Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Universal Credit Housing Element Debacle


wavertreefox
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2653 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Guys,

 

Just after some advice regarding the housing element of Universal Credit. Its a complicated tale so ill just post the bare bones and if you need any more info i can certainly provide it.

 

I was due my payment of UC today, this was my first payment after waiting the 6 weeks odd time it takes to process ect.

 

No payment was received so contacted them and told they do not have a copy of tenancy agreement. (This has been an ongoing farce as its been posted twice and handed in at the job centre three times which apparently they can see on there system its been given in but they have not received it)

 

Adviser stated they will send payment of personal element of UC payment and housing will be by Friday paid in as long as i go to the local office and have them email it too her, notes would be left on system to say this to office staff

 

 

Went to office, told they don't do scanning, only photocopy andd post, after much back and forth agreed to email it over.

 

Payment of personal element of UC PAID in ac ! Halfway there! :wink:

 

 

Called back again to see if document has been received and has the housing element now or shortly be released for payment ?

 

Told she "could see that it had been sent again but couldn't see actual doc on system"

 

Quizzed adviser further as to why she couldn't see it on system and if this would effect the payment time?

 

Adviser went away came back and said "It could take up to ten working days to process it, she cant see it as the dept it goes to has different system, she does not deal with housing element and there is no number for claimants to call to find this out"

 

I now find myself in the situation of not knowing when payment will be, how much payment will be, if the relevant department has actually received copy of the requested doc and nobody at the service centre seems able to access a system that could give them the info.

 

Could be paid today tomorrow or any point in the next two weeks based on them not loosing the tenancy agreement AGAIN!

 

Has anyone had any experience with this or can point me in any place as to get some more solid info.

 

Thanks so much and sorry for the rather long undoubtedly tedious post.

 

Any more info / clarification/ what not, please just say!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This looks like a massive cock-up full time with all the trimmings thrown in for good measure. There appears to be several people from different offices involved and one hasn't a Scooby-Doo what the other is doing.

 

You do not say who you contacted initially but obviously that person has some idea of what's going on.

 

In the meantime, and in case there is no response or specific advice here from anyone with similar experience, it might be worth preparing a formal written complaint of maladministration and addressing it to that contact outlining the details of the treatment you have had to endure so far.

PS: No need to apologise for posting your request for information or help here. After all, That is what CAG is here for, it's what it does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI LW,

 

Thanks for your kind reply and sorry i have been slow in responding, i have been self employed as a taxi driver for a couple of weeks now and my, the hours are very very long, which is making delaying with UC service staff slightly more tricky.

 

I've taken your kind advice and registered a complaint, was amazed to see an online form and even more amazed to see I'd apparently be responded to with 2 working days of receipt! Whether this happens or not based on my previous experience I hold little hope.

 

I will be calling the service centre again tomorrow in the hope that someone somewhere has removed or even located the log jam.

I guess at the worst i'l get a listen to Vivaldi's 4 seasons hold music for three quarters of an hour!

 

Best

 

WF

Link to post
Share on other sites

used to work in a JCP office and was part of the UC team. Items handed in via an appointment for the UC service centre were copied stamped as verified true origianals and then sent via fully tracked mail to a Mail Opening Unit where it is then uploaded on to a system called DRS (Document Repository System), there is no way of the staff in the JCP uploading this directly sorry. UC Service Centre were always very strict that we could not send anything via email and it all had to go through the official channels. The fully tracked packages were sent daily and I had known significant delays in documents being sent adn I knew they had been as I was the one who physically coped and stamped the document, put it in the fully tracked envelope, completed the booklet that the TNT delivery/collection officer completed to confirm receipt and then it was delivered the following day but delays in the Mail Opening Unit meant that it could take up to 10 working days to show. I used to get quite a lot of verbal abuse over that which is why I left that job, being accused to being incompetent, lazy or a liar is not pleasant adn then being accosted and threatened during a weekend in front of my child was the final straw.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello OP,

 

The same thing happened with my Universal Credit claim in Autumn 2015.

 

The former employee at the Jobcentre already explained how things work, so sorry if I revisit what she said in my account.

 

When I set up my claim the benefits adviser put all the paperwork into the internal post to the Mail Opening Unit.

 

The call handlers are waiting for the stuff sent through the internal post to be put onto the system in order that they can process a claim.

 

I took my tenancy agreement into the Jobcentre 5 times. The greeter could vouch for me that I had presented it but for some reason it was not arriving at Wolverhampton - their MOU.

 

My theory is that when UC launched, their MOU was woefully unprepared for the amount of correspondence that would be arriving.

 

I was beginning to accrue a debt with my landlord so I rung the helpline whilst in the Jobcentre. The call handler told my work coach that she could scan and e-mail my tenancy details to her during the course of the telephone call.

 

The Jobcentre staff said they were never informed about this route - even though it is the more sensible one! The greeter told me she has had many disgruntled claimants. She misses the system where claims were handled in house due to this current confusion.

 

Within a week my housing element was now active.

 

The only problem was that the Decision Maker refused to backdate it. They held that I did not actively pursue my claim. I failed the Mandatory Reconsideration too.

 

I lodged an appeal with the Benefits Tribunal. Luckily for me, the greeter was prepared to write a supporting letter that I had been in the Jobcentre non-stop to query the whereabouts of my tenancy agreement.

 

The DWP decided not to contest the appeal and backdated my payments.

 

I was lucky that the greeter was prepared to help me but as a general rule I would encourage claimants to keep an audit trail of what they did or who they spoke to. The burden of proof is on you!

 

You did the right thing by lodging a complaint, as the mislaid documents issue will now be addressed sooner. I never thought of it at the time.

 

I thought their issues with the MOU and scanning documents were sorted by now. Clearly they are still facing them.

 

It's good the rollout of UC has been delayed. It would have been a bloodbath if they did a big bang switch over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...