Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
    • good you are getting there. Lloyds/TSb...i certainly would not be risking possible off-setting going on if a choice were there, but in all honestly thats obv too late now..., however..you might not never be in that situation so dont worry too much. regardless to being defaulted or not, if any debt that is not paid/used in 6yrs it becomes statute barred. you need to understand a couple of things like 'default' and 'default notice' a default is simply a recorded D in the calendar section/history of a debt, it does not really mean anything. might slightly hit your rating. the important thing here is a default notice , these are issued by the original creditor (OC) under the consumer credit act, it gives you 14 days to settle whatever they are asking, if you don't then they have the option to register a defaulted date on your credit file. that can make getting other credit more difficult. and hits your rating. once that happens, not matter what you do after that, paying it or not or not paid off or not, the whole account vanishes from your credit file on the DN's 6th b'day. though that might not necessarily mean the debt is not still owed - thats down to the SB date above. an OC very rarely does court and only the OWNER of a debt can instigate any court action (Attempted a CCJ) DCA's debt collection agencies - DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS they have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's TYPE. an OC make pass a debt to a dca as their client to try and spoof people into paying through legal ignorance of the above statement. an OC may SELL on an old debt to a DCA/debt buyer (approx 10p=£1) and then claim their losses through tax write off and their business insurance, wiping their hands of the debt. the DCA then becomes the debt OWNER. since the late 70's dca's pull all kinds of 'stunts' through threat-o-grams to spoof a debtor into paying them the full value of the debt, when they bought if for a discounted sum (typically 10p=£1). you never pay a dca a penny! if read carefully, NONE of their letters nor those of any other 'trading names' they spoof themselves under making it seem it's going up some kind of legitimate legal 'chain' say WILL anything....just carefully worded letters with all kinds of threats of what could/might/poss happen with other such words as instruct forward pass... well my dog does not sit when instructed too...so... DCA's SOMETIMES will issue a court claim, but in all honesty its simply a speculative claim hoping mugs wet themselves and cough up...oh im going to court... BIG DEAL DCA - show me the enforceable paperwork signed by me...9/10 they dont have it and if your defence is conducted properly, most run away from you . however before they do all that they now have to send a letter of claim, cause the courts got fed up with them issuing +750'000PA speculative claims and jamming up the legal system. so bottom line is two conclusions.... if you cant pay a debt, get a DN issued ASAP (stop paying it!) make sure it gets registered on your file then it stops hurting your file/future credit in 6yrs regardless to what happens (bar of course a later DCA CCJ - fat chance mind!)  once you've a registered DN , then look into restarting payments if the debt is still owed by the OC, if SOLD to a DCA, don't pay - see if they issue a letter of claim (then comeback here!).        
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
    • Any update here?  I ask as we have someone new being hassled for parking at this site.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PPS/Gladstones/BW Windscreen PCN PAPLOC Now Claimform, - Not Parked In Allocated Bay - Premier Inn, Southernhay Exeter


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1015 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No harm in sending it (just describe yourself as "the keeper" or "the hirer" and refer to "the driver" without identifying them).

 

If Premiere Inn get the ticket cancelled : great. If not : no harm done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
it seems they have now painted yellow lines where i was parked

 

Yep that won't work either, they can't retrospectively paint lines to enforce their silly invoice.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tarmac graffiti means nowt on private land

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that menas they are IPC only and their signage is therefore unlawful under POFA. should they wish to take things further this can be used against them.

If the parking co's read the threads here they would learn a lot about their shortfalls, drop the stupid claims and address the problems of their own creation but that loses them possible income so they plough on with their follies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i want to avoid going to court if i can (although i will gladly go to court if needed to avoid paying these criminals) based on this information, am i able to nip this in the bud by contacting them directly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

it will never work so dont even contemplate it.

 

you should read up more on the parking cowboys,

they will never admit they are wrong because they are almost never right and how do you think they stay in business?

 

Let them chase you and if they get the IPC's ( proprietors, Will and John)

famous lawyers, Gladstones, (proprietors Will and John)

to write to you then you respond in a forthright manner

but anything else is a waste of time from now on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i see that BW legal have credit checked me a few days ago so i am fully expecting to hear from them shortly. 

 

i still have all of the relevant pictures and documents in this thread, will update as soon as i hear anything.

 

edit.......

my partner has just sent me a pic of a letter from BW legal, not opened it yet because its actually addressed to Ms not Mr, should i return to sender unopened?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I would respond to BWL and tell them

 

Dear Sirs,

as the world's second best parking company lawyers you must know that for someone to owe your client money there must be a breach of the unilateral contract's advertised terms and there was not.

 

Your client painting yellow lines all over the place after the event and pretending they were there at the time of the event doesnt create a contract, it is merely misrepresentation.

 

I'm sure that you  advise your client they are wasting their money even if it means no payday for you as you lose them the court claim should they continue with this folly.

 

By the way I have self identified as a man so stop calling me Ms or I shall seek opinion on whether your distressing salutation is gender dicrimination that is actionable

Link to post
Share on other sites

no 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you use their ref number but you dont identify yourself as the driver, navigator, agent or anything like that.

they have written to you as KEEPER so just use the text suggested and dont add anything or take anything away.

 

Your job is not to be nice or pass your english GCSE but to tell them where to get off

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

response from BW legal 

bw_legal_dec_2019.pdf

 

as far as i can tell they aren't shown as members of the IPC or BPA (i checked the BPA membership around the time of the first letters arriving)

 

Frankly I think the use of the wrong title is irrelevant. Maybe someone else will come along and say different

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why they are the parking world's second best (or worst) solicitors, they conveniently forget to tell you that no liabilty whatsoever is created unless the company puts their proper business address on the signage and NTK.

 

A PO Box No is an immediate fail as is attempting to use a false instrument to make a pecuniary advantage as these muppets appear to be doing by using the wrong image of the terms offered. they also mention VAT in their charge when it isnt applicable if the charge is actually valid and not a penalty.

 

Also there is no trade body called the Independent Parking Committee and Will and John at the IPC will huff and puff at anyone who claims membeship of such an organisation.

 

That also menas that PPS cant legally access your keeper details.

The name changed in 2016 so PPS should have changed their signs. 

 

It is my opinion that you havent been offered a contract and no liabilty has been cheated by anyone, let alone the keeper.

Problem is that some judges ignore the small print and say " well, there was a sign so it must be right" when it isnt so.

 

Same goes with Planning consent but get enough small things and it creates it own momentum and tips the scales in your favour.

Something for the future, no point telling them this yet, let them waste their clients money writing to you again.

 

Now use of salutatio

n- if you have identified as female when born male you can make a lot of mileage out of this otherwise it is just another example of their slapdash work and stupidity

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you, i will do nothing at this point.

with regards to the wrong title, i didnt actually type that line in my post (think admin joined 2 posts together and somehow included that quote)

they just assumed i was a Ms because of my name, i havent changed gender

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

how many more 'we are going to jump' letters are they going to send out before they actually do jump off?

you've not even got to the letter of claim stage yet....

 

dx

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

one of the snotty/insulting letter sent to gladstones will do

plenty here already.

 

post it up 1st mind

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...