Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Answers to Stu's questions: 1) I live in a communal building and so therefore I originally assumed that it was a communal dish for the entire building, although I have not heard anyone else complain about this. I am probably the only person who lives here that actually has Sky and so the only person who uses the dish in question. There is another dish on the same side of the building which is a bit below that one towards the corner of the building, but I know which dish serves my flat as it was directlyt above where the scaffolding originally was. When I saw the blue screen on my front room TV I immediately telephoned my local Housing Association, although since then it has mostly been email contact in the past six weeks. 2) I don't personally own the dish myself as it was already there when I moved in here back in 2014 - as a matter of fact, I didn't even know which dish served my flat when it came to receiving satellite TV channels on my Digibox. I believe by implication that Sky must have installed it instead. At my old place which was a council house before I moved here, I had a Sky dish installed which was my own (a bloke came one Sunday morning back in 2005 to do the honours) , although I left it behind when I moved so that the next people could use satellite TV,  and also due to the fact that there would already be a satellite dish at the back of the building at my new place as well as a satellite socket on the wall at the back of the TV and so therefore I didn't need to take my old one with me. My Digibox and my account came with me when I moved to my present address. I would also like to say that the workman who was working on putting the satellite dish right will be returning on tomorrow - Wednesday 26th June 2024 to finally correct the dish via a cherry picker and so for the first time in six weeks, I will have proper TV again in my front room! I will post again once more on this thread to let you know that it has officially been done. Meanwhile, I have everything crossed for tomorrow that the satellite TV will be back on again, because he had been let down twice already. Wednesday is Day 44 of this charade, and hopefully the final day of it as well.             
    • Thank you for all of your consideration and time on my case The revised letter is fine and approved at this stage. As far as I kno neither the toilet or basin were replaced, the holw referred to by the calimant was an access point to a stop tap that couldnt be moved due to the location at below floor level in the garage A few minutes ago i gothome to a posted hard copy of the claim the original respond date was 4pm 9thJuly  In the same post delivery I recieved a further letter showing an additional 14 days for response to 4pm 23rd July I altered my copy of the claim form posted  earlier so that we were all ware of the revised date Spoke to my electrician earlier and she is considerring whether to put it in writing in a statement of truth She doesnt like confrontation and may not.  Follows from email 20th may   The door frames, where it’s all not fitting correctly with gaps and warped timber used.  A relatively simple fix  £25 . Skirting boards on the curved parts where it’s been filled with a filla and not even been smoothed out.  as above £25 . The architrave isn’t joining correctly with one piece with a cutting taken out of it. ive not seen this so cant comment but a simple fix . Sliding door, no stopper was used to stop it going all the way back and isn’t aligned to the floor. a door stopper was fitted The door slides fully into the pocket to maximise a very tight access witha 2ft 3" door . The extractor going into the boiler where a round tubes been used to an oblong pipe. It’s also held on by gaffer tape.   not a good standard and an easy fix £25 . The window hasn’t been packed correctly and one opening window isn’t aligned. an easy fix it took 1 minutes on my return from holiday . One piece of flooring isn’t sitting flush so will damage very quickly. I hadnt seen this,  the flooring supplied by the c,aimant was apoor quality Bnq with click systme that didnt lock weel so a boad may have risen up again an easy fix to replace one board £25 The toilet is far too close to the radiator and you can’t get up if sitting down. The defendant showed the claimant the size of the room right at the beginning and had discussions about it being a tight space I supplied a short reach pan to maximise space. Difficult to change probable cost £2-300 or more dependong on the final position . The stop tap I cannot get my hand in to be able switch the tap off.  I cut  a hole in the bottom of the basin vanity unit I wsnt particulalry pretty but I have large hands and could turn off the stop top it was below floor level as mentioned earlier  £25 to make hole even bigger . The window you are aware of that’s cracked and you are replacing.  this was carried out by the defendant, appointment on 10th June on return from holiday    The claimants email of 10th june shows an extended list of items that his builder carried out in claimants absense while I was on holiday and without my consent  Quality of skirting board that was fitted around the curved wall inside the bathroom and also in the lounge.  see above . Toilet fitted too close to the radiator where you could potentially burn your leg Claimant shown this at outset I cant  comment too much as I have no measurments see above . Hardly no space for you to get off the toilet when sat down, especially if you are tall.  This was pointed out prior to fitting the floor . The hot and cold feed were incorrectly placed to the wrong connection on the sink  Easy 5 minute flexible pipe swap over £10 . The vanity unit isn’t suitable due to the position of the stop tap. Small hole cut in the vanity unit base to try and switch the tap off  see above . No caulk used around the door frames  easy fix £15 . The extractor fan, where you used a plastic round tube, going to a square tube that was held on by gaffer tape. The square tube then went into a round hole on the outside, this was then filled with foam gap.  Easy fix £25 . The pocket door felt like it wasn’t fixed well, the door at the bottom wasn’t sliding on to the runner very well and you had to help it onto the run. Also no lock on the door.  a relatively easy fix £25 . The boiler door frame had to be replaced due to the timber that was used. The door also was replaced due to the door being fitted to fix into the twisted door frame wood. The door had been shaved so it would fit into door frame that was twisted.  I wasnt aware of this prior to my holiday The architrave used inside the boiler room was short, had a piece taken out of it. The architrave in the toilet wasn’t fitted well.this is subjective . You used two single sockets for the bathroom and boiler room. Where I only needed to have I double switch. I fitted a 2 gang light light switch . The door frame going into the garage you left gaps between the wood and the wall.  maybe required a little filler of quadrant bead£10 . Door handle not fixed correctly and is stiff  easy fix £5 . The window, one opening window doesn’t look level, the other you can’t open it and leave it slightly open in a lock position  fixed by me on my return . Skirting by the radiator, the hole had been cut too big and had just been filled with filler.  ?? £10 to make good? . One plank of flooring wasn’t fitted flush and my toe caught it sitting upwards. poor quality flooring supplied by claimant an easy fix £25   All pricing is subjective as I didnt have the chance to  look at the complaints   Except for moving toilet and replacing pcoket door all snags are relatively minor items That could have been easliy remedied Interestingly he doesnt mention taking out the pocket door wall, lifting up the floor to move the toilet replacing drains and making new wall      
    • That's great news and thank you for letting us know. I'll amend your thread title. HB
    • Ironically, 2 weeks after no updates the parcel has been located and delivered today!! maybe the Evri system is not as bad as it used to be (for me, at least...). Annoying that I spent 3 hours yesterday brushing up on my consumer legislation, but at least I'm well equipped to handle any more issues going forwards! Apologies to have used up the forum's bandwidth and feel free to mark as "resolved".
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Booked with Love Holidays - Accom changed on arrival


