Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Bank the cheque.  No doubt it will bounce - but you never know. When it bounces - that is when you are meant to access their website link and enter your personal details - but of course - DON'T.
    • Wayne Ting, chief executive of e-scooter firm Lime, says there's room for improvement. View the full article
    • If you are absolutely certain* that you were parked OK, write a letter of complaint to the Headteacher and copy in the Chair of the school governors.   If you or the car were identifiable in any way from the photo (eg visible registration number, driver's face etc) I would very politely write that you resent the untrue suggestion that you had parked/had stopped/were waiting in a way that contravened any traffic regulations, and that you are sure that the school will understand that you would like an apology and a correction to be printed in the next newsletter.  (You can also clearly state that you were identifiable from the photo because other parents have mentioned it to you).   See if that works.   You don't want to go to court for defamation as you'll need access to about £10k in fees before you get out of bed.  You just want an apology and a correction.  If what you've told us is accurate, I don't see any reasonable school failing to say sorry.     *My wife is a former school governor and my experience listening to her is that very very few parents actually understand the meaning of the no stopping/no waiting signs and road markings outside schools.  Don't complain unless you are sure you weren't stopped where you shouldn't have been.
    • And they haven't offered a speed awareness course either?  (Have you done one in the last three years or is this in Scotland?)   And is one of the notices for 34 in a 30?  As Man in the Middle says, that ought to be below the level at which they take action.   (And sorry - I don't want to appear preachy - but...  there don't have to be any warnings or signs or lines on the road to advise you of the presence of speed cameras.  If you get away with an exceptional hardship argument you will need to stick to speed limits in future - whether you know there are cameras there or not.  NB Don't know if this applies to you, but most 30 mph limits are restricted roads with a system of streetlighting and don't even need speed limit signs - you are assumed to know this from the Highway Code).
    • It's up to you if you want to pay £300 you don't owe plus whatever Unicorn Food Tax with no basis in law whatsoever that they will have made up in the Letter Before Claim.   We'd prefer you didn't.   But you have received a LBC so it's make your mind up time.   So please    - post up photos of the signage in the dark that you'll have taken two months ago (post 14)    - post up details of planning permission for their signs you'll have found out after you got onto the council, again two months ago (again post 14)    - also let us know if you agree with Brassnecked's excellent letter or if you'd like to tweak bits depending on what you've found out    - upload the LBC.  Some of them are appallingly drafted and invariably contain Unicorn Food Tax which is all useful extra ammo    - also, where are you living now (post 35) and are you comfortable with legal communications arriving at your parents'?   If you look in our PPC Successes thread at the top of the page, you will see 275 times these cheats have been seen off with their tails between their legs (and all had the same "well known legal companies" (ho! ho!) on hand).  In reality 275 times is a massive underestimate, in all 275 cases there was a "moment of victory" IYSWIM where the PPC were thrashed in court or discontinued a claim or were called off by a supermarket chain, etc., etc.  There will have been at least that number again where they were told to Foxtrot Oscar and then crawled back under their stone.  They are eminently beatable but logically when you're in legal dispute you have to put some graft in to beat the other party.
  • Our picks

Constructive liquidation by Barclays


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1339 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Anybody else had something similar??

 

My small building company had a bit of a cash flow problem so we decided to sell some land. We had a site on the market with local estate agents for £750K, 9 years ago. Barclays insisted, and I mean INSISTED, we place it with a company in Leeds.

 

They were reluctantly employed by us as estate agents in June 2007. By July 2008 they hadn't even placed a 'for sale' board outside or advertised the land in any way, despite angry calls from me. 13 months of doing absolutely nothing, and in which time, our debt to Barclays had increased by over £75K.

 

Due to no interest in the land, not surprisingly as it wasn't advertised, Barclays called in the debt and appointed the very same man from the very same company as Receiver.

 

After lots of arguing and highlighting this guys dodgy dealings, the Receiver resigned his position and we were given control, not ownership, but control of our land back.

 

It has cost our family approx £1.3M as a whole, and although I keep complaining, Barclays insist they have done nothing wrong.

 

How do i get the truth??

 

Constructive Liquidation I have called it.

 

Anybody experienced anything similar??

Edited by slick132
para spacing added
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are in a very difficult position – but it sounds like a very believable story.

