Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
    • Doubt the uneconomic write off would be registered, unless you agreed to accept write off settlement of the claim. It is just cosmetic damage. All that has happened, is that the car has been looked at and they realised the repair costs are going to exceed the value of the car. If the car is perfectly driveable with no upcoming normal work required to pass next MOT, your current Insurers will continue Insurance and you can accept an amount from third party Insurers to go towards you repairing the scratched bodywork.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI Complaint with Barclaycard


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi im hoping someone can help,

 

we've had our barclaycard since 2007,

we've always paid it

the average balance is around 2k

 

we only realised in feb we had been paying PPI.

 

I ve sine sent a letter to barclaycard as we've never used this policy as we wasn't aware we even had it even through unemployment etc the payments have been made.

 

They have sent a letter today advising us they are refusing the claim as they sent us 2 letters in jan and feb 2013 requesting we check all of out PPI policies and that all the information was correct and that we should have been in touch within 3 years and the period has now expired.

 

I didn't received any kind of paperwork or I would have cancelled the policy there and then ,

we are both no self employed and my husband has medical conditions which meant the cover is of no good to us.

 

ive called them and he told me to write and appeal the decision.

 

has anyone any ideas or had anything similar?

 

also where can i find a good calculator to give me a true idea of monies paid and what i could potentially claim back?

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are talking rubbish.

 

Right back to them and tell them that you reject their refusal and that you consider that they are simply being obstructive.

 

Tell them that you have received no paperwork from them and that you put them to proof as to having sent it. Tell them that in any event, PPI claims are not time-barred until 2019 and you are proposing to go ahead with your claim in any event.

 

Tell them that they have mis-sold you the policy and that if they are not prepared to reconsider their decision then you want to make a formal complaint and you want this complaint eventually to be considered by the ombudsman.

Tell them that in addition to the obvious grounds that they sold you a PPI policy when you were both self-employed, it now becomes clear that they failed to disclose the commissions that had been paid and as per the case in Plevin which was only decided last year, you are adding that as a further example of their dishonest treatment of you. (Use those words)

 

Make sure that you send all communications by recorded delivery at least. If you deal with them on the telephone at all then make sure that you record your calls.

 

Read our customer services guide and make sure you follow all the advice we give there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have sent a letter today advising us they are refusing the claim as they sent us 2 letters in jan and feb 2013 requesting we check all of out PPI policies and that all the information was correct and that we should have been in touch within 3 years and the period has now expired

seems they are trying to rely on that 3 yr (fos) bar re notification of poss missell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No its the FCA rule

 

If they wrote and can prove it to the correct? Address

Then sadly its game over

I'll upload the ruling later

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

here:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats the one, :)

 

note 2 in link below sums it up

 

https://www.fca.org.uk/news/press-releases/fca-finalise-plans-place-deadline-ppi-complaints

 

'The complaints handling rules already set time limits for consumers to make complaints about financial products.

These time limits are generally six years from the event the consumer is complaining about or, if later, three years from when the consumer knew, or could reasonably have known, they had cause to complain.

 

 

In the case of PPI, because many consumers did not know they had been mis-sold PPI, these time limits may not yet be triggered.

 

 

However, consumers who have previously been informed of this by their firm (for example, through a letter) may be out of time earlier than 29 August 2019.

 

 

ome consumers who have made a claim, or attempted to make a claim, on their PPI may also be out of time earlier, although this will depend on the facts of the case.'

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...