Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I feel that people are focusing too much on the OPs property being a council house and putting responsibility on the council to resolve this.   imagine for a moment that the OPs house is privately owned, now what powers would they have to take action on the trees? Pretty much none without taking the tree owner to court right. Well as the trees are privately owned, that is the same power that the council have right now.   the information with the £375 will be inline with high hedges legislation as this will be the only power the council will have and it is common for there to be a charge for this.   this is not a social housing issue, but a neighbor dispute with a private homeowner.   i used to work as a tree officer for a local authority and from experience have seen that people’s idea of dangerous and what is actually dangerous are two different issues. A councils power to enforce tree works are also limited and will usually only be where a private tree poses a risk to the highway, not to another property as that is a civil matter (even where the council own the 2nd property).    With regards to risk to underground pipes, this is something you will be unlikely to successfully argue as various studies have found that unless a tree is planted on top of the pipe and crush it, the roots will not cause damage, but rather only enter through already damaged areas as they are opportunistic, any tree roots in drains are usually a secondary issue where a pipe had existing damage and to resolve it will require a permanent repair to the pipe to prevent recurrence.   the only options i see here are to calculate the height allowed under high hedges legislation (it varies depending on what direction the property faces , the location of hedges etc) and try to enforce that which will involve the fee. Otherwise there is little you can do as the private homeowner has a right to have trees in their garden although they may be liable if they were to cause damage to your property (such as a shed) or the councils property in the future.
    • Served on 16 Feb.   On reviewing the MCOL website today for an updated, I noticed that 1) Hermes has aknowledged the claim, but not yet filed a defence, and 2) that I there was a glitch / error on the form. Essentially, it looks like I had accidentally left the "I will send detailed particulars of claim" box ticke (I thought I had unticked it), with the result that the claim section has been truncated, and some extra text has automatcially been added - in red below):   "...Claimant seeks £XXX, plus I will provide the defendant with separate detailed particulars within 14 days after service of the claim form. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of..."   This is obviously not ideal. Is it better to try to amend the claim somehow, or to just submit a brief POC that a) clarifies that I am seeking £XXX plus costs (which was automatically truncated), and b) sets out my calculation of the £XXX?  
    • Hi   It amazes me how they pass the buck as they don't want to deal with a private homeowner but if the shoe was on the other foot they would be hammering down on you for breach of tenancy.   As this is council housing you need to make a Formal Complaint in writing to the Council Housing about this (as a social housing landlord they have a complaints process they have to follow). you need to exhaust their complaints process. Make sure and title your letter Formal Complaint.   From what you have posted this tree is not just a nuisance but also a Health & Safety risk:   1. The tree being overgrown is now a danger to the occupants/Guest/Visitors to your property   2. The tree has overgrown into the Council Housings Boundaries your property causing damage/endangerment to the occupants/guest/visitors.   3. As the roots of the tree are also overgrown into your property you have concerns that these may be causing/damaging to any underground pipework that may be within the boundray of the property.   4. So far the Councils actions have been to treat their Council Housing tenant as a third class citizen with a private homeowner aloud to cause endangerment/possible damage due to these overgrown trees which are encroaching on your council house property/bounderies.   You also require clarification why you were sent the Healthy Neighbourhood Information which states I have to pay £375 to make a complaint. (make sure and attach a copy of the response that states this cost)   You also require copies of the following:   1. Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Customer Service Standard (not the leaflet) 3. Health & Safety Policy (not the leaflet) 4. Public Liability Insurance Policy. (not the leaflet) 5. Clarification from you if their is any underground pipeworks running through the bounderies within the garden area (you should have full knowledge of this it being your property/plans) 6. Compensation Policy (not the leaaflet) 7. Equality & Diversity Policy (not the leaflet)   When you get the above policies sit with a pen/pencil/highlighter and take you time reading them and just think to yourself 'DID THEY DO THAT' if not mark it then leave it for a while then do the same again this way you can basically throw/write back stating the haven't followed x policy with which part of that policy and your reason. (you are building evidence to use against them using their own policies. I would also like to refer you to The Local Government (Miscellaneous Provision) Act 1976: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1976/57/part/I/crossheading/dangerous-trees-and-excavations     You need to remember yes it is the Council but the Council Housing is a separate entity and is a Registered Social Landlord (RSL)   Is the Council Housing classed as a registered Charity? (what is their registration number whether charity or RSL?)   Also have a wee look at this CAG link:     
    • @rocky_sharma   Fame at last!!   Dunno how much help it would be in your case, but I could try digging out the txt of my defence if you think it might be relevant to your defence. We might hafta do this via PM, then e-mail though if ya wanna go down that route.   Good luck with yours anyway mate.
  • Our picks