 

Not a million miles away from the RBS scandal whereby they eventually bankrupted businesses and thence sold the assets.

 

The problem for you is that Barclays would be extremely secretive about it and also the value of the problem stops you from taking any legal action without huge risks.

 

I would certainly start off by sending an SAR and seeing what kind of information you get. They may start bleating on that they don't have data further back than six years that that would be a lie. They use archiving services just like the other banks and they have data going back a long way.

 

Of course an SAR refers only to personal data and so they may try to avoid making incriminating disclosures by simply saying that the data they are giving you relates to you personally and has nothing to do with the business. Still it's worth trying – apart from anything else it would be interesting to find out not only what is in your file but also what is not in the fire. If you work through it carefully you might find references to other stuff which happens to be missing.

 

I suppose that you are unlikely to find anything. I think that I would start canvassing around the Internet to see how many other people have got similar experiences. I'm sure that you wouldn't be the only one. What is the name of the estate agents please?

 

Also, I think I would start making attempts to contact the victims of the RBS scandal. You will find someone here and you may find some of Facebook. Start exchanging notes with them and seeing what ideas they can give you. They've been down the same road as you – no point in duplicating efforts.

 

Presumably you have brought the matter to the attention of the FOS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

First time using something like this so not 100% sure how I go about searching for the RBS people.

 

When I say estate agents, they were supposed to be employed as that, but the company was an LLP one, GVA Grimley in Leeds. The main guy never even opened our file in the first 8 months. Had to walk out of a meeting at my house one day because i was going to hit him. When i got back he had left, and given my Mother £80 because he 'felt sorry I had lost my income'

 

The stress between our family took its toll on my Mother and she died within a year.

 

Like you say, they won't show me any correspondence, and if they do, it will only be what they want us to see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Angry and welcome to CAG

 

1. Do you or your company still own the property ?

 

2. Was it a Ltd Company, or what ?

 

3. Have you any idea why this particular receiver/property agent was appointed ?

 

4. Depending on your answers, it may also be worth sending a SAR to the receiver/property agent.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

slick132. Thanks for your reply.

 

The land in question was owned by my Mother, who as mentioned, passed away not long after this started, and in her will she left it to Myself and my 2 Brothers. we haven't executed this yet as Barclays still hold the deeds and we were unsure of what would happen regarding the debt being transferred into our names should we do it.

 

The company was a Ltd company.

 

I have no idea why GVA were appointed, but to me, it all seemed engineered, as if both parties knew what and what not to do, and for how long.

 

Either Barclays instructed GVA to sit on it, do nothing until a predetermined length of time has passed so Barclays could then call the debt in and appoint the same bloke as Receiver, or the Receiver sat on it and waffled his way through the delays knowing the debt would be called in and he would be appointed Receiver and so increase his potential fees.

 

One of those two scenarios happened but how do I find out?

Edited by slick132
Paragraph spacing added - easier to read
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Angry,

 

I've added para spacing to your posts - it makes them far easier to read and find the details we need.

 

If you clink on the actual SAR auto-link, it'll take you to the SAR thread. It's short for Subject Access Request, a formal means of acquiring details of the data a company holds about you.

 

1. You say you've been complaining to the bank. Was this by phone, in person or in writing ?

 

2. Is the building Ltd Co now in receivership.

 

3. How exactly did the bank have control over the land.

 

4. Did the bank have a charge on the land.

 

5. Was there a formal loan by the bank to the Ltd Co; or an authorised or unauthorised overdraft.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, the Ltd company is now wound up completely. Was over 8 years ago. The bank had a charge over this acre of building land owned by my Mother.

 

All my complaints have been in writing apart from the very first one.

 

Will a SAR be beneficial in ant way or do you think it will bear no fruit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SAR is a very useful tool for getting personal data but will not assist in getting any data for a Ltd Co.

 

However, I wonder what use it may be to you NOW, given the amount of time that's passed.

 

What's the status of the land now - did the bank or receiver take it to set against debt.

 

The chance of you taking this anywhere now depends on the timescale involved. Also, as BF said above, the amounts involved mean that taking court action would be costly and you'd be exposed to huge legal costs that the bank incurs.

 

It may well be that there was collusion at some level between bank staff and staff at the LLP you mentioned.But we (at CAG) have to be very cautious about making, or allowing any site user to make, any specific allegations.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...