Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Natwest/Allied International. Do inhibitions or intimations affect time barring?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2634 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My question that I do not seem to get an answer for is this...

 

Is my debt with Natwest time barred or do the inhibition and intimation affect it?

 

I have worked to pay off/clear all my debts totalling about £20k but there is one I just cannot seem to be rid of.

 

An overdraft of £600 that turned into a debt of £8k due to their charges and interests!

 

Here's a brief timeline.

 

. 2006 Default occurred.

 

. 13.9.2011 an inhibition was granted by the Sheriff's court

 

. At this point we had paid back much more than the original £600 and refused to pay any more.

writing to them got us no where.

From this point on we made token payments,

which despite our income and expenditure they said they refused yet still banked.

 

. 10/1/12 last token payment made

 

. We have not acknowledged the debt since or written to them ourselves since January 2012.

 

. 8/10/12 In an effort to sort out our situation we went to the CAB who put an intimation in place.

We never actually used the plan proposed by CAB as it really didn't help us beyond what we were already doing to remedy our full financial situation.

 

. 9/10/2012 Anderson Strathern send an earnings arrestment to the local authority assuming I was working for them.

They disclosed my debt and personal details in a huge breach of data protection.

 

. 15/10/16 We tried to apply to remortgage our home to clean up the last of our debt but the matter of the inhibition came up.

 

I was told they expire after 2 years, now I am told it is 5.

So it possibly hadn't expired when we applied for the remortgage.

This was the only block to our application.

 

There are dates and interest rates missing from the court paperwork completely, and we have letters that give different figures of what we owe (one month £8k then 3 months later £14!)

the discrepancies are multiple.

 

The debt has been passed to various other collection agencies although I'm not sure it's been sold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Inhibitions do have limitations:

 

They cannot be applied where prior missives have been concluded or where property is being sold under Power of Sale (following repossession by a mortgage).

 

A Sheriff can limit them if a decree has already been granted e.g. transfer of property to someone else. (Where an inhibition is limited it only applies to the property specified in the action, or by the Sheriff.)

 

It is valid for 5 years from the date it is registered in the Register of Inhibitions and Adjudications.

 

It isn’t valid after the outstanding amount is paid in full, the 5 year period expires or on the death of the debtor. However a pursuer can seek to renew the inhibition. The expenses of the inhibition, including those expenses relating to the discharge of the inhibition also require to be paid by the defender.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Inhibitions do have limitations:

 

They cannot be applied where prior missives have been concluded or where property is being sold under Power of Sale (following repossession by a mortgage).

 

A Sheriff can limit them if a decree has already been granted e.g. transfer of property to someone else. (Where an inhibition is limited it only applies to the property specified in the action, or by the Sheriff.)

 

It is valid for 5 years from the date it is registered in the Register of Inhibitions and Adjudications.

 

It isn’t valid after the outstanding amount is paid in full, the 5 year period expires or on the death of the debtor. However a pursuer can seek to renew the inhibition. The expenses of the inhibition, including those expenses relating to the discharge of the inhibition also require to be paid by the defender.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Does that affect time barring?

 

With this particular debt it should be time barred, but are you saying the inhibition can be renewed regardless?

Link to post
Share on other sites

only if they have sought to renew it.

 

can you expand on the bit you say its been passd around various debt collectors?

do you mean DCA's

list the names that have cropped up over time with it.

 

WAS IT natwest that did it or they sold the debt and it was a DCA that got the decree then an inhibition?

 

who were you paying till you stopped?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Natwest got the decree.

 

We were paying Anderson Strathern when we stopped payments. It was our understanding that they were acting solicitors for Natwest. I do not know if Natwest had sold the debt or not.

 

I cannot remember all of the debt collectors and yes I suppose I do mean DCA's but the first was Apex Credit Management, and it's currently Allied International Ltd

Edited by Moobee
answer question in full
Link to post
Share on other sites

both are total bottom feeders

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I well believe that. BT's choose to refuse service and turning the ringer off on our landline has worked wonders, but somehow Allied International got hold of my mobile! (I have had the same number for 10 years and am very careful to only hand out to work and family).

 

I have received a letter confirming the last action on the account as the date I have given

 

I just want to know if I can write the statute barred letter or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

at some point in the past you have phoned someone from the mobile and the number was captured. Companies sell on lists of peoples details and these and up in the hands of these low lifes.

 

In days before computers and mobile technology you trawled the small ads of Private Eye to see who was selling on improperly obtained data.

 

A lot of data leaks out of call centres in India and you can buy the personal details of say 10000 mobile phone customers for 20p each.

 

Once you have invested you money in that illegal activity you sell on copies or refined data to get your money back and some.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Person I'd keep quiet

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...