holyjoemuttley

CCJ against Northampton Autosports now Performance Trade Centre - Can i Transfer the CCJ?

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I haven't had to use the forum for a while as when I did the advice and guidance I received was fantastic and resolved my problem.

 

However, new year, new problem! :)

 

I took a company to court last year and won the case! :)

The problem is that the company closed down the business and opened again next door and under a new name.

 

 

I contacted the sheriff's office and a local solicitor to be told that I can transfer the debt but I must find out the owner's name of both companies.

 

 

I've tried and tried to get it, but as it's not a limited company I can't get the name of the owners and nobody I contact will give me it (due to data protection).

 

Can you help/advise how I can get this and what I should do? Do you need any other info from me?

 

Any help gratefully received.

 

Best Regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Bazooka Boo,

 

I've just checked and neither their old name or their new name come up with anything. They've obviously been trading under a different name to the actual company name and no reference to this has been or is mentioned on their paperwork or website.

 

It's a car company of which I reported to the HMRC as I noticed they don't give their VAT number on their invoices.

 

It seems they've been trading like this for years.

 

Any ideas how to proceed?

 

Regards

 

Holy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

then its p'haps time to name names

 

 

dx


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, who are they?


Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When you sued these people originally, was it definitely a limited company (or PLC or LLP) that you listed as the defendant?


Card 1 - Charges reclaim £464 + Interest...ongoing

Card 2 - Charges reclaim £520 + Interest...ongoing

Card 3 - Charges reclaim £396 + £1179 Imterest **WON**

Card 4 - Charges reclaim £296 + £147 Interest **WON**

------------------------------------------------------------

4 x CCA requests

1 received.....Blank Application Form

1 received.....Terms & Conditions

1 received.....Sent agreement relating to a previous card :confused:

1 response....Have lost the agreement :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are other possibilities where the liability might be limited: such as a limited partnership.

 

The other possibilities are where the business is owned by an individual (sole trader) or individuals (a partnership), where the liability remains with the individuals even if the business has ceased trading.

 

OP : you may need to reveal what information you have so far ........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

The company (originally) was Northampton Autosports.

I believe they are now trading (2 doors down :) ) as Performance Trade Centre in Northampton.

 

I viewed the car I bought from the 'new' unit

they said they were in the middle of moving into.

 

I contacted Biz Space who they rent from,

but they gave me the 'data protection' quote.

 

I've even asked Biz Space where they stand with companies operating illegally out of their units,

but received no reply so I presume Biz Space don't care as long as the rent gets paid.

 

When I sued Northampton Autosports I only had the name that was above the door and on the invoice so I could only sue them with that.

 

They wouldn't give their personal names and no other personal names were on any business cards or documents.

 

The question about it being a limited company..

.... I didn't believe, and I'm sure it wasn't, limited.

 

Regards

 

Holy

Edited by holyjoemuttley

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both companies are required (if sole trader or partnerships) to have the owner(s) details on display at their premises, and on invoices / receipts

 

https://www.businesscompanion.info/en/quick-guides/business-information-other/company-and-business-names#PART1Soletraderspartnerships

 

The legislation behind this being:

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/part/41/chapter/2

 

Get trading standards to visit the active garage, if they aren't compliant.

The problem is linking the previous firm you have the CCJ against to an individual.

Did that firm lodge any documents with the court (AoS, defence, witness statement), and if so whose details were on that?

 

If you get that link, send in the HCEOs with the documentation linking the current firm to the one you have the CCJ against (if the sum is sufficient for HCEOs)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum.

 

Andy


We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers BazzaS,

 

That's good info.

