Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Im afraid that it sounds like im going to have to try and do the best myself. Im not sure if investigators have more powers or not to find out things i cant.    Yes your right i dont want to be accused of harassment too as that's the kind of thing she would do.   I will take a read through the link you provided and see what i think. If i knew this was going to happen i would have try and prepared myself with the right information in advance but now i dont have much to go on.   Many thanks for your help  
    • Hi all i have now received a letter back from my bank regarding my charge back being reject3ed    It states the following.   "The bank for the retailer has rejected your claim and we are unable to assist you further  under Visa regulations. I am sorry we could not be of more assistance at this time. If you wish to persue this matter you will need to seek independent advice. We will not debit £15894.00 from you account."      What is my next recourse of action and how do I proceed
    • No second card, just that the card number on the original paperwork that is signed they sent through is different from the one they claim in their settlement offer letter.  Not sure that constitutes different card or one that got replaced or a new account as the card changed card type. 
    • Ok many thanks for your reply. I can count her lawyer out.    The service stations are a handful in a certain area which must be not far from Deeside so not too many can be 24 hr and accommodate trucks etc so im thinking 8 places max. Long shot i know but i dont have much chance using other means.   Are investigators expensive?     All i have is a few old texts from her agreeing to pay me back one day once her divorce is final and references to her waiting for updates from her lawyer, her divorce has been dragged out for 4 years and covid has made it worse. I trusted i would get it back one day.   Yes thats right it has not been settled but the dates keep getting moved and moved and her lack or reassurance to me made me more and more concerned. Now she has blocked me and is completely ignoring me.    
    • 1st .....its not a parking fine.   its a speculative invoice some scamming parking company issued because the driver of a car, you are the registered keeper of, entered into some imaginary contract, that might not even be enforceable, paid for, or even exist, on a bit of private land the landowner employed the private parking company to manage.   go back and ring northants bulk. enquire why the CCJ now shows as discharged. and ask for a copy of the judgement CCJ, the discharge proof, and the original claimform by email pdf.   whilst there get them to readout the address the claim was served too and the exact text of the particulars of claim,, RECORD YOU CALL.        
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Chrisy Morris; YouTube Bailiff 'Baiter' to face 2 day trial for obstructing an enforcement agent.


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1032 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

The following press report features on SCOOP.

 

Anyone viewing YouTube videos regarding bailiff enforcement, will be familiar with the name of Chrisy Morris (he previously used to call himself Chrissy Morris).

 

Chris Morris features very prominently on many of the FMoTL F/B groups where he is very know know for 'baiting' bailiffs. He will telephone enforcement agents, enforcement companies, court staff etc and upload the conversations onto YouTube.

 

As the article states, he is to face a 2 days trial for obstructing a Enforcement Agent when enforcing a High Court writ.

 

 

https://tamesidereporter.com/2017/03/patel-cottage-bailiff-eviction-demonstrator-opts-for-trial/

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As it is Frday, i thought this would amuse. Strange world we live in. Almost comedic !

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The article linked by BA shows that he will rely on FOTL for defence so maybe he should attend court dressed as Robin Hood for full effect.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether he is right or wrong, it will be for the court to decide.

 

But reading the article it comes across as if the Judge has already made his mind up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does, and the Judge indicated that he would have fun with the FMOTL mantras.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Whether he is right or wrong, it will be for the court to decide.

 

But reading the article it comes across as if the Judge has already made his mind up.

 

This is Chrisy Morris discussing the background to his complaint.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The arrest occurred at the eviction of a property that belonged to a teacher by the name of Rekha Patel. She has also been subject to recent court action which is very serious indeed.

 

It will be a long read, but if anyone is interested in the background (for discussion purposes), her full story is here:

 

http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=11145

 

PS: Quatloos is a forum that exposes the silly Sovereign Citizen and Freeman on the Land fools and their antics.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am praying right now to the sky on my knees with a smile on my face that he gets a harsh punishment for being out of touch with general reality...

Do we know where this circus is going to be held?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presume it is Derby crown court ?

 

I find these situations difficult to read about, because they are stupid. Lady damages neighbours property and refuses to pay. Followed by court claim, charge against her property and possession being granted to sell it, so the debt gets paid. FMOTL mob try to prevent HCEO's taking possession following court order and Police take action. Fair summary ?

 

Of course prosecution authorities will try to stop this mob behaviours and unless a jury are convinced that no offences were committed, then they will be given a suspended sentence i suspect, with an order not to take part in any such disorderly obstructive conduct,.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chrisy Morris seems to not understand the difference between a High Court Enforcement Officer and an Enforcement Agent.

