Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot Subject Access Request (SAR)


gprit
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2382 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Some years ago, Cabot acquired five credit card debts I had with BOS/Halifax/IF/Barclays/Lloyds.

This amounted to a substantial sum and was the result of 'getting my fingers burnt' in property development.

There is no entry in my Credit report for any of these amounts, or from Cabot.

 

For the past several years I have been paying an agreed £1/month on each account to Cabot, no payments missed or late.

They seem quite happy with this and don't bother me.

This amounts to the princely sum of £60 / year in reduction of the substantial debt, less whatever they spend on administration/letters etc.

 

I am almost seventy and have negotiated substantial debt write-offs with NatWest, Capital One and Tesco directly.

Cabot would not write their debts off.

 

With my sisters help I have tried to negotiate a settlement of £2000, (ok the total debt is around £40,000), but they keep saying no.

 

I have pointed out to them that if I live to 80 they will only get £600 and to 90 they will get £1200...

..and I will have no assets to leave,

but they are adament I keep paying £1/month each account.

 

I could simply keep paying this and let it die with me, but I want a 'clean sheet'.

 

I have requested a SAR within 40 days.

 

1) Assuming they respond in the timescale but do not send any signed novation agreement or original /certified copies of the original agreements bearing my signature, can they actuallly DO anything if I stop payment?

 

2) I am selling the modest house I have in the UK (no equity) and going to live with family in France. If I just leave the UK and don't give any French adress what would/could they do?

 

3) If I did either of 1 or 2 can they retrospectively place entries on my credit report?

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

" signed novation agreement "

 

Whats one of them ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send a CCA request for each debt

Me thinks you are being cash cowed

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Novation - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novation

 

I am advised by StepChange that one request will cover all accounts - that has also been confirmed by Cabot. Why do you think I am being 'cash cowed' - please explain comment.

 

Novation is not applicable to agreements covered by the CCA1974...its called an Assignment

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

firstly

its a Subject Access Request..dunno where Search came from?

 

 

2. under an sar, which to a dca is pretty much pointless, they are not obliged to send any of your agreements or whatever you asked for like the novation or the deeds.

[be careful upon what site you are following - some of these debt websites boarder on the ridiculous freeman of the land twaddle and give very dangerous and in the end costly advise]

 

 

3.your debts are very old, they all would have defaulted years ago, as such they are removed on the defaults 6th birthday, never to return [unless you let them WIN if they issue a CCJ claimform]

 

 

4. I admire your wish to clear your sheet before you pop your clogs,

but in all reality,

if these debts have been sold to debt buyers,

then have you ever wondered why??

why didn't these big multi national companies crush me in court?

why did they sell my debt off for peanuts [

 

 

probably because the debts are made up of a substantial amount of unlawful charges and or PPI and or any other insrances etc that can all be reclaimed

or that they don't hold enforceable paperwork as the account is so old, so they sell it on.

 

 

shame you didn't think about these things? before you blindly paid off you other debts already

could have saved you £1000's already...

 

 

if whomever you are currently paying cant produce enforceable signed agreements [as i'll guess every card was prior to apr 2007)

one might question why, legally you are paying them at all.

 

 

its an easier and cheaper way to clear your debts prior to death

that way your estate or assets are safe from future claims

 

 

these full and final pay offs you've made

I do hope that you have kept copies of all the signed letters from the various creditors

that say the debt is now dead and that they wont sell the remainder on to debt buyers ?

 

 

for whomever will admin your estate on that sad day

because if you haven't got those signed letters.

and they are not water tight upon sale of the partial settlement.

 

 

it could comeback and bite them after your death.

 

 

cash cowing means blindly paying debts off or blindly partially settling a debt without first checking that they are all legally enforceable first.

[stuff the morality card]

 

 

or that you are not blindly still paying a debt to a DCA that they have no legal right to even demand money upon.

 

 

hence a CCA request for EACH debt.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply. I did NOT pay off the other debts - they saw the hopelessness and wrote them all off.....and yes all letter confirmations are held safely and are watertight.

 

The debts that were sold to Cabot did NOT have unlawful charges and did NOt have any PPI.

SAR was advised by Step Change (who only advise, not manage).

 

It is a step to go through. I do not expext to see any assignment (apart from original letters from CC companies staing they had passed it to Cabot) or Novation.

 

What I DO NOT think they will produce is the original or certified true copy of the agrement that was held by the CC company...way back before 2007.

 

This is what I am trying to get answer to in my original posting. If I simply stop payments when no agreements are produced what CAN they do??

 

1) Assuming they respond in the timescale but do not send any signed novation agreement or original /certified copies of the original agreements bearing my signature, can they actuallly DO anything if I stop payment?

 

2) I am selling the modest house I have in the UK (no equity) and going to live with family in France. If I just leave the UK and don't give any French adress what would/could they do?

 

3) If I did either of 1 or 2 can they retrospectively place entries on my credit report?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1). Issue court claim against you if they think it is worth it. They sometimes do this, even if they can't get hold of CCA, in the hope of gaining default judgement as you did not defend.

 

2) issue court claim to last known UK address and win judgement by default, as you did not know about it. Not really wise to move without giving new correspondence address. If you gave a French address, i doubt you would be subject to enforcement in France if you had no means to pay. They would have to think it was worth paying French lawyers and issue proceeding in your nearest French court. Very unlikely to bother.

 

3) original creditor (OC) should have placed default, it stays on for 6 years and can be updated by any debt buyer. If the OC did not apply default in error, a debt buyer can add the default, but it must relate to original default date. If you have only ever paid token payments, the accounts were in default because you were not making the actual minimum payments required under contract.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that.

3) the OC DID place defaults on Credit file but have dropped off after 6 years. Can you clarify if Cabot CAN or CANNOT add default if I stopped paying?

 

No they can't.

 

Once 6 years has gone by and you were just making token payments, these payments are nothing to do with orginal default.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HAve received a reply from CABOT stating they are unlikely to be able to provide CC agreements within the 12 days period, but have written to original companies and would hope to do so within 40 days......

 

One interesting part of the response was that regarding my Bank of Scotland CC they are unlikELy to provide this so will no longer pursue collection of that account...

(although stating that it should not be considered written off as the debt legally remains).

 

Hope they cannot unearth the other original agreements (from around 2000-2005/6)

Link to post
Share on other sites

std response from cabot.

 

 

so cash cow accounts already being removed from the milking parlour..good job

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

std response from cabot.

 

 

so cash cow accounts already being removed from the milking parlour..good job

 

:madgrin:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.......but the agreement may not be until we see it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

follow the upload

to ONE multipage PDF please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you could upload page 3 again as its chopped off on the margin (left) we cant see the numbers.(if any)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..you need to remove your pers details

unapproved too.

 

 

follow the upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...