Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Shelley and hope you're ok 🙋‍♂️   Is the respondant an individual, a business, a Ltd Co, etc ? This info may help others advise on how best to enforce the Tribunal award.   Interest  -  it's the award amount of 2,500 times 8% divided by 365 which gives you the daily interest amount, times the number of days.   Or 2,500 x 0.08/365 = interest per day = 55p per day   Or use the factor of 0.00022 to give the same result for the daily rate of interest to add. 2,500 x 0.00022 = 55p per day.
    • receipt converted to PDF and added to last post      
    • Well I really don't know where to begin with this. I've spent hours trying to figure out what to put but it seems that every witness statement is different depending on the exact circumstances. I know that I shouldn't put all my cards on the table but I don't know which ones to hold back and which ones to get rid of altogether.   This is what I have so far...   I, XXX of XXX am the Defendant in this case. I make this statement in support of my defence again the Claimant, Civil Enforcement Ltd.   1.       CEL make it impossible for defendants to discuss PCNs with them or their representatives:              A.       On the 26th Nov 2018 I received an unexpected PCN from CEL. I immediately went onto their “Contact Us” page, which stated that operators are available to speak to during normal working hours (see appendix 1 - THIS IS JUST A COPY OF THEIR CONTACT US PAGE). I tried calling numerous times to discuss the matter but regardless of what time of day I called there was no option to speak to an operator, only an automated system to pay.              B.       When I received a debt collection notice from ZZPS (see appendix 2 - COPY OF LETTER) the letter instructed me to call them on 01932918916.                      14th Mar 2019 - I tried calling several times and have a call recording I can play for the court to show that it was impossible to speak to anyone. Instead I was played the following automated message: “The party’s call minder belonging to 01473478289 is full and can’t accept any more messages. Please try again later. Goodbye.” The call then hangs up.                     19th Mar 2019 - I tried again at several times throughout the day and this time a message played thanking me for calling ZZPS and asked me to hold. It then rang for 2 minutes before repeating the same message. This happened over and over again. I have two recording that I can play for the court showing this to be true, one that lasted 9 minutes and the other for 10 minutes before each time giving up.            It appears that there is some unreliable call routing in place meaning that I had no way of contacting CEL or ZZPS as they both advise.   2.       CEL failed to produce any of the documentation I requested in writing, which obstructed me from making a decision on how to proceed with this case:             A.       On the 3rd Dec 2018 I completed CEL’s online Appeals Form (see appendix 3 for a saved copy of the submitted form - ATTACHED TO THIS POST). CEL responded (see appendix 4) but failed to answer any question, stating that GDPR prevented them from doing so.             B.       On the 14th Aug 2019 I sent them a CPR 31.14 Request letter (see appendix 5). CEL did not respond.   3.       According to Schedule 3, Part 1, Class 13 of The Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2007, only signage older than 10 years is deemed as having consent granted.   CEL has changed its signage 3 times within the last 10 years, which can be clearly seen from Google Street mapping images:            A.       2018 – Present: Signage stating 1hr free parking (appendix 6a)            B.       2012 – 2017: Signage stating 3hr free parking (appendix 6b)            C.       2008 – 2012: Signage stating 2hr free parking (appendix 6c)   CEL’s current signage was installed at some point during 2018 but according to Stockport Council’s online planning applications search system no planning permission was granted. I believe the signage has therefore been erected illegally, which makes it impossible to enter into a contract with them.   4.       CEL has also added legal costs to their claim, which is not recoverable within the Small Claims Court.   I believe that the following facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.   Have I made a complete balls-up of this or am I going in the right direction? I thought it might work in my favour if I try to show the judge that I made every reasonable effort to resolve this without going to court but CEL purposely make appeals as difficult as possible. Perhaps none of that matters. Not sure. 🤔 Appeal Text.pdf
    • This will be ok for you to offer the final 1 month's fee you should have paid :-   Dear Harlands,   I refer to my membership at [town/city] gym.   The DD mandate was cancelled after the June 2019 payment was made and this was notice of my intent to cancel the gym membership.   I now realise I should have left the DD Mandate open to pay a final month's fee for the notice period.   Please confirm your bank payment details and a reference so I can pay you the £xx.xx to end this matter. I will not pay any admin fees added by Harlands. I will only deal with this matter in writing, not by phone.   My offer is valid for 14 days only and will be withdrawn if you demand any higher amount.   Yours sincerely,
    • seems like your payment issue is not just your error      
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 990 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Today someone from Marston Holdings came to our property for someone who no longer lives in the UK.