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2695 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning all,

 

 

Been a member some time - not usually one to post for the hell of it but I have been really racking my brains over this one and hitting brick walls wherever I go...

 

 

Long story short - had booked a holiday for myself over Xmas and when I arrived they told me the hotel was overbooked. They then put me in a cab and sent me from my nice *chosen* serene resort, and dumped me in a completely different resort, right in the heart of the shops / nightclubs etc

 

 

The accommodation was a lower grade, fewer facilities and I wouldn't have chosen it in a million years. I called Love Holidays there and then as I just wanted to come home. I took loads of pictures and on their advice, decided to try and make the best of a bad situation and raised a complaint when I got back.

 

 

They forwarded this to Hotel Beds (who my contract is with, apparently) who agreed I'd been let down, totally unacceptable etc and offered "compensation" of 25% of the accommodation which clearly wasn't going to cut it. I'd paid over £500 total and they were offering me £64 back.

 

 

After a bit of follow-up this was raised to 40% and £103 compensation. How can anyone in this day and age pay for one product and receive something totally different?

 

 

Anyway - ABTA didn't want to know because Hotel Beds are based in Spain and are obviously not ABTA affiliated (that's handy isn't it?) which begs the question - why are Love Holidays if nothing you ever book with them is never their responsibility? If you ask me, it's more of a selling point "look at us, we're ABTA affiliated!" - indeed, but that endorsement is about as much use as a condom machine in the Vatican. I digress...

