Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Please provide advice on the following situation: I rented out my property to four students for 16 months until March 2024. Initially, the property was in very good condition, but now it needs extensive renovation. This includes redoing the bathroom, replacing the kitchen, removing wallpaper, and redecorating due to significant mould growth. The tenants also left their furniture on the grass, which is owned by the local authority. As a landlord, I've met all legal requirements. It seems the damage was caused by poor ventilation—windows were always closed, and heating wasn't used. There was also a bathroom leak fixed by reapplying silicone. I tried to claim insurance, but it was denied, citing tenant behaviour as the cause by looking at the photos, which isn't covered. The deposit barely covers the repair costs, or else I'll have to pursue money claims, which I've never done before and am unsure about its legal complications or costs. Any thoughts on this?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKCPS parking ticket appeals abuse


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2633 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good evening.

I am a newbie so be gentle with me please.

 

Parked in a near empty pub car park in September with my 86 year old father in law to take him to the bank and for some lunch.

 

The signs were very officious and said permission of the landlord of the public house.

The pub is empty.

We were gone maybe 40 mins

 

on return found a parking ticket on the window and a large gentleman in a very small van with "parking control" on the side watching and grinning.

 

I asked him why I had been given a ticket

he said because I wasn't showing a valid permit.

 

What and where do I get one of those?

You cant it's parking for the Co-op (nextdoor).

 

The other cars aren't displaying permits. Yes they are!

Where?

Here on the dash (pointing).

 

Two out of seven had " permits" which were black "P"'s printed on a piece of paper

- one had been written in black biro on an old envelope. Not happy!

 

Appealed in a couple of days in writing to UKCPS

 

heard nothing till the 20th of December when I was sent a final demand letter for £100 to be paid within fourteen days or court action will be taken.

 

I called and spoke to a very aggressive rude lady who told me they had sent a letter turning down my appeal and I had not responded.

I never received a letter.

 

She said it was my fault I had not received it and that I should "pay up or else"! I finished the call.

 

 

I then sent a letter to the only Director of UKCPS a Mr Deegan to his home address stating the way I had been treated and asked him to sort this mess out.

 

I sent it by post to be signed for and traceable.

The post office could not get a signature and left a card.

 

Where now please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there was a ticket on your car, then you do nothing until the NTK comes through the post. It has to come within a certain timeframe, and UKCPS never get it right. Ever.

 

You also are doing things wrong by going to the director. Theres a procedure to follow and its very easy to get this put away for good.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sit tight and the regulars will be around.

 

There are some VERY knowledgeable people on here.

 

Youll get the help you need.

 

As youve seen, UKCPS arent exactly professional.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

AS you have appealed as the driver then they dont have to issue a NTK.

Now you have given them your name and address they can continue to harass you for ever and a day.

 

Most of these people are lucky to have a job and not be relaxing at her majesty's pleasure so that is why you get rude responses from them, they are not in a business where honesty is their byword.

 

In the future do not engage in any conversation with their operative and do not acknowledge a ticket on your car, you wait for them to issue a NTK through the post.

 

Even then you do not respond, come here and show us the offending paperwork and we will advise the best way of dealing with it.

 

As for this one, you are going to have to do some homework.

We need to see the ticket slapped on your car and photographs of the signs where you parked.

If there is more than 1 sign a picture of each different type is required.

 

Also, understand why you were there is irrelevant so although you may get sympathy that doesnt change the law.

 

When in the army I had an officer tell me when I was being beasted for something that wasnt my doing that the only place I would find sympathy was in the dictionary between **** and syphillis..

Edited by dx100uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been trying to create a url for these documents for nearly two hours but can't work out how to do it.

 

I can copy and paste all day long.

I can scan,download and do all the basics

but I am a business owner and not a whiz with IT.

Is there any other way to put them on here at at all.....?

Regards Mr Frustrated!!!!!!!!!

 

The details are as follows:-

6/9/2016 received PCN.

 

Within a couple of days appealed to them pointing out their shortcomings as the sign said (I have pictures) by permission of the management of the chase public house which is unoccupied.

 

The carpark had 7 vehicles in and was less than a quarter full.

 

I have pictures of the signs,

the so called permits

and can take any other pics that are required.

 

there is a way you can suggest to get the images you require to you then just let me know.

Sorry for being dull

Carefulman

Link to post
Share on other sites

as a PDF please [pop them all in one multipage PDF]

 

 

follow the UPLOAD

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...