 

There were no names on any paperwork and nothing was visible in the office. Because people I contact wont give me any names due to data protection then I'm stuck. Maybe when contacting Trading Standards they can give me that info??

 

Sorry, what's HCEO?

 

Regards

 

Holy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

High Court Enforcement Officers

[will cost you £60]


please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HCEO is High Court Enforcement Officer.

(With the right paperwork!) they can turn up at a business (gaining entry by force if required!), giving them a chance to pay, and if they don't pay seize goods to secure the debt.

 

You'd need to link the 2 businesses.

 

I suggest you get the details for Northampton Autosports from:

http://www.internetters.co.uk/whois_search.php,

assuming that the webpage for that company is northamptonautosports.co.uk

a now defunct website.

 

Do so, and then save a copy of the info as it may disappear (it certainly expires 4th Feb 2017)

 

Relevant dates:

Registered on: 04-Feb-2011

Expiry date: 04-Feb-2017

Last updated: 20-Jan-2015

 

Of course, the Registrant, Miss SB, may not be the owner of the company, or it may be a website for a different "northampton autosports" ;

 

if I get the chance to use one of the 'wayback' machines to check what the website said when it was active I'll do so.

 

Miss SB of Market Harborough is listed as:

Registrant type: UK Sole Trader

The other business's website has registrant listed as the company:

Registrant: Performance Trade Centre

Registrant type: Unknown

Registrant's address: UNIT 3 BUSINESS CENTRE, KINGSFIELD WAY KINGS HEATH INDUSTRIAL ESTATE NORTHAMPTON NN5 7QN United Kingdom

Data validation: Nominet was not able to match the registrant's name and/or address against a 3rd party source on 24-Jun-2016

 

And while that might not be unlawful (I'm not sure regarding that!), their website doesn't make it clear who is trading as "Performance Trade Centre", and if the details aren't clearly visible within their place of business : Trading Standards.

 

Speak to TS anyway, others may have had similar problems with Northampton Autosports (and check for other CCJs?, using Trust Online), and you can highlight the lack of owner's details for Performance Trade Centre

 

Again, your aim is to establish sufficient linkage (by the individual owning the firms) to allow enforcement for your CCJ against the firm currently trading, or against that individual.

 

Performance Trade Centre are on AutoTrader. Would it be worth highlighting to AutoTrader (on 0330 303 9001, or emailing [problem]@autotrader.co.uk) that their website doesn't give the owner's details (nor do they do at their bricks and mortar site).

 

You might also ask if autotrader have any details for Northampton Autosports, or might be willing to supply them to TS (assuming N Autosports also used autotrader??)

 

EDIT: The review on Autotrader for Performance Trade Centre has URL text for northampton autosports! :

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/services/car-dealers/uk/east-midlands/northamptonshire/northampton/northampton-autosports-northampton-dpp-10000688/reviews/true?sort=reviewrelevancedesc

 

Can autotrader confirm a link between the two businesses, either to you or Trading Standards?

 

The wayback machine at https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.northamptonautosports.co.uk shows for Oct 1st 2106 a redirection from Northamptonautosports.co.uk to .performancetradecentre.co.uk ......

 

I'm not saying they were written by the same person, but Performance Trade Centre's website message seems vaguely familiar (or altered from a copy of Northampton Autosports .....)

 

"If you are looking for great savings on quality used cars in the Northampton area, then you have reached the right place. Performance Trade Centre are a specialist used car dealer based in Northamptonshire.

 

We are proud to offer you a first class customer service and very competitive pricing, so please browse our stock list.

 

At Performance Trade Centre, we stock a range of used cars to suit all budgets and lifestyles so we are sure to have the right car for you.

 

If you are looking for a second hand car in Northampton, then don't delay, call us today. In order to offer cars to suit everyone we make sure that we update our stocklist regularly.

 

It is therefore always worth giving us a call, even if you don't see what you are looking for on our website.

 

We offer advice on vehicles and vehicle maintenance and our friendly staff will go the extra mile to guarantee that you receive the advice and support you need.

 

At Performance Trade Centre we don't just sell cars, we do everything possible to get you on the road with your perfect vehicle. Why not come along to our dealership in Northampton? We look forward to meeting you!"

