Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

France Defaulted Mortgage paid off by Insurance Company, that Company now claiming the full amount back from me!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2604 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I was living in France and had a French Mortgage for 200,000 Euros in 2009.

 

 

Unfortunately I lost my job and I had to return to the UK,

I paid what I could to the Bank over the next few years,

but one day in 2012 the Bank informed me that the outstanding Mortgage was paid off by an insurance policy.

 

 

I rented the house out to tenants after making enquiries and paying a Notaire to see if the house was actually mine, I was assured it was and assumed that I had taken a policy out at the time of purchase.

 

Last year I agreed to sell the house to my tenant,

it was then discovered that the insurance company Credit Logement had put a charge on the house in 2012 for the outstanding amount of the mortgage they paid off plus interest.

 

I have been living in the UAE since 2010, and my tenant in my house in France since 2011.

 

 

Neither of us had received any notification of any actions or judgements against me.

I was totally unaware of any legal proceedings whatsoever as the papers were served to an address in the UK, I hadn't lived in since 2010.

 

We are in a stalemate situation at the moment with the Insurance Company threatening to re-possess the house since May 2016 but have they have not made any moves to do so.

 

The Paris High Court served a Judgement against me in March 2012 with the insurance Company putting a charge on the Property's Title in August 2012.

 

Does anyone know if these outstanding debts have a Statute of Limitations?

 

Any advice would be gratefully appreciated.

 

Badhorsey

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's because they cant, if the UK CCJ/CO was done whilst you were not resident in the UK , at the house in the UK as you were abroad, then it could have been set aside

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for taking the time to reply. I didn't make it clear the mortgage is on a house in France.

 

The Bank that gave me the Mortgage is French, as are the Insurance company claiming the monies, and the Court Order was issued in Paris.

Edited by Badhorsey
Link to post
Share on other sites

Think there might be a misunderstanding here.

 

After you could not pay the mortgage, the French Bank used their contingency insurance and the insurance company effectively took over as the creditor with a charge against the property. Banks take out contingency Insurance on mortgages to cover their liability, for when mortage holders can't pay their mortgages for whatever reason. In France it seems the Insurance company then take over as the creditors.

 

What is happening with the current tenants ? Are they paying you the rent money ? Or is the rent money being paid to the Bank or Insurance company ?

 

I think you need to contact the Insurance company and advise them you have been a resident of the UAE since 2010. They can't take any action against you in the UAE, but you need to find out what is happening. If the Insurance company are not being paid, then at some point the tenant will be served notice to leave the property and the Insurance company will take possession of it, with a view to selling it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The current tenants want to buy the property, however once we discovered last year that there was a charge on the property then we agreed not to accept any further payments from them.

 

We contacted the insurance company and stated that the we were happy for them to take the sum offered from the tenant to buy the property as long as we were no longer liable for any outstanding monies on the property including mortgage deficit or interest. They did not reply to us, but our tenant informed us that his legal team had been advised that Credit Logement would not agree to this.

 

So the property is still occupied by the tenant rent free, and CL still threatening re-posession and have been for past 12 months. If the property is re-posessed and auctioned is that end of our debt or similarly if the tenant buys it, even if there is a deficit? Are there any Statute of Limitations?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does not work in the way you think it does.

 

You should never have agreed for the tenant to live in the property for free.

Unless you have a legal tenancy agreement which they could show to court appointed official if required, the tenant could be forced out of the property by bailiffs without much notice.

 

 

If there is a tenancy agreement that is current, the tenants could be served notice to leave the property and then the Insurance company will sell it. At that point, when the property is put on the market, the tenants can bid for it. It might be put up for sale at public auction.

 

The only way there would be no debt, is if the sale price obtained by the Insurance company, is at least the mortgage remaining plus interest AND all costs incurred in repossession/sale, it is not possible to say what costs would be added, but it would be all their legal fees, court fees, auction fees etc. Any debt remaining would be subject to French limitation laws, which you can google for. There is a website stating limitations period for most countries.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think about, what is the point in hurrying.

The Insurance company own an asset which is attracting interest and they will try to come after you for any debt.

 

Also perhaps they have had the property valued and believe that it is worth not proceeding with repossession until prices have increased.

 

There is a tenant in the property that is keeping an eye on it and they don't need to pay a property maintenance company to regularly check on it.

 

There might also be the issue that they have not been able to contact you in order to serve any legal paperwork.

 

In the UK, it can take several years, before a Bank starts to go through repossession. So in France in seems to be the same.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If i were living in the UAE,

i think i would write to the Insurance company stating the position.

 

 

That they can sell the property at the earliest opportunity,

providing they give relevant legal notice to all parties concerned including the current tenants.

 

 

Advise them, that the tenant is interested in bidding for the property once it is placed for sale,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have already done this,

but with the proviso that once the sale is complete,

we have no further obligations to them.

 

 

Our tenant has already put forward a good offer to them,

considerably more than it will fetch at auction,

they are happy to accept this but they have informed the tenant they will not agree to writing off any mortgage deficit , fees interest etc as part of the deal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they won't agree to writing off fees and left over mortage. This debt is an asset to them, which they can trade on if necessary.

 

Better to let them proceed with possession and sale, without trying to get them to accept conditions. It is going to happen at some point and might leave a bigger debt, the longer it takes. Deends on whether property prices are increasing and the property is being maintained in good order.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...