Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕
    • Though it would be Highview you would  pursue. DCBL are nonentities-on their best day,
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
    • Six months of conflict have also taken a heavy economic toll.View the full article
    • the Town and Country [advertisments ] Regulations 2007 are not easy to understand. Most Council planing officials don't so it's good that you found one who knows. Although he may not have been right if the rogues have not been "controlling" in the car park for that long. The time only starts when the ANPR signs go up, not how long the area has been used as a car park.   Sadly I have checked Highview out and they have been there since at least 2014 . I have looked at the BPA Code of Practice version 8 which covers 2023 and that states Re Consideration and Grace Periods 13.3 Where a parking location is one where a limited period of parking is permitted, or where drivers contract to park for a defined period and pay for that service in advance (Pay & Display), this would be considered as a parking event and a Grace Period of at least 10 minutes must be added to the end of a parking event before you issue a PCN. It then goes on to explain a bit more further down 13.5 You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is. 13.6 Neither a consideration period or a grace period are periods of free parking and there is no requirement for you to offer an additional allowance on top of a consideration or grace period. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________So you have  now only overstayed 5 minutes maximum since BPA quote a minimum of 10 minutes. And it may be that the Riverside does have a longer period perhaps because of the size of the car park? So it becomes even more incumbent on you to remember where the extra 5 minutes could be.  Were you travelling as a family with children or a disabled person where getting them in and out of the car would take longer. Was there difficulty finding a space, or having to queue to get out of the car park . Or anything else that could account for another 5 minutes  without having to claim the difference between the ANPR times and the actual times.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/Lowells Solicitors Claim form - old Orange mobile 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


mystirio
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2457 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

if any company reports more than 6 missed/late/no payment in a row

the credit file providers automatically mark the account as in default

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ok thanks for clarifiction

 

heres my witness statment I know its crap however this is the first time

i have ever done one welcome to criticism:pray:

 

In the County Court of

 

Claim number

 

Between Lowell Portfolio Holdings Ltd (Claimant)

and

xxxxxxxxxxxx (Defendant)

 

WITNESS STATMENT Of xxxxxxxxxx

 

I Being the the Defendant in the case will state as follows.

 

I hereby make this witness statement in support of my defence in the claim number

 

The claimant is a a buyer of bad or defunct debts which are bought on a mass portfolios of debts at a massed reduced cost of which the actual creditor have written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income.

 

On the 28 of February 2017 the defendant was issued with a N1SDT Claim form from the County Court Business Centre Northampton in respect of the above claim number. The defendant relies solely on the production of the particulars listed by the claimant in their particulars of the claim to defend this claim fairly.

 

In paragraph 1 the claimant refers to the agreement between the defendant and Orange under account reference number xxxxxxxxxx the claimant has yet to provide copies of the said agreement as mentioned in the claim form and under request for information of particulars of claim under C.P.R 16.5(3) .

 

In paragraph 3 the claimant refers again to the notice of assignment of the agreement and states notice given to defendant dated 10 July ,.The claimant did forward a copy of the assignment however this is formatted on a plain a4 paper with no official heading and a unrecognisable signature also there is no name printed to confirm signatures name ,states only Orange Customer Collections written beneath.

 

In paragraph 4 the claimant that that despite repeated request for payment the sum ofxxxxxxx remains due and outstanding

and the claimant claims the sum of xxxxxx

interest pursuant of s69 County Court act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to date of issue accruing at a daily rate of £xxxxxxxxxbut limited to one year being xxxxxxx

 

the claimant was put to strict proof under CPR 16.5 as to show how the sum of xxxxxxxxxx has amounted to, if the alleged amount claimed includes an early termination charge(s) of the remaining balance then OFCOM guidance states that any Early termination Charges that is made up of the entire balance if the remaining contract is unlikely to be fair to take into account the fact the provider no longer has to provide and pay for the service .

 

Noodle credit file states that the default is that the opening balance is £ 639 and default balance is £639 how does the claimant clainm the fiqure of 2380

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looking at noodle the account number is diffrent to the one lowlife state sorted the one on the sar is the same noodle one must have their own number added on

 

second attempt at Witness Statement hope this is getting there:???:

 

In the County Court of

 

Claim number

 

Between Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd (Claimant)

and

xxxxxxxxxxxx (Defendant)

 

WITNESS STATMENT Of xxxxxxxxxx

 

I Being the the Defendant in the case will state as follows.

 

I hereby make this witness statement in support of my defence in the claim number

 

The claimant is a buyer of bad or defunct debts which are bought on a mass portfolios of debts at a massed reduced cost of which the actual creditor have written off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income.

 

On [date] the defendant was issued with a N1SDT Claim form from the County Court Business Centre Northampton in respect of the above claim number. The defendant relies solely on the production of the particulars listed by the claimant in their particulars of the claim to defend this claim fairly.

