Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Equita Bailiff threatening to drill my locks - Dart Charge


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2617 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I had a dartford crossing penalty charge that I never paid as was in & out of my property due to domestic violence issues.

 

Equita now have the debt.

 

On the 7/2/2017 they gave me an enforcement notice after only having my debt since 27/1/2017,

 

the notice stated I had until 17:30pm on the 7/2/2017 to talk to them before a bailiff was sent to my house.

 

I was not at my property to recieve this letter to meet their deadline so it went unnoticed.

 

I called equita as soon as I returned home to explain my situation & they just said it's in the hands of their enforcement officer now so deal with him.

What a monster this man is!!

 

He has told me I am to pay him £50 a week or the full debt,

I'm on ESA & currently awaiting a decision on my pip award,

I told him I don't even have £50 a month but could do £20 a month at a push.

He refused & said he will return to my property with the police to take my goods this was on the 18/2/2017

 

On the 20/2/2017 he came to my property but I was not home.

 

He then sent me this text:

 

Due to your failure to pay a Bailiff, under the instructions of Her Majesty's Court and Tribunal Service has attended your premises with the intention of taking control of goods and removing your goods.

 

The Magistrates Distress Warrant empowers the high court enforcement agent , by virtue of Schedule 4A of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004, to enter your premises by force should you wilfully refuse to pay the outstanding fine and costs.

 

To prevent the removal of your goods and the expensive additional removal costs you must make immediate payment. Failure to do so will result in the re-attendance of your premises with Locksmiths and the Police to remove your goods even in your absence.

 

NO FURTHER NOTICE WILL BE ISSUED.

 

Is he just being a bully or can he really get a locksmith to drill out my locks while I'm out over a dart charge penalty?

 

I thought it was only council tax, HM revenue tax debt or criminal fines they could do this.

 

I have a debt relief order coming into place in about 10weeks which this debt is included in but until this locks in I'm stuck with it.

 

What am I supposed to do about this bully?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On the 20/2/2017 he came to my property but I was not home. He then sent me this text:

 

 

Due to your failure to pay a Bailiff, under the instructions of Her Majesty's Court and Tribunal Service has attended your premises with the intention of taking control of goods and removing your goods.

 

The Magistrates Distress Warrant empowers the high court enforcement agent , by virtue of Schedule 4A of the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004, to enter your premises by force should you wilfully refuse to pay the outstanding fine and costs.

 

To prevent the removal of your goods and the expensive additional removal costs you must make immediate payment. Failure to do so will result in the re-attendance of your premises with Locksmiths and the Police to remove your goods even in your absence.

 

NO FURTHER NOTICE WILL BE ISSUED.

 

Is he just being a bully or can he really get a locksmith to drill out my locks while I'm out over a dart charge penalty?

 

I will respond in more detail when your thread is moved into the proper area. In the meantime, please be assured that the bailiff cannot use a locksmith to gain entry. Schedule 4A of the DVCVA 2004 applies to Magistrate Court FINES.......and NOT to Dart Charging !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

I had assumed that but he seems to be using every scare tactic he can think of.

 

He was extremely aggressive with the way he spoke to me on the phone too,

stating that he will bring the police with him if he has to & they will give him access to my home.

 

I wouldn't mind but I have nothing for him to take as I was burgled in July 2016 so the only thing I have left is a 10yr old LG tv that the sound flicks on & off on.

 

I'm pretty much bankrupt hence the application of the debt relief order but he didn't seem to be listening to me one bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

I had a dartford crossing penalty charge that I never paid as was in & out of my property due to domestic violence issues.

 

I was not at my property to recieve this letter to meet their deadline so it went unnoticed. I called equita as soon as I returned home to explain my situation & they just said it's in the hands of their enforcement officer now so deal with him. What a monster this man is!!

 

Were you living elsewhere when the notices were sent to you?

 

Do you still have a vehicle?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was staying at friends due to domestic violence issues,

 

I still own the car but it's with the metropolitan police safeguarding team as it was involved in an incident with my ex partner. They have had it since May 2016 & refuse to return it.

 

It's my own fault for not dealing with the dart charges straight away but obviously being a single disabled parent facing the above issues it was the last thing on my mind at the time.

 

While waiting for a reply I searched the DVLA records for details on my car & it is showing that no details are held on this car anymore.

 

 

Could that mean that it has been crushed now?

 

It was in a state from being crashed but I thought the police would have to notify me of the destruction of my car not that I've enquiried about it in at least 3/4 months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was staying at friends due to domestic violence issues,

 

 

I still own the car but it's with the metropolitan police safeguarding team as it was involved in an incident with my ex partner. They have had it since May 2016 & refuse to return it.

 

It's my own fault for not dealing with the dart charges straight away but obviously being a single disabled parent facing the above issues it was the last thing on my mind at the time.

 

I think that the best solution for you would be to submit an Out of Time witness statement with the Traffic Enforcement Centre. All bailiff enforcement will then be placed on hold for approx 6 weeks. You will need ther penalty charge notice number (which for Dart Charging will start with IA and be followed by 8 numbers) for the forms.

 

I would not suggest that you speak with the bailiff at this present time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your help.

I now have all the relevant paperwork in hand & am happy for pay the charge just not the bailiff.

 

Shall I just ignore him & his threats of a locksmith then?

Follow the advice given by BA, the out of time will keep the bailiff awway, and if accepted there may be a chance to pay only the original Dart Charge. This bailiff would not be allowed to drill the locks anyway as it is a civil penalty.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your help.

I now have all the relevant paperwork in hand & am happy for pay the charge just not the bailiff.

 

Shall I just ignore him & his threats of a locksmith then?

 

If you pay the Dart Charge to Highways England, then your payment should be forwarded to the bailiff company so that they can deduct their Compliance fee of £75. The balance of the payment would be split on what is called a 'pro rata' basis with approx 60% being allocated towards the unpaid Dart Charge and 40% towards the remaining bailiff fee.

 

PS: My above comments are almost identical to a very recent Local Government Ombudsman decision which I intend posting up in the 'discussion' section of the forum later today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you pay the Dart Charge to Highways England, then your payment should be forwarded to the bailiff company so that they can deduct their Compliance fee of £75. The balance of the payment would be split on what is called a 'pro rata' basis with approx 60% being allocated towards the unpaid Dart Charge and 40% towards the remaining bailiff fee.

 

PS: My above comments are almost identical to a very recent Local Government Ombudsman decision which I intend posting up in the 'discussion' section of the forum later today.

 

Is that the original penalty charge of £115.50 as I've tried to pay that but it says I have to go through equita as my debt has been passed on. Equita won't deal with it as they have given it to this bailiff.

I feel like I'm going round in circles :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have printed off & filled out said form & will post tomorrow morning recorded delivery.

 

Thank you again for all your advice

 

Please......NEVER post an Out of Time witness statement. They need to be submitted to the Traffic Enforcement Centre by email. That way, as long as the application is received at TEC by 4pm, it will be PROCESSED today. That does not mean that bailiff enforcement will be placed on hold today......usually the enforcement company will receive instruction to cease enforcement by the following morning.

 

On your form, have you explained that you had to move out of your property due to domestic violence? It's important that you do mention this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

print it

sign it

scan it to an attachment

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...