 

 

He was a family friend of ours and used our address without our permission nor knowledge.

They are after a Magistrate Court fine.

 

My mother answered the door.

Mother doesn’t speak English so she woke up my brother up who was unaware what was going on and shut the door on the person telling him that he doesn’t leave here.

 

A removal notice was left behind saying that they are now going to take our stuff from us.

 

I called the number from the removal notice and spoke to the person who authorised the entire thing and after explaining to them what happened and he said he can’t doing nothing but prepare for our stuff to be taken. His giving us 72 hours from Monday to prepare...

 

He was rude and unfriendly and wasn't trying to reason to with me.

 

He said that because my brother shut the door on him and didn’t provide ID’s, he nows has ‘enough evidence’ that the person does live here.

 

Now we are going to lose all of our stuff because

a) someone used our address without our permission and knowledge and

b) my brother shut the door on the bailiffs telling him that he wasn't living in the property.

 

We don’t have receipts for most of the items.

 

What can I do?

We do not know where this guy lives and we do not have any contact details...

 

We are a family of 6 and this will cause a lot of stress.

This is the first time we are dealing with bailiffs.

Edited by MrIndeed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Because it is a criminal fine matter, best to supply Marstons with ID information of all residents. You can see a Solicitors to swear a declaration that all property at x address belongs to x list of people and there are no goods belinging to Mr x who has never resided at the address.

 

If Marstons don't behave, ask for which Magistrates dealt with the matter and make a complaint to the enforcement manager.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried doing that over the phone, but the guy wasn't having any it.

.. He kept saying that he 'understood' but he still can't prevent it even though his the one who authorised it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is because in most cases people tell lies and the person owing the fine is found when they attend. They can force entry for criminal fines. If the person does not live there, then have ID information available for all residents and invite Marstons to attend with Police officers present, when you can explain to Police that the person Marstons are seeking does not live there. You are not expected to pay money for this person and Marstons can only take goods they believe this person owns.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay... I can understand that, but what's stressing me what is how the guy said that even though he doesn't live in the address, we must somehow contact him and get him to pay before the 72 hours or else his going to take our stuff.

 

and on the day there is no guarantee that they might still take our stuff even after we proved him wrong.

Edited by MrIndeed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A Statutory Declaration sworn at a Solicitors pdq as per UncleBulgaria post #2 might help as in Named debtor non resident and all goods belong to the named persons below. The bailiff would be silly to completely ignore a SD, might buy you time to submit the SD to the issuing court. Don't know if any solicitors are open Saturday, but first thing Monday could be ok, or even ask the court to swear one Monday, as you are horrified by the whole thing and the named debtor is not there and never has been. Indicate to the court that your mother who opened thue door to the bailiff does not speak English.

 

Other Caggers will be along soon to help further or offer alternatives.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is where I have a problem with the EA's

totally understand they are fobbed off a lot of the time

 

but there should be more protection for those whom are genuine.

they should not have the hassle of doing a section 85 (think that is right )

 

we are meant to be innocent until proven other wise.

 

EA's seem to be judge and jury .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Had similar situations to OP a while back now though, first was a bailiff fetching up at my door two months after we moved in for a previous occupants TV Licensing fine, stroppy git he was was most upset when proof of start of occupancy and ID shown, plus a CAB advisor ID card he didn't try to push in as Mrs BN was holding on to the Dobermann behind me at the door.

 

Yes it is difficult for EA's where there is dispute of residency, but they should also exercise due diligence and ask for reasonable proof before saying they will smash their way in to a person with limited or no English language knowledge, very common within migrant and Asian communities, as it will be the wives and mothers at home usually when the bailiff calls; well illustrated in the infamous Can't Pay episode when the EA abused the Romanian lady.

