Jump to content


PPS/Gladstones/BW Windscreen PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform, - Not Parked In Allocated Bay - Premier Inn, Southernhay Exeter


Recommended Posts

just type in 'gladstone Letter of claim

in our custom goggle search box that comes up after hitting our top squares logo

 

plenty of example of the snotty/insulting reply to send

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you,

looking through them they strike me as very similar to the previous text ericsbrother advised i send them so i'm thinking i reuse that response especially as they have taken to addressing me as Ms again 

 

------------------------------------

Dear Sirs,

as the world's second best parking company lawyers you must know that for someone to owe your client money there must be a breach of the unilateral contract's advertised terms and there was not.

 

Your client painting yellow lines all over the place after the event and pretending they were there at the time of the event doesn't create a contract, it is merely misrepresentation.

 

I'm sure that you  advise your client they are wasting their money even if it means no payday for you as you lose them the court claim should they continue with this folly.

 

By the way I have self identified as a man so stop calling me Ms or I shall seek opinion on whether your distressing salutation is gender discrimination that is actionable

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I wouldn't do that just send the letter, filling in "Their" Forms just encourages them into thinking that if they issue a Claimfoirm, someone will wet themselves and pay up, as the forms are designed to trap you and try to mitigate the "offence" which is merely an attempt to ground a breach of an alleged contract.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

is it the same format as before, or is it from Northamption Bulk Clearing Centre?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PPS/Gladstones Windscreen PCN PAPLOC, - Not Parked In Allocated Bay - Premier Inn, Southernhay Exeter

Probably best to reply as it's a Letter Before Claim.

 

------------------------------------

 

Dear Sirs,

 

as I've already told you on XXXXX and on XXXXX, as the world's second best parking company lawyers you must know that for someone to owe your client money there must be a breach of the unilateral contract's advertised terms and there was not.

 

Your client painting yellow lines all over the place after the event and pretending they were there at the time of the event doesn't create a contract, it is merely misrepresentation.

 

I'm sure that you will advise your client they are wasting their money even if it means no payday for you as you lose them the court claim should they continue with this folly.

 

By the way I have self-identified as a man so stop calling me Ms or I shall seek opinion on whether your distressing salutation is gender discrimination that is actionable

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 On bottom line Tell them you are reporting them to police  for  a hate incident for misgendering you, as they continue to refer to you by an incorrect pronoun, thereby causing distress.  say it like that, as if they did try court, their referring to you as Ms might also indicate their POC is rubbish.

 

looking at what Humberside police did to harry Miller, the plod local to B W might just go to tell BW Legal they are in bother.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi.

 

You need a different forum sticky this time, the one for claim forms. If you could give us the information requested in the sticky, we can set about telling what you need to do. :)

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/393251-received-a-court-claim-from-a-private-parking-speculative-invoice-how-to-deal-with-it-hereupdated-aug-2016/

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant : Premier Parking Solutions Limited

 

Claimants Solicitors: BW Legal (it doesnt state solicitor just address for sending documents and payments)

 

Date of issue – 10 Nov 2020

 

Date for AOS - 27th Nov

 

Date to submit Defence - 10th Dec

 

What is the claim for  

 

1.The Claim is for the sum of £126.60 being the contractual charge due from the Defendant in respect of a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) for a contractual breach which occurred on 22/03/2017 in the private car park/land at Southernhay P&D Exeter EX1 1SG in relation to a Skoda Octavia registration mark **66***

 

2.The PCN was issued as the defendant failed to comply with the terms and conditions, as displayed.

 

3.Despite demands, the charge remains unpaid.

 

The claim also includes Statutory Interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum (a daily rate of £0.02) from 22/03/2017 to 09/11/2020 being an amount of £26.60.

 

The claimant also claims £60.00 recovery costs as set out in the Terms and Conditions and in the ATA AoS Code of Practice.

 

 

What is the value of the claim?

£261.60

 

Amount Claimed £186.60

court fees £25

legal rep fees £50

Total Amount £261.60

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PPS/Gladstones Windscreen PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform, - Not Parked In Allocated Bay - Premier Inn, Southernhay Exeter

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked.
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.

 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to PPS/Gladstones/BW Windscreen PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform, - Not Parked In Allocated Bay - Premier Inn, Southernhay Exeter

AOS done

 CPR 31:14 request sent

 

any tips on a defence welcomed

In summary they state where I was parked was not a parking bay, this was not clearly marked and they later painted over the area (i have pictures of the area before and after and the signage attached to this thread in a pdf)

also despite 3 letters stating I'm a Mr not a Ms, they have still filed a claim against Ms

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mention at time bay not clearly marked at the time you have photographic evidence  of site at that time sure theother points are in some of the treads here, but suggestions will probaly be incoming. Not sure where you can use the misgendering, you but it might be worth mentioning it

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be used to illustrate they are clueless with the POC if they cannot even use correct pronouns. Court might think its de minimis though, as in slip of a key, however if proof they have been already informed more than once, and carried on, might make a difference.  Maybe Andyorch could give an opinion.  I would have thought it might be useful for a WS later on as indication the POC was sloppily compiled and wrong from the start.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you wont in the initial brief defence specifically mention anything directly regarding being outside of any lines.

and just remember that lines on private land are purely tarmac graffiti and have zero legal standing.

 

plenty of our 3 - 5 line defences here

use our search top right 

pcn claimform.

 

defence is not due till 4pm 11th. not 10th dec

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm struggling with the few lines needed for defence, lots of threads but cant see many that are similar circumstances to mine

the signs at the time displayed a BPA logo but they were not members, can i use that?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you will later

for now use the generic 3 -5 line one.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

all i seem to find when searching is lots of people asking what defence to use, i lifted the following from another website

  • The signage at the car park was inadequate and therefore no contract was entered into.
  • The amount claimed is a penalty and unenforceable
  • The land was not relevant land under POFA
  • The keeper is not the driver and the parking company has not complied with POFA.

The POC only states "contractual breach" now rather than not in allocated bay like earlier correspondence did, i assume i need to wait for their response before filing this defence anyway.

excuse my ignorance, i am trying to understand and learn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...