Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi   With a SAR all you have to do is ask for 'ALL DATA' (this way it does not matter what format they hold that data whether it be digital, email, telephone calls (recorded), written etc).   They then have 30 Days to comply once they have acknowledged your SAR Request (that is unless they require ID Verification) which the 30 Days time limit does not start until they have verified your ID if requested)   Also can I add in DHL response in post#36 I hate it when any Company/Business etc. has the nerve to use the get out clause of 'Human Error'.    This is not the case as it was 'Maladministration' by DHL' not 'Human Error' as stated to you, irrespective of who/which employee of DHL made the 'Human Error' the buck stops with DHL as who/which employee made that error was Employed by DHL.
    • pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual  note the long gateway number given  then log in .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked   goto the defence filing section  file the following:     1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  . If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. .  3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. .. ..ends..   dx          
    • I passed on the article and link to friend. Between us we will now try get the required info to the correct location so that they (whoever in the Govt) can sort out what he is owed. I will keep you updated.  This thread may help others in similar situations. Ethel Street - very helpful research.  Thank you.  Seems like you came up trumps!
    • numerous erudio/drydens claimform threads here already - use our search top right.   your appears to be statute barred as you've never heard of erudio so would not have deferred since your last direct deferment to SLC in 2013    if you wish to bother to even send CCA/CPR that's upto you but the bottom line is to erudio you've ignored everything to date yoy might also ignore a claimform.   but ofcourse you are not!!   if the above is true   pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform. [if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] .  register as an individual  note the long gateway number given  then log in .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform .  defend all  leave jurisdiction unticked   goto the defence filing section  file the following: 1 The Claimant's claim was issued on (insert date).  2 The Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980.  . If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant. .  3 The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £[insert figure from their POC]  or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied. .. ..ends..   dx      
    • Well I would want my £50 back also but hey ho if your satisfied its been resolved.....there was no way you could ever be liable anyway as your contract was with TC not RC.   Thread title updated.   Andy
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1108 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Today 07/01/2017 my partner and i had a visit from a marston holdings bailiff demanding payment from my partners daughter who no longer lives with us and is not on electoral register and proceeded to show him our tenancy agreement and that she has not lived here for over four years since going to university.

 

None of us at the address is named on the so called court order which he would not confirm also we have not had any notice that any enforcement agent would be visiting.

 

As the person on the enforcement notice was not in residence

we informed him that he was allowed to demand payment or remove goods he was insistent to the point of bullying saying he had the right to do what he wants and seize any cars or goods

 

my partner and her second daughter and her granddaughter 8 years was getting upset frightened and angry still he would not go and my partner was at the point of handing over her cameras to him until he said he would allow 10% of what they cost new

 

to which i got angry and insisted he leave but he was fueling an disagreement between my partner and i to the point i angrily and under duress i paid on my credit card.

 

This agent had proof that she no longer lived at this address and turns out no longer owned the car and was paying said penalty notice.

 

Take note Marston's agents do not take notice of their legal limitations and will do anything to take money off innocent people we did not incur the debt but will hound anyone to get payment.:mad2::mad2:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do a section 75 immediately.

Hopefully you got some of his behaviour on film, which will support the prompt report that you should do to the police for harassment /fraud/ threatening behaviour.

Insist that a local copper takes statements from all people presents, including minors.

They've got to stop this!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have any more visits from anyone, then you should record what is said either in audio or video – although it is worth doing it without appearing to be provocative.

 

Do you know if this Agent was using a body worn video?

 

Was the granddaughter present and did she see it all? Did you draw her distress to the attention of the agent?

 

I see that you have a Hotmail email address. Many of our automatically generated emails go to the spam boxes in the Hotmail system. Please can you make sure that you white list us – or else check your spam box regularly.

 

It would be helpful if you would contact me directly by email on our admin email address. Thank you


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Today 07/01/2017 my partner and i had a visit from a marston holdings bailiff demanding payment from my partners daughter who no longer lives with us and is not on electoral register and proceeded to show him our tenancy agreement and that she has not lived here for over four years since going to university.

 

under duress i paid on my credit card.

 

This agent had proof that she no longer lived at this address and turns out no longer owned the car and was paying said penalty notice.

 

Am I right to assume that this debt relates to an unpaid penalty charge notice?

 

If so, there should have been quite a few previous notices from the local authority. These would have been a Notice to Owner....a Charge Certificate....and an Order for Recovery? There should have also been a Notice of Enforcement from Marston Group. What happened to these letters?

 

Do you have any idea when the road traffic contravention occurred?

 

Does your partners daughter still have a vehicle registered at the address?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

trouble is BA the EA will say it iis the address and not the person to get the amount owed.

Proof of the residents should have been enough.

This only seems to be the case when it suits the EA.

Agree about the notificatio, but if addressed to the OP's daughter then it is not for them to open only forward on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to agree with Leakie, the EA doesn't care who pays, debtor or third party, just so long as someone anyone does.


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...