Jump to content


CapQuest "now handling T-Mobile account"


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2624 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All, new to the forum. The work you guys do is great so I've bought a webmail account to support the site how I can.

 

A family member has received a letter from CapQuest stating they've taken over their T-Mobile account.

The letter seems politely worded but not fooled going by CapQuest's reputation (I've been through several threads on the site).

 

This appears to be due to a default on a 'phone contract around 2010 I think (aftermath of the recession).

We've moved to a new house since then and they must have employed their usual methods to get in contact at the new address.

 

The first DCA was Lowells who added a default a few years after the original default and were hassling for a while then stopped.

 

It seems CapQuest have picked up the baton so to speak.

 

Nothing was paid or acknowledged with Lowells.

 

It's past six years now so are they still able to pursue this?

 

I've advised sending a Statute Barred letter but thought I should get some advice here first?

 

Thanks for any advice offered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as they are only sending phishing letters at present

and they don't actually know the correct current address

they could legally file a CCJ against the old one that the account was opened at

 

 

that you need to avoid

send the SB letter yes.

 

 

attach a copy of their letter too with it.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you don't know they've done it yes

to as an old address

 

ok would be an easy set aside being SB

 

but the set aside will cost £255

 

under FCA conc rules once told they should not then chase again

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey well done!!

keep that safe!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...