Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Reply from Marquis... I've googled Globalim and it looks like they are an insurance company, first I've heard of them. I'd probably accept the £421. But surely my claim is against Marquis not the insurance whoever they are.   Good afternoon Mr Desnos   I have discussed your case, we have contacted Global on your behalf to see if the cost as per your attachment can be claimed back. They have agreed to refund you but you will have to send the invoice direct to them to claim the £421.42. Please send the invoice to  <Claims.L@globalim.co.uk> on your e mail state that Jackie Ord has discussed the case on the 23/9 any problems let me know. We cannot do this for you it has to be between the customer and Global Mr Desnos.   During the course of our conversation you made the decision to take the van yourself to Truma, the offer was always there in relation to bringing the van back, at some point we would have probably taken the van to truma regardless. The warranty is a back to base and we do not offer fuel compensation so on this occasion we will not be refunding you the £80.00. In relation to the mobile technician again we cannot refund as all works have to be undertaken back at base.   You mention about the waste water pipe, off course we will rectify this at your convenience, please give one of my girls on the front desk a call to get this booked in.   With reference to the mileage issue, I have discussed this today and one of my colleagues will be in touch to discuss further.   I hope this helps   Kind regards
    • Hi and thanks for your reply. I ask myself this every day at the moment but it really is essentially due to not being able to find this spec or even close for the money.  I work in laptop/phone repairs and one thing I do know is even if I looked at another brand such as Lenovo which is the closest to this one, the Dell is made a lot better and with much more reparability options.  More Lenovos are written off vs Dells for instance due to logic board failures.  And that really is the bottom line that anything/where else I would be taking a serious drop in spec or a serious (£1000+ ) increase in cost.   Since the last update, he did get back to me with more bad news that apparently they are still receiving returns with the same issue and so it would be another month before they know whether the right parts are in stock to build a new one for me.  Or they have given me "as exception" an option for a refund.   I have once again given them the option of letting me buy another one of these and if this is good, they simply refund me the new price (much higher than I paid for at around £700 currently) and take the old one back.  If not, I can try one more purchase and by then, if its still bad, we are in their 1 month wait timeline and a final decision maybe for a refund can be made then.   As for consumer vs business - unsure.  But I have asked Dell live chat if a consumer can purchase a Precision for personal use and they said yes, they just put my name in the company field instead of a company and this is what was done looking at my invoice for the system.    The reason I push this is almost everyone I know who had the issue (via another forum) and this was around 30-40 threads maybe? have now got a replacement laptop with the revised part and less and less are now complaining about their new purchase being faulty which clearly suggests new sales seem to be good but technical keep going through the same delayed route.   Hopefully this answers your queries - I honestly think if there is an equal or better option, I would have taken it by now and I'm only loyal and patient to a point!      
    • Nor do I but it isn't something I would allow myself to get hung up about. If you don't mind me saying you do have quite a pronounced populist political view. It's not my thing at all, I don't give a damn about class.    
    • Browse: Benefits - GOV.UK View the full article
    • Hello Thank you DX,    that's the one I used mainly and posted what I think it should look like.   How does that read or is it complete rubbish and I need to try again? I know I have to submit ASAP now so getting anxious 
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 4 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

Caught twice on same motorway in less than 20 minutes by speed cameras of 2 different police forces.


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1247 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Received 2 NIPs from different police forces after being caught by speed cameras, one in one force area, the 2nd in another force area. Was continuing a journey on the same motorway in the middle of the night, temp roadworks - unmanned - speed not excessive but over the limit, but each one was within the speed thresholds.

 

One force offered me a speed awareness course, but the other refused and instead issued me with the more severe *Conditional Offer Of Fixed Penalty*, i.e. £100 fine plus 3 points.

 

I did the course, cost me £76. I contend that the other force should not have issued me with the conditional fixed penalty and that both offences were only seen as separate because - unknowingly to me - the 2 speed cameras were in different force areas, even although I was still on the same motorway.

Seems excessive punishment and a technicality is being used in order to deny me another speed awareness course offer, i.e. that only one can be done every 3 years.

 

I've checked all the guidelines and the force in question has apparently breached them. I now stand to get a court summons because I've refused to accept the *COOFP* and would claim that both offences should not be separate but ought to be seen as one only.

 

Seems like they want two bites of the same cherry? A tricky one where it seems as if their guidelines can't cope with my circumstances, so instead of either treating them as a continuation of the first offence, or taking no action,

they seem hell bent on prosecuting me.

 

Any thoughts ??

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

How far apart were the speed cameras?

20 minutes apart means that they're going to argue you have breached the speed limit on more than one occasion, unless you say that you kept over the limit for the 20 minutes and it is the same offence.

Tricky one, I wonder what other more expert caggers think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How fast. How far apart.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I've checked all the guidelines and the force in question has apparently breached them. I now stand to get a court summons because I've refused to accept the *COOFP* and would claim that both offences should not be separate but ought to be seen as one only.

 

 

Which guideline have they breached??

 

Are the alleged offences for the same location at the same time?

 

Are you saying if you get caught by the same camera every day for a week it is the same offence merely because it is the same place, although at different times.....

Or if caught by a camera in London and in Yorkshire it is the same offence because "I was speeding on the M1, and it was the same journey and I sped all the way"?

 

If you had been stopped by a police officer & been caught by a camera for the same site at the same time you may well have an argument ; Otherwise how can it be "the same offence"?.

 

Unless they put up 2 cameras at the same site, each either side of the force boundary ; they'll be at 2 different locations.

