Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • As per my old and new posts all correspondences have now ceased from all parties hence me raising issue again.   If defaulted in January 2018, surely I should have been notified?    
    • Hi   I received a NIP for traveling 39mph in a 30 zone (mobile speed camera) in December 2020. As it is my offence, the police sent a letter requesting to know who was driving with three possible outcomes: speed awareness course, 3 points of contest at court. I provided my details and sent the form off.    The police sent me a letter this week asking for confirmation of my insurance... I realised that in October 2020 I removed a private number plate off the vehicle and notified the DVLA and the V5 form but I didn't norify my insurers.    I called the insurance company today and updated my number plate and they said technically I was insured and the vehicle was insured and it depends on how linient the police will be.    I am just concerned as the recent letter states possible prosecution for driving with out insurance with a possible fine and 6 to 8 points.    If they add that to the original 3 I might be given that would be 11 for a first offence.    Has anyone got any experience on this or any advice as I am pretty worried!    Thanks 
    • Tend to agree Hammy, but I think if you have a number of DD's going through every month and the reference/descriptions does not clearly identify what it is for, then many people would not have queried it.   How many people still go through their Bank statements regularly to check every item. ?  I have mobile Banking now and keep an eye on the payments going through, but when I had printed statements sent, i only checked them every few months.   Normally for Insurance refunds in these situation, the Insurers should consider refunds of up to 6 years, if it can be evidenced that the Insurance was of no value.  e.g. the Insurance was for a specific risk which is no longer owned.   The DD was set up over the phone as a variable DD amount and the Insurers should have issued communications about increases to the email or postal address provided for this purpose.  When the DD was set up originally D&G would have had to send confirmation of the DD terms and rights of cancellation etc.  You can try to ask Natwest for a refund under DD scheme, but you may struggle with this.    Ask D&G to look at your refund request again as a complaint and advise that if not settled, you will ask the FOS to review.  D&G would be charged a fee by the FOS if you went that far, so they may try to offer you a refund amount, to avoid this.
    • The state-backed savings giant has been accused of abandoning older customers in its drive to axe prize warrants to save money and paper by only consulting customers with an email about the change. View the full article
    • Savers who put £10,000 in the average tax-free cash Isa ten years ago would now have £9,772, new research shows. This is because inflation has outstripped the interest earned on savings. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1483 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys

just looking for some guidance and advice please.

 

My mother-in-law passed away middle of 2016.

My wife and her brother are named as excutors on the will

(which was collected from her solicitors).

 

My wife has taken the lead role in dealing with her estate.

The majority of the estate has been left to her with monies being left to grand children, only a few personal items left to her brother.

 

He was given up for adoption and only reappeared on the scene 12 years ago.

He had stated early on that he didn't want anything leaving to him as he was already set up for life kind of thing, even though money was left to his son.

 

My wife applied for probate in her name and requested power reserved for him as she needs to sell the house which has been left to her.

 

He is now saying that she has being acting fraudulently on the probate application because he hadn't signed anything.

 

He also seems to think there is another will, the will we have is lodged with probate.

We can honestly say that we have never found a more up to date will.

He has stated that he has researchers looking for a second will.

 

please can someone advise us, my wife is in total bits at the moment regarding this.

 

Also, we need to amend the details submitted to probate as we have now come across further assets.

 

Does anyone know what we need to do regarding this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the brother agree (either verbally or in writing) that he was happy to have powers reserved ?

If not, then he may well have grounds for a complaint, but to state that it was fraudulent is taking it a bit far without knowing the details & background.

 

How old is the original will ?

 

It could be that there is a more recent one, but if your wife has taken all reasonable steps to check, then she does not need to worry too much. The probate forms (and subsequent oath) only require the facts are accurate to the best of her knowledge.

 

As for the additional assets, would the value take the total above the Inheritance Tax threshold ?

If not, a quick phone call to the Probate Registry to ask for their advice would be in order. If the sums involved are relatively small, they may well say "don't worry about it".

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

Quote
No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I'm sorry to hear about your problems. It's never easy being an executor, your wife has my sympathies.

 

For what it's worth, children adopted out of the family don't have any right to inherit as I understand it. I guess this could be why the guy is hoping there's another will.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks guys for you input.

 

 

when my applied for probate she spoke to the district probate office, she was advised to change his side to powered reserved. She wouldn't have to seek his consent as he was aware she was applying for letters of administration.

 

 

regarding the value of the estate, we have found other assets and money totalling around 40K this would only value the estate at 120k therefore way under the tax threshold, just don't want probate kicking off

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last one I was involved with which was similar Probate Office sent me a form for the named executor wishing to opt out to sign ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes we sent a form because originally he didn't want to act as executor, but said he wanted to stay at the last minute. So advised for power reserved. Now probate has been granted to my wife he is kicking off. She needed to apply because she wants to sell the house she has been left.

Link to post
Share on other sites
The last one I was involved with which was similar Probate Office sent me a form for the named executor wishing to opt out to sign ?

AFAIK that is only applicable to executors who wish to renounce their executorship entirely, whereas no signature is required for power reserved.

Link to post
Share on other sites
AFAIK that is only applicable to executors who wish to renounce their executorship entirely, whereas no signature is required for power reserved.

 

Okay.....so....

 

"My wife applied for probate in her name and requested power reserved for him as she needs to sell the house which has been left to her."

Why apply in her name only not joint and why was power reserved ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Power reserved just means the other executor(s) carry out probate without the power reserveds signature. The OPs wife has not done anything wrong. If her brother is not happy, he can apply for double probate meaning both will have to prove the Will. As for using researchers to find another Will, it sounds like he clutching at straws. The MIL solicitor has provided the last known Will and all he needs to do is check if there's another one lodged at the probate registry, this is an easy task. If I was the OPs wife I would ask the PR myself and ask the solicitor to provide written confirmation that they hold no other Will.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
regarding the value of the estate, we have found other assets and money totalling around 40K this would only value the estate at 120k therefore way under the tax threshold, just don't want probate kicking off

 

In my (limited) experience, I have found the Probate Registry to be quite helpful. As you are well under the threshold, HMRC wouldn't be interested (and they would be the ones to "kick off" if there was an issue). If you speak to the PR, they may well advise penning the new figures in on the relevant form and initialising it when the oath is sworn.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

Quote
No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...