Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Who is the retailer?   What was the item? Where was it sent from and where was it sent to? How did you pay?
    • I purchased an item costing approximately £3000 from an online retailer. The item was sent via Royal Mail Special Delivery. The item never arrived. Tracking shows as delivered with a signiture and printed name which is not mine. I informed the retailer and they in turn informed Royal Mail who started an investigation. After the investaigation Royal Mail said the item was delivered to a house number opposite me and that I should check with them. I checked and nothing had been received by that neighbour. After this the reailer initiated a claim with Royal Mail. It has been 5 days since then and I have not heard back from the retailer. My question is: Legally, do I really need to wait for the Royal Mail claim? As far as I see it I have a contract with the retialer. I have paid them money and they have agreed to provide me with goods. I have paid my money but not recieved the goods. The Royal Mail aspect is nothing to do with me and not my problem. Am I correct in this thinking?   If so, what should I do?
    • Hello to all on this wonderful forum! I have just joined and hope to be able to share my experiances and knowledge with you all whilst also benefitting from others.
    • The top ranking highlights China's growing influence on the word economic stage. View the full article
    • read it properly, doesn't say will anywhere. i don't think we've ever see any of these threats go anywhere.    
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Old MBNA Credit Card debt > Aktiv Kapita > PRA > Brodies LLP


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1442 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Here's my summarised situation.

I'd like any advice on how I should proceed now.

 

Took out a Credit Card with MBNA in 1999

 

Through their unscrupulous lending,

my own stupidity & intermittent mental health issues,

I ran up a debt that I couldn't pay off

 

I started to have problems meeting my minimum monthly payments in 2010, and requested a temporary interest freeze when it got really bad

(thought this was 2011, but now realise it was probably 2012... further explanation below)

to help me to sort our my finances.

This request was ignored.

 

After several months I stopped paying anything and prioritised other debts.

 

Eventually defaulted in 2012

I started to get harrassed by Aktiv Kapital

Over time have now been chased by PRA, another couple of agents and back to PRA

 

At one stage,

not sure when but probably 2012/13

I requested proof of the debt being owed to Aktiv Kapital/PRA?,

and didn't receive that proof.

 

At the time I downloaded a template letter to send,

but not sure where from,

but it included the sentence about not admitting to the debt.

 

Due to not receiving the proof requested I didn't enter into any communication with any of these companies again.

PRA continued to harrass me.

 

I wouldn't hear from them for months and would then be bombarded with telephone calls as well as letters.

I didn't answer the phone to them or respond to their letters.

 

Over time they have offered a discount on the debt several times

 

In June 2016 they advised by letter that they were considering passing the case to their Scottish Solicitors

 

I received a letter from Brodies LLP in July 2016 stating they had been instructed by PRA to pursue recovery of the debt and threatening court proceedings.

 

I panicked!

I was convinced at the time that it had actually been in 2011 that I had last communicated with the original lender and sent a Statute Barred letter.

 

I heard nothing back and when a couple of months passed with no communication I thought I had heard the last from them.

 

On Saturday I received a letter from Brodies again (6 months later) which included a copy of my original Credit Agreement and copies of the final few months of statements of my account with MBNA showing I made a payment in August 2012.

 

This letter states that

"To avoid this matter being passed to our Court Action Team, you are required to pay the Debt or contact us to discuss a suitable payment arrangement not later than 2 February 2017"

The amount of the debt being chased is £5781.16

 

Are they allowed to only give 4 working days for me to contact them?

 

Are they allowed to come back to me after 6 months of no communication?

 

Am I entitled to request proof of ownership of the debt by PRA?

 

Should I contact them tomorrow?

I am not in a position to pay this amount.

 

Part of me says,

I borrowed the money and should accept that it eventually needs to be paid.

 

However, if there are any loopholes I can use to my advantage then I'd like to try to use them, as for the first time in 20 years I have all my other debts under control and can't believe this has come back to haunt me.

 

I've tried to read as much as possible on other threads, but got really confused by some of the terminology being used, so apologies if I should have been able to find my answers elsewhere.

Edited by missjam
Link to post
Share on other sites

.....throw the morality card that you had the money so must repay it out the window now.

 

/...if you did owe anything now..., then why did a big mutli national creditor sell the debt on to a debt buyer and write it off and not take you to court and crush you themselves...???.......urm.........

 

all the players you mention are all part of the same 'group'

so sadly you fell for the oldest trick in the book that DCA's pull...

 

you fell for the perceived web that the debt was somehow 'going up a chain'

that was a notion that they painted

you fell for it and responded...mug caught in the headlights...doh!!

 

back to basics....

 

its a 1999 mbna card

they'll almost never get an enforceable agreement nor the right sets of T&C's together

other than raiding their filing cabinet and faking it, from MBNA should you CCA request them...[no WAIT]

that WAS what you got or signed

other than an application form which doesn't contain all the prescribed conditions correctly.

 

so bearing that baseline in mind...

 

did you take this out whilst resident in Scotland

and are you at the SAME address as your take out date?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thankyou

can you please scan up what they have sent as an agreement & T&C's to ONE multipage PDF

follow the upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's got to be the very 1st time we've actually seen the reverse of their postal application form ever..

the T&C's make refs to conditions in the bottom right like see 14.1 etc

they are not on that page

did they send page 3?

 

 

I also notice PPI ticked

i'd expect PPI running from 1999 to wipe any debt out even £5k they are claiming you owe

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

PPI was my first thought too

 

 

having looked at the statements I have I wasn't paying it.

 

 

I found one very old statement from 2002

(I think! will check when I get home this evening) that also didn't have a PPI payment on it,

I assume I cancelled it.

 

 

The job I was in when I applied for this card didn't last long and I became a student a month later so I possibly cancelled it.

There is no page 3 of the application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then they are missing an important part of the CCA return then.

 

 

and where the statement of account, did they send one...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it should have come wit the CCa return as its part of the requirements

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So at this stage I've now not met their deadline to get in touch. I'm wondering if I ought to be sending something about the CCA being incomplete? Or do I sit tight and wait for their next move?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you certainly don't invite letter tennis no.

its also not relevant to tell them the CCA return might not be compliant

that's not for you or them to speculate upon

 

that for a Sherriff to do, IF it ever gets that far.

 

the overriding fact here

[but its not unusual mind]

 

is that MBNA sold a very large debt on.

why?

they could have crushed you in court but didn't....urm..

 

but as I said, that's quite typical of MBNA

and seems to be the remit of the American consortium that at the time had purchased MNBA credit card division.

 

its now I think back in the uk and owned by Lloyds I think.....I read.

 

the bottom line is:

 

PRA are only interested in fleecing money out of people

like all DCA's

 

so have seen +£5k here and have put it thru their PC threat-o-gram machine.

 

if any human has actually had a part in this yet is to be discovered..i doubt it.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have failed to give you an annual statement of account

( should have done this every year since the debt was sold to AK, along with a notice of assignment), j

ust an old card statement from before AK bought the debt so not CCA compliant.

 

 

Debt looks like it will become SB in sep/oct so do nothing for the moment and they will probably let the clock run down too long to actualy take action by the time they do try again and you tell them they have got it wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

lots of ifs but mays might's and instructed there

IMHO ignore too

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...