Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Interview under caution advice with dwp


curliesue2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2608 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all I'm new here and desperately seeking some advice. I've phone 3 local solicitors and not 1 has got back to me.

Anyway, I have received a letter from the jobcentre asking me to attend an interview under caution about my claim for income support and that they want to talk to me about a partner I live with. Now I only claim income support as I live in my own home which is a joint mortgage with my ex partner.

Now, I'm thinking this could be 1 of 2 things. Firstly I have a boyfriend who comes over and stays every now and then. He had his own place until November last year as he couldn't afford to live in a for bed house on his own so has moved to his sisters. His name is on no bills at his sisters address except his driving license and his car insurance.

 

Now the other thing I think it could be and am pretty sure it could be, is like I said I have a joint mortgage still with my ex and it's for the house I am currently living in. We sperated due to domestic violence. He was bailed to his parents address in 2015 (he didn't change his address over to there if I'm correct). Sometimes he paid the mortgage and I paid the bills and a few months I paid money into his account towards the mortgage. He tried to get me off mortgage and then tried buying me out so the bank only wanted him to pay the mortgage for xxxx amount of months and told me not to pay anything for mortgage. He met someone else in that time and moved in with her around Feb/march last year. We came to an agreement that I would stay in the house (we have a physically disabled daughter and the house is fully adapted to meet her needs) we agreed I would pay £400 a month towards mortgage into his account and the remaining £250 would be a maintenance payment but used to make up the rest of the mortgage payment.

We agreed it to be paid from his account as it's easier for it to come out as one lump payment each month and he sends me a screen shot each month.

The life insurance and home insurance are still in both our names for obvious reasons.

Any advice would be gratefully appreciated because at the moment I've got no where with any legal advice and the interview is on Tuesday morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

I've moved your thread to the main benefits section of the site because I think more people will see it. I've left you a link to follow from the HMRC forum.

 

We have people here who can advise on this, but I can't tell whether they will be on site during the weekend. If you don't get replies by tomorrow, I'll send a couple of SOSs for you.

 

From what I have seen here about IUCs, you can only go along and tell the truth. If you can back up what you say with documents, all the better. From what you've said in your first post, I can see it's a situation that can happen to someone.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the surface, because of the inter bank transactions between you and your ex partner, it will appear to the DWP that you have a partner living there, especially if your ex has never changed the address with his bank.

It would help if your ex could provide a letter stating that he no longer resides there but obviously has a financial connection because of the mortgage. He should also change address with his bank/credit companies etc.

 

As long as you can show that your situation is genuine then you should be fine.

 

You dont need a solicitor but you can have somebody present at the IUC.

 

You should take along any information/statements etc to help you show your situation.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He changed his address on everything when he moved in with his new partner.

I know for a fact he will not help me out with this. I had him arrested for assaulting me. He will not help help me with this no way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If hes already changed his address then he should be on the electoral roll at his current address which will be in your favour, i dont think thus us too much to be worried about, all easily explainable, even if he wont help you directly, the DWP can always write to him and ask him themselves.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does OP, or fellow members, think the DWP found out about this ? A snitch maybe ?

 

If the facts are true then surely a simple compliance interview would have sufficed ?

 

Could be anything - data matching possibly? If it's an IUC then there has been an investigation and evidence gathered which suggests there may be a problem with the claim.

 

If you take along what evidence you have to support what you are saying. It's your chance to give your account.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be anything - data matching possibly? If it's an IUC then there has been an investigation and evidence gathered which suggests there may be a problem with the claim.

 

If you take along what evidence you have to support what you are saying. It's your chance to give your account.

 

I've printed off all my bank statements from since we split up. I have a copy of the written agreement between my self and my ex which is also signed by a witness for each of us and I have all my paper bills with my details on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've printed off all my bank statements from since we split up. I have a copy of the written agreement between my self and my ex which is also signed by a witness for each of us and I have all my paper bills with my details on.

Perfect..

 

Sometimes questions do need to be asked but there is an innocent explanation. Sounds as if you are one of those cases.

 

Good luck. Remember neither the investigator nor the equipment bite. If you don't know something, say rather than guess.

Might help if you have a friend that can come with you,

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfect..

 

Sometimes questions do need to be asked but there is an innocent explanation. Sounds as if you are one of those cases.

 

Good luck. Remember neither the investigator nor the equipment bite. If you don't know something, say rather than guess.

Might help if you have a friend that can come with you,

I've found a police letter and letter from solicitor after another incident. I'd rather go prepared than with nothing at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went for the interview today and it was my ex as suspected. He'd been using my address with new employers while he was on bail in 2015.I showed all my evidence as and when necessary as his parents address where he was living wasn't on any of their searches but I had it on documents.

The interviewer was nice and I think he beleived me. Although he did say he was going to get intouch with my ex and ask him to go in. I told him good luck because he'll just chuck the letter in the bin. So lord knows where this will go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that if youve shown that you have nothing to hide as you have done, then i suspect that should be the end of it as far as you are concerned, save as for a letter to confirm this from DWP.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that if youve shown that you have nothing to hide as you have done, then i suspect that should be the end of it as far as you are concerned, save as for a letter to confirm this from DWP.

They said they were going to call my ex in to speak to him. That concerns me as it was a violent relationship and this could potentially start things up again between us. Which I really do not want as my children were under social services on the child protection register when the last incident hsppened. Can I emphasise this to the interviewer or maybe should I try once again with a solicitor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont need a solicitor, if you wish to emphasise your concerns then by all means do so to the interviewer but they will still attempt to contact your ex for clarification of what you have said.

I would also emphasise that he has a violent past with you and you would not wish to be named in any correspondence they have with him or referred to.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I have managed to get a letter confirming that my ex was not living with me which is what they are accusing me of. Shall I send this into them or wait to hear from them again?

Ring the investigator and ask them what they would like you to do with it.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would always advise informing tax credits of any change of curcumstance.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...