 

 

So I send my complaint (along with photographs, screenshots etc) directly to Hotel Beds - and despite their pledges on their website to "guarantee" to answer emails within 24 hours and resolve complaints within 7 working days - I've not heard a peep out of them.

 

 

Unfortunately booked with debit card and although the bank are part of the Visa voluntary chargeback scheme, their hands are tied because Hotel Beds are "willing to provide assistance" in offering me a laughable amount of compensation for ruining my Christmas with lack of sleep, stress, and putting me in 1960s style accommodation when I paid for so much more.

 

 

I'm not sure what to do now. I'd offer to drive over to their HQ and bend over - but they're based in Spain (I think) which would involve me booking and paying for more travel... :-D

 

 

Any wise words would be greatly appreciated! Thanks for reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On what basis does this company Love Holidays say that you don't have a contract with them? You booked with them? You paid them? It sounds like a try on to me but I'm willing to learn if you can tell me how it works.

 

As far as I can see it is simply a question of upping the offer. I would expect that at some point the issue of County court papers will do the trick. I can't imagine the Love holidays really want to check over to wherever you live and risk defeat in the County Court on a small amount. Who is it who has offered the settlement so far?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally, when was it disclosed to you that Hotel Beds were apparently your contracting partner? Have you looked at any of your documents?

Link to post
Share on other sites

On what basis does this company Love Holidays say that you don't have a contract with them? You booked with them? You paid them? It sounds like a try on to me but I'm willing to learn if you can tell me how it works.

 

As far as I can see it is simply a question of upping the offer. I would expect that at some point the issue of County court papers will do the trick. I can't imagine the Love holidays really want to check over to wherever you live and risk defeat in the County Court on a small amount. Who is it who has offered the settlement so far?

 

 

They state "clearly" in their T&C's your contract is with a separate airline, accommodation provider and airport transfer - even thought they take the payment in whole from you when you book - and you don't even find out who that is until you have booked:

 

 

Incidentally, when was it disclosed to you that Hotel Beds were apparently your contracting partner? Have you looked at any of your documents?

 

The other thing is, while I was searching (in order of Trip Advisor rating, naturally) there was a banner stating holidays to this destination are currently trending upwards, notices about the price being only available for so long etc - in other words, pressure to buy immediately and not necessarily time to sit down and look over the T&Cs as carefully as one might.

 

 

I raised the issue with ABTA who promptly came back with "You contract is with Hotel Beds who are not ABTA affiliated and regretfully we cannot support your case on this occasion..."

 

 

The problem is my hotel "overbooked" and Hotel Beds were not aware of this. It seems to be that the hotels in these resorts are all scratching each other's backs. When I turned up at Reception, the guy took my passport, started filling in the paperwork etc - it was only when he asked me if my family were joining me and I told him I was travelling alone, he disappeared out back and came back 5 minutes later and told me they were overbooked. Suspect to say the least. How comes he didn't know this beforehand?

 

 

But I guess it comes down to what you can prove eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that an agent is liable to a third party on behalf of the principal if the identity of the principal is not disclosed. You say that you did not know that the principal involved was Hotel Beds until after the contract was made. In that case on my understanding of the law of Agency, Love Holidays are liable and you should proceed against them on that basis.

 

I think you have to come up with a reasonable and moderate figure to go for.

 

I think you need to list out exactly the way in which you feel that you were deprived of the benefits which you contracted. It's up to you if you would like to say that the entire week was wasted – but you will have to justify that if it eventually goes to court – as I expect it would.

 

Frankly, for the cost of the claim form – although there is a hearing fee of over £200 – but for these costs I would say it was worth a punt if you feel that you are up for proving a point. If you come up with a reasonable figure, then they may will simply cough up rather than avoid the scandal.

 

Of course it would be very funny, wouldn't it, if it was Love Hotels which had done the overbooking – but this would be really too difficult to find out. You still haven't told us who it is who has offered you the settlement so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just checked by doing an example holiday booking to make sure I wasn't going mad or citing anything inaccurate...

 

 

Yes - you don't find out who your accommodation contract is with until you've paid at least the deposit.

 

 

And if you're thinking to yourself "wait one, I just want to read a little more about these T&Cs... there's a couple of prompts on the page to imply you won't really have the time...

