Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Post House Sale Completion - Problem


PW11L
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2653 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Greetings All,

 

Been a fan of the forum for several years and kudos to the site team and members for all the great resources on here.

 

I'm hoping someone can profer some advice re an issue I'm having with the gentleman that purchased my house late November.

 

As mentioned above completed the sale of my home late November 2016, prior to the sale the property was rented, although tenant moved out prior to completion and I am living with my partner.

 

Problem is I indicated that fixtures and fittings were not included in the sale, i.e. beds, fridge, washing machine etc.

 

I personally was awaiting the funds from completion to enable me move the leftover items straight to storage and shipment abroad as I am relocating..

 

Completion happened and I had to travel abroad immediately for a family issue and I immediately called the buyer who I had met and he told me he had collected spare keys from my estate agent and I should agree with him when I was ready to attend the property to remove my belongings.

 

As I returned to the UK I made several call to said buyer and he ignored several calls and text and eventually agreed to grant me access on the 15th of December 2016 for proposed removal.

 

When I arrived at the property I was given access by his builder for 5 mins but they claimed to have lost the shed keys where I also had items in. I was told to break the shed door by the builder but was hesitant to do so without new owners consent.

 

I called said buyer as I exited the property and explained above to him and also reminded him that fittings, fridge , washing machine etc not included in the sale.

 

Long and short of it is he has ignored and avoided my calls since that day and I have been unable to get any of my belongings.

He answered my call once this week to tell me a tenant was to move in this week and he will call me re stuff in the shed but is being evasive re other stuff and trying to say I never collected them.

 

Question please is what legal recourse I have and best suggestions in resolving this situation. I have tried to communicate with him civilly to no avail.

 

Thank-you.

 

Pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to your first post!

 

Ideally, you would resolve this with the buyer. The next step is probably to contact him in writing (email or letter) saying that you require access to the property to collect your goods and suggesting some suitable times. Ask him to get back to you by the end of the week with confirmation of a time for collection.

 

You should ensure that you start putting things in writing rather than just relying on phone calls. It is almost impossible to prove what was said in a phone call if you end up having to take legal action. If you do speak over the phone, consider recording the conversation.

 

Ultimately, if you cannot resolve this with the buyer, you would need to send him a 'letter before action' and if that doesn't work raise a county court claim against him. You could consider seeking an order for the return of the goods themselves, or a money judgment for what you estimate the goods are worth. If you want to take legal action you'd have to check that it is pretty clear from the sale documents what was included and was not included in the sale.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank-you @steampowered for your welcome and detailed advice.

 

Appreciate you and the community here.

 

Will proceed as you have advised and pray for an amicable resolution and just regret that it had to turn out this way.

 

Can never get my head round why people choose to behave so dishonourably.

 

Thank -you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Greetings All,

 

Been a fan of the forum for several years and kudos to the site team and members for all the great resources on here.

 

I'm hoping someone can profer some advice re an issue I'm having with the gentleman that purchased my house late November.

 

As mentioned above completed the sale of my home late November 2016, prior to the sale the property was rented, although tenant moved out prior to completion and I am living with my partner.

 

Problem is I indicated that fixtures and fittings were not included in the sale, i.e. beds, fridge, washing machine etc.

 

I personally was awaiting the funds from completion to enable me move the leftover items straight to storage and shipment abroad as I am relocating..

 

Completion happened and I had to travel abroad immediately for a family issue and I immediately called the buyer who I had met and he told me he had collected spare keys from my estate agent and I should agree with him when I was ready to attend the property to remove my belongings.

 

As I returned to the UK I made several call to said buyer and he ignored several calls and text and eventually agreed to grant me access on the 15th of December 2016 for proposed removal.

 

When I arrived at the property I was given access by his builder for 5 mins but they claimed to have lost the shed keys where I also had items in. I was told to break the shed door by the builder but was hesitant to do so without new owners consent.

 

I called said buyer as I exited the property and explained above to him and also reminded him that fittings, fridge , washing machine etc not included in the sale.

 

Long and short of it is he has ignored and avoided my calls since that day and I have been unable to get any of my belongings.

He answered my call once this week to tell me a tenant was to move in this week and he will call me re stuff in the shed but is being evasive re other stuff and trying to say I never collected them.

 

Question please is what legal recourse I have and best suggestions in resolving this situation. I have tried to communicate with him civilly to no avail.

 

Thank-you.

 

Pete

 

Yet, the purchaser was entitled to 'vacant possession' of the property.

 

They aren't entitled to keep your items, but equally, you aren't entitled to leave them there for the purchaser to store for you, free of charge!.

 

Did you agree the storage of the items with the buyer, and if so, on what terms?.

If not, have they sent you any notification of their intent?.

 

You refer to "fixtures and fittings". Fixtures get sold with the property : it isn't as simple as "if it is fixed to the land, it is a fixture, and sold with the property", but that is the staring point in law ; if it is permanently attached to the land, it is "annexed".

 

Fittings (or more properly 'chattels') don't pass with the property.

If an item is in doubt, it is usually specified during the conveyancing .....

beds, fridge, carpets, white goods (though not white goods that have become fixed, e.g. as part of a fitted kitchen!) would usually be chattels, and not pass to the property's buyer (but they equally aren't obliged to store them for you!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with bazza.

