Jump to content


Deed signed pursuant to statute, although statute repealed 3 weeks before


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1580 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

This is my first post and hope I am posting in the correct section.

 

I would like to ask if anybody has experience or knowledge of the validity of a deed of easement signed and sealed, pursuant to S.68 of the CROW Act 2000 (a statutory easement).

 

 

The compensation sum was paid before S.68 was repealed.

 

 

I was working abroad at the time and was only able to sign the deed 5 months later.

 

 

I did not know that S.68 had been repealed on 1.10.2006, although I am sure that the other party (local authority) would have known.

 

The deed contains a restrictive covenant which wouldn't apply if I had simply applied for a prescriptive easement following the repeal of S.68.

 

I am hoping that the deed is void/redundant, and any help would be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...