Booking example.jpg

Edited by JesterRIP
Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that an agent is liable to a third party on behalf of the principal if the identity of the principal is not disclosed. You say that you did not know that the principal involved was Hotel Beds until after the contract was made. In that case on my understanding of the law of Agency, Love Holidays are liable and you should proceed against them on that basis.

 

I think you have to come up with a reasonable and moderate figure to go for.

 

I think you need to list out exactly the way in which you feel that you were deprived of the benefits which you contracted. It's up to you if you would like to say that the entire week was wasted – but you will have to justify that if it eventually goes to court – as I expect it would.

 

Frankly, for the cost of the claim form – although there is a hearing fee of over £200 – but for these costs I would say it was worth a punt if you feel that you are up for proving a point. If you come up with a reasonable figure, then they may will simply cough up rather than avoid the scandal.

 

Of course it would be very funny, wouldn't it, if it was Love Hotels which had done the overbooking – but this would be really too difficult to find out. You still haven't told us who it is who has offered you the settlement so far.

 

 

 

Thank you for the advice - and I have indicated in the course of my follow up complaints that court action would be a given should my complaint not be resolved to my satisfaction so I've been very transparent from the "off". Unlike them...

 

 

Love Holidays forwarded my complaint to the principle accommodation supplier, Hotel Beds - who are based in Spain to make things tricky when it comes to being bound by UK law.

 

 

Hotel Beds came back with "Yes that is unacceptable - here's a 25% accommodation refund sweetner..."

 

 

When I told Love Holidays this was unacceptable (i.e. if I bought a brand new Jaguar and they tried to fob me off with a 40 year old Fiesta) they immediately upped that to 40% without even going back to Hotel Beds.

 

 

I queried this and Love Holidays' response was that "Hotel Beds told us we could raise it to this amount".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although I suggested that you should keep your claim a modest, it seems to me that Love Holidays have made such a serious error in the way they are presenting themselves as an agent that they would be extremely worried about finding themselves in court and having a judgement given against them on this basis.

 

Because of this, I think that you might find it worth raising your claim – or at least expressing it on the high side – counting on the fact that they would be unwilling to take the risk of losing in court.

 

All of this of course, is assuming that I'm correct on the agency principle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest an assertive letter to them pointing out that you reject their position that as agent they have no liability towards you. I would explain to them that not only you have been dealing with them on their website and you have paid your money to them, but if there assertion that they are merely acting as an agent is correct, then in order to benefit from the protection of being an agency position, they were required to identify their principal before the contract was made. They did not do this and therefore they are directly liable and you are intending to sue them on that basis within 14 days unless they compensate you for the loss and distress you have suffered which you calculate at £XXX pounds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally, Love Holidays will have a contract with Hotel Beds which will very likely contain an indemnity clause. So in the end, it's no skin off their nose unless they feel shy of enforcing it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Love holidays receive loads of complaints, seen many on CAG with similar issues.

 

They are not really Travel Agents. The are really just like a comparison site. You either book a holiday with different component parts, with separate flights and accommodation, which come with terms not guaranteeing much or you book a packaged ATOL bonded holiday which is just referred to Thomas Cook or whoever. With an ATOL packaged holiday it comes with more rights.

 

I think Love Holidays really only take responsibility for the packaged arrangements. The other holidays with accommodation not guaranteed is a contact with the booking company. Love Holidays just handle the money and no doubt take a commission.

 

This is one of those internet trading situations where legislation has not kept up. It might take someone to go to court to make the argument.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for taking it to court and determined not to get mugged off but it's really difficult to know who to take action against. Love Holidays who claim no responsibility but wouldn't even tell me who my flight was with and my accommodation booked through until I'd paid... or Hotel Beds who are responsible for my accommodation, yet are based in Spain and not bound by UK law ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest an assertive letter to them pointing out that you reject their position that as agent they have no liability towards you. I would explain to them that not only you have been dealing with them on their website and you have paid your money to them, but if there assertion that they are merely acting as an agent is correct, then in order to benefit from the protection of being an agency position, they were required to identify their principal before the contract was made. They did not do this and therefore they are directly liable and you are intending to sue them on that basis within 14 days unless they compensate you for the loss and distress you have suffered which you calculate at £XXX pounds.