Unless you have a clear, unequivocal proof that he allowed you to "store" your property after sale completion, he could dispose of all of it and even charge you for it.

You must have filled a "fixture & fittings" schedule in the process of selling the house, so if white goods are not included in that document, technically they're still yours, unless of course he has disposed of them.

Empting the shed is another matter and I suspect that anything you'll find missing (usually small tools) are lost forever.

Got to say, you've been very unlucky to have a family emergency right when you had to clear the house, so if all is lost it will only be down to bad luck (and dishonesty from new LL)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with bazza.

Unless you have a clear, unequivocal proof that he allowed you to "store" your property after sale completion, he could dispose of all of it and even charge you for it.

 

They can't just "dispose of it all", at least not without formalities including warning the OP, but they have no obligation to store the items once they have complied with the formalities.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can't just "dispose of it all", at least not without formalities including warning the OP, but they have no obligation to store the items once they have complied with the formalities.....

 

They're supposed to get a vacant property on completion, anything left there would have to be considered rubbish, unless clearly written somewhere.

A couple of years ago I helped a friend moving and in the new house we found loft and shed full of stuff.

We contacted the estate agent and they said they would come back to us within an hour, they didn't.

Couple of days later, after many calls to estate agent and other party solicitor we hired a skip and filled it up to the rim.

My friend billed the other party via the solicitor and then it transpired that those were their most precious belongings.

To cut the long story short they eventually backed off despite threatening legal action and paid for the skip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're supposed to get a vacant property on completion, anything left there would have to be considered rubbish, unless clearly written somewhere.

A couple of years ago I helped a friend moving and in the new house we found loft and shed full of stuff.

We contacted the estate agent and they said they would come back to us within an hour, they didn't.

Couple of days later, after many calls to estate agent and other party solicitor we hired a skip and filled it up to the rim.

My friend billed the other party via the solicitor and then it transpired that those were their most precious belongings.

To cut the long story short they eventually backed off despite threatening legal action and paid for the skip.

 

You got lucky. You could have been prosecuted for theft (disposing of them is a a form of appropriation, and clearly intends to permanently deprive the owner of them : it would hinge on how much notice was given / how much effort was made as to whether there was dishonest intent under Ghosh), but, even if not to the criminal standard you could have been sued for interference with goods.

 

The following is slanted towards LL's having T's goods left at the end of a tenancy, but the same principle ('involuntary bailee') applies.

 

http://www.landlordlegalsolutions.co.uk/cms/document/Guide_to_tenants_possessions_left_at_property__LLS_.pdf

There is a process to go through to protect yourself : in this OP's case the buyer can dispose of the goods, but only by following a process, and if the OP is trying to get their goods back, the buyer can't dispose of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A house must be fully cleared of all personal possessions and rubbish by the day of completion...unless a pre agreed arrangement is in place with the buyers conveyancer and the buyer himself.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

A house must be fully cleared of all personal possessions and rubbish by the day of completion...unless a pre agreed arrangement is in place with the buyers conveyancer and the buyer himself.

 

Absolutely: vacant possession (which has already been referred to).

 

However, this thread is about the implications (for both seller & purchaser!) when vacant possession doesn't happen and chattels / possessions are left behind ........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely: vacant possession (which has already been referred to).

 

However, this thread is about the implications (for both seller & purchaser!) when vacant possession doesn't happen and chattels / possessions are left behind ........

 

Yes I am aware of what the thread relates to and the problem the OP faces...but with the above in mind anything here on is and upward struggle..because it wasn't adhered to.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Frankly if I was the new LL having to clear someone else's rubbish along valuable goods I would just put everything in a skip and when asked say: "I got vacant possession of the property as stipulated in the contract of sale"

Bye, bye family jewels and 14th century display cabinet...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank-you @ All for the thoughtful reply's.

 

I'm contacting my Solicitor today to send of a letter to the buyer's Solicitor.

 

Long and short of it is he's continued to deliberately avoid my calls with the intention of holding on to property's such as fridge, beds and washer /dryer (not fitted).

 

My main concern as stated in first post is items in the loft shed which are my personal belongings.

 

Very Best Rgds

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately unless you made formal arrangements prior to completion everything left behind is the new owners property as that what completion means. You will know that the removal men collect stuff in the morning and wont set foot in the new property until they get the OK from the estate agent that it has all gone through Ownership transferrs at a precise time and as it is with vacant possession that doesnt mean absolutely stripped bare, it means you have no further claim on anything there other than agreed in the contracts you drew up at the beginning of the process.That applies to anything buried in the ground, left in the attic or wherever. I know you had spoken to him but that really doesnt create much of an obligation without definite dates agreed by both sides.

Involuntary bailee law doesnt apply, that is items left at a place under a previous contract such as a suit at a dry cleaners or items in a rented property where the tenant is invited to bring their own stuff to the premises. effectively you have ABANDONED the property and you have no law to protect you.

All you can do is to be nice about it or you will find that you are throwing good money after bad. Your solicitor will probably be happy to charge you to send a letter but wont be happy to go futher than that. I would make sure that the stuff could be shifted in 1 go on an agreed day. that day will be at the convenience of the new owner but dont be surprised if it had gone to the dump, it has been 2 months and you have not shown any great urgency to the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...