 

On March the 3rd I sent a request for CPR 31.14 for the disclosure of Documents mentioned in claim form.

Bundle 1 copy of letter CPR31.14

 

I received from the claimant a Copy of the notice of assignment however this is formatted on plain a4 paper without any official heading and a unrecognisable signature also there is no name printed to confirm the persons identity only orange customer collections this document dated 10 July 2014

 

I also received letter stating that orange had sold the account to Lowell Portfolio Ltd where they refer again to Agreement number ****** this document dated also 10 July 2014.

 

I checked my credit account with noodle to clarify the amount that the claimant stated however the default amount is for £639 the claimant claim £2,218.38 plus interest court fees legal fees therefore the remainder £1579.38

Bundle 2 copy of noodle report

 

Notwithstanding the above should the alleged amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the entire balance of the remaining contract. OFCOM guidance states that any Early Termination Charge that is made up of the entire balance if the remaining contract is unlikely to be fair as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

 

The claimant has yet to supply how the amount they claim for is constructed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly no unless medically unfit

But transfer doesn't mean its going near one...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

anothe rgo get it right in the end :scared:

 

In The ######### County Court

Claim Number###########

 

 

BETWEEN

Lowells Portfolio 1 Ltd

Claimant

 

 

AND ##############

Defendant

#############

 

 

WITNESS STATEMENT OF #############

 

 

I ####### begin the Defendant in the case as follows.

 

 

I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in the claim \numbered above

 

 

1. The claimant is an Assignee a buyer of defunct or bad debts which are bought on mass portfolios

of debts at a much-reduced cost to the amount claimed and which original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income.

 

 

2. As an Assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement

on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts or otherwise acquires rights under credit agreements)it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty

to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information).The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.

 

 

3. On or around the 2nd of March 2017 .I received a claim from the County Court Business Centre Northampton ,for the amount of £2580.85 the claimant claim is for sum of £2395.85 in respect of monies owing under an alleged agreement with Orange the account reference number ############# .

 

 

4.Contained within the claimants particulars, the claimants pleads that the defendant has failed to make the required payments and the service was terminated .There is no details contained within the particulars of the claim how the sum claimed and has accrued. The claimant is put to strict proof how the sum has accrued. If the sum includes a early termination fee then OFCOM guidance states that any early termination is made up of the balance if the remaining contract is unlikely to be fair as it fails to take into account the fact the provider did no longer has to provide and pay for their service.

 

 

5.The particulars of the claim state that the agreement was assigned to the claimant Lowell Portfolio Ltd Ellington House,9 Savannah Way,Leeds,West Yorkshire,LS10 1AB.and that notice given to Defendant. The Claimant is put to strict proof to evidence the details of assignment.

 

 

6.On the 4th of March 2017 I sent a written request for documents listed under particulars of claim under CPR.31.14 Exhibit 1

 

 

7.On the 6 March 2017 I received a letter from Lowell Solicitors, P.O Box 1419, Northampton,NN2 1BU stating notice of issue of claim. Exhibit 2

 

 

8. On March the 13 I received from Lowell reply to my CPR.31.4 ! Copy of Assignment and 1 copy of documentation regarding the balance. Exhibit 3

 

 

9 The claimant plead it case as the Defendant entered into an agreement with orange under account reference ####### I am uncertain as which this account refers to. It is accepted that I have had dealings with Orange in the past however I have no recollection the account number ###### the Claimant refers to. Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to disclose this agreement/contract on which its claim relies upon and it is requested that the court compels the Claimant to disclosure pursuant to CPR 31.5.

 

 

10.Until such time the Claimant can comply and disclose the agreement/contract or provide any evidence they refer to within the particulars of the claim,pursuant to CPR 31.5 it is respectfully request that the court dismiss the claim and any relief be denied.

 

 

Statement of truth

 

 

I ########## The Defendant believe the facts stated within this Witness Statement to be true.

Edited by Andyorch
Edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I have made a few slight edits to the above.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

when is your hearing?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dates should be on your Notice of Allocation...the directions when to do what by what date ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date did you submit your DQ (Directions Questionnaire ) ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think you panicked when he got lowells one...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

true

 

i recieved a notice of transfer of proceedings dated 12 may

 

But not a Notice of Allocation?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

back again when do I send witness statment and as andy said one to sol do i send one to court

 

thanks

 

So back to your initial Q

 

You wont know until you get your Notice of Allocation :-D

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

letter today

notice of allocation of hearing

claimant to pay sum before the 19july trial fee of £170

hearing 16 august

witness statment to court/lowlife by the 16th august

 

when is the best to send after the 19 july to see if they will pay or what

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh yes!

and never file your WS first

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...