 

The correct position is this:

 

A High Court writ will be personally addressed to one of just 23 active authorised High Court Enforcement Officers (in this particular case; Alan Smith). He has personal responsibility for that writ and any action that may flow from it.

 

Most importantly, a High Court Enforcement officer, (in this case, Alan Smith) may delegate
his enforcement power
to an enforcement agent.

 

This delegated authority has existed for hundreds of years and in the present case, is pursuant to the Courts Act 2003

 

In the past few months, Morris has put himself forward as a BNP candidate. Simple Google searches will show his application form.......with his address (which is evidence that he has a fixed abode).

 

https://www.facebook.com/BNP-Candidate-Chrisy-Morris-371163519921481/

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not think that this is the same Chrissy Morris (BNP)

I do not know him but live not far from him, so am aware of him

He was involved in a local election not long ago as an Independent candidate. not BNP

Link to post
Share on other sites

I stand corrected it is the same, but he did stand as an Independent at the last local election to get on too Maldon BC

I have just seen a picture on the FB page.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I do not think that this is the same Chrissy Morris (BNP). I do not know him but live not far from him, so am aware of him

He was involved in a local election not long ago as an Independent candidate. not BNP

 

Its the same Chrisy Morris. He came 2nd in the election.

 

If you scroll down in the following link a few pages you will see Chrisy pictured in middle on the bottom row.

 

http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=10715&start=240#p237475

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

UPDATE:

 

Chrisy Morris was found guilty of obstructing a High Court Enforcement Agent at his trial last week. Unfortunately, he decided to walk out of the court, so he was not present when the verdict was announced.

 

The press release provides more detail.

 

https://tamesidereporter.com/2017/05/justice-denied-claims-campaigner-found-guilty-of-obstruction/

 

 

Anyone visiting YouTube, will know that 'Bailiff Baiter' Chrisy enjoys videoing himself talking to bailiffs. Whether a video has yet appeared on YouTube regarding the hearing, I don't know. Until it does, viewers will have to put up with this video instead:

 

https://www.facebook.com/100016973624991/videos/109983266244127/

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can actually understand why people are trying to stand up for Miss Patel, if that newspaper article is correct. How did a court decide that she was liable for neighbours legal costs of £60k, when she had already paid neighbour their £8k claim ? Seems a disproportionate amount.

 

And Miss Patel is resident again in the house and now a tenant having sold it for £2. If legally she was entitled to sell it, then the claimants costs of £60k may never get paid.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
I can actually understand why people are trying to stand up for Miss Patel, if that newspaper article is correct. How did a court decide that she was liable for neighbours legal costs of £60k, when she had already paid neighbour their £8k claim ? Seems a disproportionate amount.

 

And Miss Patel is resident again in the house and now a tenant having sold it for £2. If legally she was entitled to sell it, then the claimants costs of £60k may never get paid.

 

I did start a thread a while ago regarding Rekha Patel and the eviction. I should have updated the thread a long while ago but it was locked,a lot has happened since her eviction !!!

Edited by Andyorch
Link to locked thread removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

"I do not think I am going to enjoy the court experience Sir”

 

“You Will” said the Judge

 

 

Oh this made my week!

 

:lol:

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
I stand corrected it is the same, but he did stand as an Independent at the last local election to get on too Maldon BC

I have just seen a picture on the FB page.

 

He used to be Chrissy (with one S) and then changed to simple Chrisy. Despite this, he is the same person:

 

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=i4IxBwAAQBAJ&pg=PT145&lpg=PT145&dq=Naughty+Bastards+-+Twenty+One+True+Stories+chrissy+morris&source=bl&ots=2x2URI_klA&sig=FEi7Ler9opnU3qKSOa8nRH34LgM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj7yI6G8O_TAhVqJsAKHdzADHIQ6AEIIjAA#v=onepage&q=Naughty%20Bastards%20-%20Twenty%20One%20True%20Stories%20chrissy%20morris&f=false

Link to post
Share on other sites
UPDATE:

 

Anyone visiting YouTube, will know that 'Bailiff Baiter' Chrisy enjoys videoing himself talking to bailiffs. Whether a video has yet appeared on YouTube regarding the hearing, I don't know. Until it does, viewers will have to put up with this video instead:

 

https://www.facebook.com/100016973624991/videos/109983266244127/

 

I love his claim that he is dyslexic. Perhaps that could explain why he thought that the warrant that he saw was a fake....when it wasn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you watch the video he did not to read it properly,

Then again you have said they do not need to show the warrant.

 

Mr Morris was fined and ordered to do community service, I think 150 hrs

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Chrisy Morris will be on TV June 15th channel 5 I think?

 

Apparently to show the other side of Can't Pay we will take it away.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...