 

 

Whilst they didn't identify the principle - they did say "it won't be us" or words to that effect.

 

 

I'm going to give them a chance to get in touch with Hotel Beds on my behalf, and if this fails then I'm going to be approaching solicitors.

 

 

I know they read these forums, so none of this will come as a surprise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for taking it to court and determined not to get mugged off but it's really difficult to know who to take action against. Love Holidays who claim no responsibility but wouldn't even tell me who my flight was with and my accommodation booked through until I'd paid... or Hotel Beds who are responsible for my accommodation, yet are based in Spain and not bound by UK law ?

 

I think you can issue a UK court claim against a Spanish company trading In the UK via Love Holidays. Because it is within the EU, the contract was made in the UK and you are resident in the UK, then a UK court can have jurisdiction. Your problem is the costs involved, as you might well have to pay someone in Spain to serve the court claim on this Spanish company at their Spanish address. There is also the problem of enforcement of any judgement in your favour.

 

As i think Bankfodder suggests you might be able to make a claim against Love Holidays, but before you do that, i would suggest you really read all of the information you were given by Love Holidays before you booked and paid. Also the contact information issued after you booked. From what i have read previously Love Holidays have a pretty watertight business model that ensurers they comply with all legal requirements and it is very difficult to make them liable in situations like these. There will be contract clauses about the accommodation not being guaranteed and which company is arranging it.

 

My advice is to seek advice from online holiday forums before you waste money on issuing court claims that might not get anywhere. The Telegraph Travel expert Simon Calder is very knowledgeable about these type of issues. You might find more info online if you search,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As UncleBulgaria says, there is a European small claims process http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=URISERV%3Al16028

 

However, I'm quite clear in my mind that they have a duty to identify their principal. If they have not done so then they are liable directly. It is then up to them to invoke their indemnity protection against their principal. Also, I can imagine that if you try getting a judgement here against Hotel Beds you will suddenly find that they are prevaricating and passing the buck and you will get lost in a maze of mirrors and smoke. It will be exhausting and they will win simply because you eventually give up with fatigue.

 

As UB says, they may not be an agent – but the important thing is that on their website they hold themselves out as an agent and that's good enough.

 

This is a claim which needs making badly and against the UK agent – not against the principal. Lessons need to be taught (and may be learned). Someone needs to cut through all of the obstacles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally I can imagine that one of the reasons why they won't identify their principal at the outset is because they act for a number of different people and they're not quite sure who they're going to place your booking with yet. If that is the case then there is absolutely no doubt that your contract is directly with Love Holidays.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidentally I can imagine that one of the reasons why they won't identify their principal at the outset is because they act for a number of different people and they're not quite sure who they're going to place your booking with yet. If that is the case then there is absolutely no doubt that your contract is directly with Love Holidays.

 

 

 

But given what UB says about LH being a watertight business model - won't their own legal team simply try and tie me up in knots?

 

 

I'd obviously have to "lawyer-up" on this one - but it could become costly and a considerable risk if what UB says about their business model is pretty solid...

 

 

Wouldn't they simply deny my contract is with them? The minute I mentioned taking the matter through the courts if the response was unsatisfactory I got a very lengthy email back from LH - most of which just read like legal blurb and a whole bucket list of stuff they're apparently not responsible for.

 

 

Seems to me they've got this sewn up. Much as I'd love to stand up to the bullies of industry, I am but one man at the end of the day with very limited legal knowledge!

Edited by JesterRIP
Link to post
Share on other sites

But given what UB says about LH being a watertight business model - won't their own legal team simply try and tie me up in knots?

 

 

I'd obviously have to "lawyer-up" on this one - but it could become costly and a considerable risk if what UB says about their business model is pretty solid...

 

I am going by what has been said elsewhere. If you search Love Holiday complaints you will find many cases. If you complain enough they will give you vouchers towards another holiday without admitting any responsibility about what happened.

 

What i want to know is whether you were guaranteed the accommodation at a certain hotel without any conditions attached. Usually there are conditions where they cover their backsides.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to know what evidence there is that they run a legally watertight business model. To my mind their terms and conditions are already flawed because although they raise the issue of their agency – you have already found that they don't identify their principal.