You say "less than 20 minutes apart" in the title.

How long apart are the times stated? How far apart are the sites??

Link to post
Share on other sites

By your own admittance you were caught in 2 different Police areas. You committed 2 seperate offences in 2 different areas so as BazzaS has stated, you have committed 2 seperate offences so what guidelines have the Police service breached? The onus and responsibility is on yoy to comply with the limits and for minor offences Police forces and prosecution departments are not going to be phoning each other asking if any of their staff have booked so and so.

 

I once reported the same driver 3 times in the same day for excess speed. Now those 3 offences were amalgamated to convict once, but the driver received a few less points (7 instead of 9) but clobbered on fines, but they were still 3 seperate offences but committed n the same Police area.

 

If you had been caught in the same Police area, then the chances are that your name would have popped up on the database and someone may have put 2 and 2 together. But then it would have exempted you from attending the speed awareness course or a fixed penalty and you would have been looking at a court appearance instead with the risk of a heavier penalty

 

You can complain, but being 2 seperate Police areas, I can virtually guarantee it will do you no good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 different areas - well having been caught once = ignored warning etc then caught again in such a short time = says it all! afraid not much leg to stand on! ??? Magistrates would look at events at the time of happening no doubt (two different cases at that in separate courts - unless you can get heard in one>) just a thought!

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

You would have been very hard pushed indeed to make a case that this is a single continuing offence. Twenty minutes (and presumably 20-ish miles) is a bit of a stretch.

 

However, it doesn’t matter. The first offence has been dealt with by way of the course. The second is now in the court system and cannot revert to either a course (which you couldn’t do anyway because you can only do one in three years) or a fixed penalty.

 

You have two options when the second offence reaches court (which might be a “Single Justice” procedure). You can ask the court to consider your argument that the second offence was a continuation of the first and ask them to find that there are “Special Reasons” not to endorse your licence. The second is that you might (and it’s a very big might) be able to persuade the court to sentence at a level equivalent to the fixed penalty. Magistrates have the discretion to do this and their guidance suggests that it should be done where there are (for example) Administrative reasons, unconnected to the offence, which prevented you accepting a fixed penalty (e.g. if your licence was unavailable and you could not send it in). Your reason is not unconnected to the offence. You declined the FP because you believed it was unjust.

 

I think both these options are extremely unlikely to succeed. Since your main argument seems to rest around a “continuing offence” you should focus on that. What was the speed alleged in the second offence (the one you face court for)? I don’t know what you mean by “each one was within the speed thresholds”. You will be asking the court to accept that you exceeded the speed limit continuously for twenty miles or so and that you did so without reducing your speed to below the limit in that time. This is not something I would care to admit to and I believe it is not something the court will accept as a single continuing offence.

 

I don’t think you will get anywhere challenging the police procedures. There is no right to a course (or indeed to a fixed penalty) and I’m not sure what guidelines you suggest have been broken.

 

I’m away for a day or two so may not be able to respond until towards the end of the week.

Link to post
Share on other sites
well having been caught once = ignored warning etc then caught again in such a short time

 

Was there a 'warning'?. Sure, if a speed camera 'flashed', but if the first was e.g. an average speed camera (rather than, say, a Gatso) there would have been no additional 'warning' from 'having been caught once' during the same journey....

 

I doubt the OP will get the second ticket cancelled.

The OP should also have seen that there were speed camera warnings.

However, I'm not sure it is fair to say "well, having been caught once ....."

Link to post
Share on other sites

You got caught speeding twice. 20 mins/miles apart. Just own up to it because a judge isnt going to blieve your excuse unless you get a very very leniant judge. If found guilty the punishment will be more severe.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let's look at the implication of claiming this to be one continuous speeding incident.

Long distance road works on motorways generally have limits of 50mph.

 

Assuming both Police forces were following the unofficial guideline of limit+10%+2mph, means the speed would have averaged, as a very minimum, 58mph.

 

58 mph for 20 minutes would cover a distance of 19.3 miles.

 

Offering a defense that confesses to have been speeding continuously for more than 19 miles would be hardly likely to sway Magistrates toward giving the benefit of doubt over any procedural irregularity.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Let's look at the implication of claiming this to be one continuous speeding incident.

Long distance road works on motorways generally have limits of 50mph.

 

Assuming both Police forces were following the unofficial guideline of limit+10%+2mph, means the speed would have averaged, as a very minimum, 58mph.

 

58 mph for 20 minutes would cover a distance of 19.3 miles.

 

Offering a defense that confesses to have been speeding continuously for more than 19 miles would be hardly likely to sway Magistrates toward giving the benefit of doubt over any procedural irregularity.

 

We don't know it was 20 minutes, just 2 different force areas, as the OP has said "less than 20 minutes".

 

However, I agree : likely 2 different locations:

 

Unless they put up 2 cameras at the same site, each either side of the force boundary ; they'll be at 2 different locations.

You say "less than 20 minutes apart" in the title.

How long apart are the times stated? How far apart are the sites??

 

The OP hasn't come back to tell us the details, and I agree : it seems likely that if they try to use a "one continuous incident" defence, they'll likely just confirm they were speeding for a while, past 2 different camera sites ........

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, if its in a different enforcement (boundary) area, then if its not subject to any national regs, then its each to its own.

20 mins (even 5 mins) is enough time to slow down.

were they fixed hadecs? one poss technicality cld be re fixed ones recently being required to have been painted yellow.

IMO

:-):rant:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...