 

Other one was a couple of months later two coppers turned up with an arrest warrant without bail for the previous occupant for non payment of fines for driving whilst disqualified. Was studying law at that time, so showed them proof they looked upset, but told them that had they arrested me without allowing me to show ID, I could have had them for wrongful arrest and unlawful detention, something confirmed by one of my lecturers later.

 

Just shows the dangers of officials, bailiff and police making assumptions and threats as a result.

 

Hope MrIndeed can get the requisite proof, or at least the Stat Dec before Marstons come back and start shouting and drilling locks.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can easily show proof that the person has never lived in the property.

 

If they still won't go away, I just get the police to get them away.

 

What I'm afraid is when the bailiffs turn up when my mother is alone or when's there's no one home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

send scanned copies of that proof by email to marstons and the court, using the reference provided by the bailiff. If you can't scan the documents take pictures and send the Jpegs as attachments.

 

As this is a criminal fine there is a chance that the police will side with the bailiff and help them gain entry if you call them,

although you could show the copper and bailiff the proof that the debtor has never lived there,

 

 

whether the bailiff will accept it is another matter,

all they want is the money,

and they don't care who pays it,

debtor or third party.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They will often try to persuade a parent to pay a fine incurred by an adult child resident or not.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that's never going to happen.

If that's how the system works then it is unfair and unacceptable.

 

My plan is on that day the guys show up, I will show them all the ID's of those who live in the property and anything they require to prove that the person never lived in the property.

 

The interaction will happen though the kitchen window and not by the door.

At no point will the door be opened.

 

I will also swear a Statutory Declaration on the behalf of my mother at my local Magistrate Court on Monday.

 

If Marston still want to take our stuff even after proving them wrong,

we will simply refuse

 

 

How much does it cost to swear a Statutory Declaration?

I'm getting different prices which is making me confused.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Magistrates court let you swear one might be no cost, don't know whether the court will let you swear one as you aren't the named debtor

Price of Stat dec around £10 at a solicitor /Commissioner for Oaths get 3 notarised copies, one to send to marstons, one for Magistrates, and one to keep to show the bailiff. Other Caggers might well be along soon with further, and possibly better advice. Hope all goes well, as it isn't a nice experience to put innocent third parties through.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

I found the whole situation to be ridiculous and stressful.

 

Hopefully everything will be dealt when they come around again by peacefully and not forceful.

 

Under no circumstances will my mother be made to pay for someone else fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm afraid that's never going to happen.

If that's how the system works then it is unfair and unacceptable.

 

My plan is on that day the guys show up, I will show them all the ID's of those who live in the property and anything they require to prove that the person never lived in the property.

 

The interaction will happen though the kitchen window and not by the door. At no point will the door be opened.

 

I will also swear a Statutory Declaration on the behalf of my mother at my local Magistrate Court on Monday.

 

If Marston still want to take our stuff even after proving them wrong, we will simply refuse

 

How much does it cost to swear a Statutory Declaration?

I'm getting different prices which is making me confused.

 

My two pence worth.

 

I would have as much documentation like council tax and tenancy agreements to hand as well as id's.

 

Feel free to tell the EA to go away.

 

All you will do is get his back up and arouse his suspicions if you are being evasive/abusive.

 

At this point,

I wouldn't be surprised if he starts the process of gaining entry to search the property if he believes the debtor to reside their and your actions can give him that belief.

 

Ultimately,

its not the EA putting you through this stressful position,

its the debtor that has not paid the debt.

 

The EA will continue until he is satisfied.

 

Showing paperwork of who lives at the address proves just that...who lives there.

But it doesn't prove the debtor doesn't live there.

Only a search will sometimes confirm this.

 

And a stat Dec will be ignored by the EA.

You need to get the court to accept it and withdraw the EA.

 

Thank you.

 

I found the whole situation to be ridiculous and stressful.

 

Hopefully everything will be dealt when they come around again by peacefully and not forceful.

 

Under no circumstances will my mother be made to pay for someone else fine.

 

Yes,

I wouldn't expect someone's mother to pay even if the debtor did live there.

 

 

But any doubt as to who owns the goods could result in a removal which can only then be stopped by payment or a third party claim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There will be no doubts as my mum does own most of the stuff... I do not have to proof to them by giving a receipt. That means nothing nor is a good evidence for proof.