 

I doubt very much whether an organisation like this has spent the amount of money it needs to really protect itself in every respect. I think it challenges people with lots of bluster and people back off because they are not sure of their rights and also because the amount of money at stake doesn't really make it worth their while to mount proper challenge.

 

Of course they won't ever admit responsibility for what has happened. They would be crazy to do this. But are you looking for an admission of liability? Or are you looking for a money settlement?

 

In terms of you getting a solicitor, I think that this is entirely unnecessary. Most solicitors doing this kind of work for this kind of value are complete rubbish. Most solicitors on the high Street won't understand anything or won't know anything about the law relating to agency. There simply read the terms and conditions and tell you that you have no basis for an argument – and that itself will cost you two or £300.

 

Most solicitors will simply get into sending correspondence so that the whole thing becomes protracted and drawnout and you will become alarmed about expenditure and eventually you will pull the plug on the whole thing.

 

Most solicitors don't have the ambition or the anger to fight your corner for you. I have very rarely ever met a solicitor who is prepared to get down and have a scrap.

 

You only get this kind of play-dirty attitude with big corporate firms where there is a lot of money at stake. On the high Street, there is nobody who is able to be cutthroat. That's why they're on the high Street.

If you want to do this then do it yourself – or else accept their hundred quid

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going by what has been said elsewhere. If you search Love Holiday complaints you will find many cases. If you complain enough they will give you vouchers towards another holiday without admitting any responsibility about what happened.

 

What i want to know is whether you were guaranteed the accommodation at a certain hotel without any conditions attached. Usually there are conditions where they cover their backsides.

 

 

Yes there's something in there about the occasions where accommodation is changed:

 

 

10. Changes and Cancellations by the Supplier Principal

 

We will inform you as soon as reasonably possible if the Supplier Principal needs to make a significant change to your confirmed Arrangements or to cancel them. We will also liaise between you and the Supplier Principal in relation to any alternative arrangements offered by the Supplier Principal but we will have no further liability to you.

 

 

19. Accommodation Ratings and Standards.

All ratings are as provided by the relevant Supplier Principal. These are intended to give a guide to the services and facilities you should expect from your accommodation. Standards and ratings may vary between countries, as well as between Supplier Principals. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of any ratings given.

 

 

 

Taken from their T&Cs.

 

 

Also of note is that at the bottom of the T&Cs there's a link to the T&Cs of their principle suppliers - but the list is huge and since it's impossible for you to know which you're going to be booked / paired with - how on earth are you supposed to read up before you commit?

 

 

And I don't remember having any "cooling off" period either - certainly not in the itinerary and follow up emails I received after I booked anyway. I always thought this was a given?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course they won't ever admit responsibility for what has happened. They would be crazy to do this. But are you looking for an admission of liability? Or are you looking for a money settlement?

 

 

Put simply, I want a refund for a product I purchased but they failed to deliver. They're offering 40% after an initial fob-off of 25% - plus Love Holidays offered a £50 coupon as a "gesture of goodwill" (AKA we're to blame but won't admit it because it will open the floodgates) towards my next holiday with them. Which I found extremely arrogant and presumptuous of them after my experience...

 

 

Bottom line - I didn't get what I paid for. You wouldn't go to a car showroom and accept a cheaper model for the money you paid - nor even a similar model but different colour - so why do we allow holiday companies to get away with it?

 

 

As for deceiving me, mugging me off and ruining my Christmas - an apology would suffice.

 

 

I'm not, nor ever have been part of the compensation culture. I have always however, been part of the just culture. And it really winds me up that people who have glossy "ABTA" banners and similar motifs, capitalise on that "peace of mind" appearance to promote their products - and yet when you dig into the weeds, you find such a thing is merely a label and nothing more.

 

 

Good advice on the solicitor thing. Didn't think of it like that!

Edited by JesterRIP
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hotel Beds have agreed to a full refund.

 

 

Excellent news - I am so happy.

 

 

I can't help thinking though, that the real culprits in this whole issue are the hotels themselves. Still - it was nice to receive a sincere apology.

 

 

Thanks again to BF and UB for your wisdom.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...