 2012?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes according to my latest credit file the debt only appears in October 2016 (Owner as Link)

- no closed accounts leading up to that date either ! - (Noodle),

 

 

I have a credit report from 2014 (Noodle) and it appears on there as being in default from Feb 2012 onward (Owner as Barclaycard), which ties in with the default letter I have from Mercers form Jan 2012.

 

Still doesn't explain what happened to the debt from Feb 2012 when it was effectively zeroed

- (2 years of subsequent £0 statements) and October 2016 when it was sold to Link ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

already explained the last bit several times...........

Barclays might have written if off it 2012 against tax/insurance and put it on a debt selling portfolio, but a buyer did buy it until recently

the money is still owed.

 

 

now the credit file..

it's no unusual for Plink to pull these stunts.

but you've a chance here to get it removed completely and confirm the SB date

but we need to know YOUR last payment or usage.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So a true default date should be may-aug 2012 if mercers issued a default notice which was not complied with. It should therefore go from your file no later than Aug 2018 (aug 2017 if in scotland).

 

If you do nothing, this will blight your credit file, as you say till oct 2022 which is grossly unfair.

 

As you have the statements you can compile a CISheet to calculate all the charges levied on the account plus compound interest and get claiming them back. In addition you can demand that the default is registered correctly or removed. This tho may well require issuing proceedings in the county court but may be the only way to get it corrected.

 

Assume that you have CCA'd Link?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry,

 

I misread my credit report, although the debt only starts with link in October 2016 at the top when I clicked the drop down it does say :-

 

Date of default 28/02/2012, so they must well be aware that it defaulted in Feb 2012.

 

:behindsofa:

 

Yes I have CCA'D them and they responded saying they dont have the data but they will contact Barclaycard and get it off them but this may take 30 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

doh! thought so...

yet another schoolboy mistake...

 

 

so time to ignore plink totally and get reclaiming.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope reclaiming does not rest the SB clock as its them paying you.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You in scotland sweenstar?

 

If so its already SB

 

If not then its Feb 2018 till it drops off yr file

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

No i'm in England, what about if I sent them a letter worded as such :-

 

I write with reference to the alleged money owed on the above account.

I take no responsibility for this alleged debt and consider the account to be in dispute. I also consider the alleged credit agreement un-enforceable.

However, as a gesture of goodwill I would like to offer you the sum of £1050.00 only.

This sum is on the strict understanding that it is in full and final settlement of the alleged debt and that neither you nor any associate company will take any further action to pursue this debt in any way whatsoever and that I will be released from any liability.

I also request that, if accepted, you will mark any entry on a credit reference agency file relating to the above account as "satisfied" in full.

I hope you will consider this to be fair and responsible settlement and on receipt of your signed acceptance, I will make arrangements for payment within the next 14 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why?

 

 

so they've sent an enforceable agreement?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No They haven't, I am waiting for that but when they started harassing me with letters I sent them what I though was a fair offer (letter above) but they turned it down any way. I was not aware of the statute bar .......

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...