 

Who keeps receipts for items that aren't warranted after a 1 year or even 6 months?

 

We have nothing to do with this court order or the payment.

We will not be the third party who will pay for some guys fines who used our address without our permission.

 

Plus I be doing a Statutory Declaration on the behalf of my mother on Monday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is, if he doesn't believe you, you WILL have to provide proof of ownership.

A stat Dec nay work with court and can be used as a 3rd party claim but ultimately, the court will make that decision after removal.

 

If you are compliant with the EA however, then the chances are he will be gone within minutes.

 

You have no idea how many times EVERYDAY we are lied to. We need to confirm its a gone away, not just tell the court we have been told. We have to see the proof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, you already answered this. I didn't see your posts until now...

 

 

I will be showing the guy the passports of all of those who live in the property, any bills such as utilities, contract details from the children schools showing who lives in the property i.e. my mother and father details and any council related stuff letters such as tax, housing and child benefits.

 

 

Will this be enough evidence that the person does not live in the property.

Edited by MrIndeed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

Thanks to members of this forum, I am now comfortable.

 

Sorry if I did sound arrogant, it’s just I’m stressed and frustrated with the whole situation.

 

It is also the first time we are dealing with bailiffs and I had negative connotations about them after reading and watching videos of bad bailiffs being bullies.

I do understand that these guys are just doing their jobs.

 

We should have dealt with them more appropriately when they first came around to our house.

My mother didn’t speak English who in turn woke up my brother who was confused and probably p**sed off.

 

This whole situation could have been avoided if we instead listened and not slam the door shut on the bailiffs.

 

Hopefully the next time the bailiffs come around we will be able to resolve this issue by being cooperative. We having nothing to hide.

 

Thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just by being open and honest and having the paperwork should sort this matter out.

The chance of him forcing entry after having a civil chat and seeing the paperwork is slim to none.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hello,

 

Thanks to members of this forum, I am now comfortable.

 

Sorry if I did sound arrogant, it’s just I’m stressed and frustrated with the whole situation.

 

It is also the first time we are dealing with bailiffs and I had negative connotations about them after reading and watching videos of bad bailiffs being bullies.

I do understand that these guys are just doing their jobs.

 

We should have dealt with them more appropriately when they first came around to our house.

My mother didn’t speak English who in turn woke up my brother who was confused and probably p**sed off.

 

This whole situation could have been avoided if we instead listened and not slam the door shut on the bailiffs.

 

Hopefully the next time the bailiffs come around we will be able to resolve this issue by being cooperative. We having nothing to hide.

 

Thank you.

 

If the enforcement officers do not behave themselves, then record their visit on any video recording device that you have and call the Police. Hopefully this should not be necessary, but you do hear of so many reports where innocent third parties are harassed into making payments.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I tried doing that over the phone, but the guy wasn't having any it.

.. He kept saying that he 'understood' but he still can't prevent it even though his the one who authorised it.

 

This is a response that I gave a few days ago to another poster with a similar problem:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?475182-Marstons-court-fine&p=5002587&viewfull=1#post5002587

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the advice you have given, then there must be a way of innocent members of the public contacting the court that issued the warrant to advise them of the conduct of their Enforcement Agents.

 

I do not personally think it is reasonable for Enforcement companies to have any right to enter a third parties property to start searching for someone owing a fine. There should be a cooling off period, where the third party can provide relevant evidence to support that the person named on the warrant does not reside at the address. This might be a sworn statement to Magistrates together with relevant documents, where there are consequences for not telling the truth.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree in principle UB, as we advised Stat Dec, and show proof, and Grumpy giving the EA side showed that they might not accept the proofs offered, and possibly if English isn't first language or have limited knowledge EA will continue, as they might in the "heat of the moment" regard the alleged debtor/third party as lying or obstructive. so drill the lock of the closed door, and ignore the paperwork proffered as Grumpy points out it, only proved who lives there not who does not so will enter to search for the non resident debtor's goods.

 

When I had the call for the ex occupants council tax arrears admittedly a long time ago my proof of ID and occupation date plus a Dobermann and vicious cat along with CAB ID badge dissuaded the bailiff from ignoring my proof as he wanted to do and enter anyway, as he said I might be showing fake ID.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...