 

and

 

"If you are looking for great savings on quality used cars in the Northampton area , then you have reached the right place. Northampton Autosports are a specialist used car dealer based in Northamptonshire .

 

We are proud to offer you a first class customer service and very competitive pricing, so please browse our stock list.

 

At Northampton Autosports we stock a range of used cars to suit all budgets and lifestyles so we are sure to have the right car for you.

 

If you are looking for a second hand car in Northampton , then don't delay, call us today to book a test drive. In order to offer cars to suit everyone we make sure that we update our stocklist regularly.

 

It is therefore always worth giving us a call, even if you don't see what you are looking for on our website.

 

We realise that buying a car can be a daunting experience, but don't worry, we are well established within the Northampton area and come with a great reputation.

 

Furthermore we offer excellent advice and experience on vehicles and vehicle maintenance. Our friendly staff will go the extra mile to guarantee that you receive the advice you need. This is the reason why many of our customers keep coming back to us.

 

At Northampton Autosports we don't just sell cars, we do everything possible to get you driving your perfect car. Why not come along to our dealership in Northampton? We look forward to meeting you!

 

Fellow CAG'ers : what do you feel regarding the odds of success of an application to the court to get the CCJ against Northampton Autosports altered to include Performance Car Centre, and then sending in the HCEOs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BazzaS, you're a star! But not being au fait with legal things it'll take me a while to digest and understand all this :)

 

I forgot to answer the following question: "Did that firm lodge any documents with the court (AoS, defence, witness statement), and if so whose details were on that?"

 

They didn't and I presume they chose to ignore all communications, but someone did sign for the letters I sent.

 

Regards

 

Holy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Screen grab showing the wayback machine doing the website redirection between the 2 different sites .....

 

so, 2 options (strike that, make it 3):

1) go the trading standards route, or

2) go the "prove it yourself that the two companies are owned by the same entity), or

 

3) a hybrid : see if TS can identify the individual behind one (or both!) of the business(es)

 

Risk to options 1 (and 3): TS may not do anything, or may alert (by their inquiries) the latest business that you are after them.

 

Risk to option 2: the court may decide you don't have sufficient evidence to link the 2 businesses to allow the CCJ to be enforceable against the latest one.

 

Ohh, and a possible further avenue for information gathering : Northampton autosports are/were on LinkedIn ?

2017-01-04_14-27-24 1.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In legal terms, there are really only two possibilities. The first possibility is that you sue an individual. The second possibility is that you sue a registered company, which would have a registered name on Companies House. There is no such thing as an unregistered company.

 

The definitive website for looking up companies is https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/. If you can find the company name on there, you can look at the company's latest annual return for free to see who the directors and shareholders are.

 

I can't find any company details for Northampton Autosport. If there is no registered company that means there is no such thing as a company "Northampton Autosport". If so, your claim is legally against the individuals who were trading as "Northampton Autosport". If those individuals have moved their business down the road and changed the name, that doesn't matter, in legal terms your claim is against the individuals who run the business and that claim is not affected just because they changed the name of their business.

 

I'm not convinced there would be any point amending your CCJ from "Northampton Autosports" to "Performance Trade Centre". It sounds like neither of those names exist as companies. Though I suppose it would help if the bailiffs think a CCJ against the "Performance Trade Centre" would let them go on the premises even though there is no such company with that name.

 

I suppose the problem you have is that you don't know who the individuals are. Do you have their bank account details on the invoice? If they are still using the same account, you could try to get a "Third Party Debt Order" which is basically enforcing your CCJ over the account.

 

You could also seek a court order requiring BizSpace to disclose information about the business to you but you might be liable for BizSpace's out of pocket costs and legal fees if you do that.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What if the individual is unknown but it can be shown that the individual trading as Northampton autosports is also trading as Performance trade centre ..

 

 

... does the individual have to be named directly for enforcement to be made against the second business,

if the court allows the second business to be named in the amended CCJ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is no limited company set-up, there is no legal distinction between the "individual" and the "business".

The assets of the business would legally belong to the individual.

 

I'm not 100% sure a CCJ against a company which doesn't exist is valid.

If the bailiffs are happy to go ahead and enforce even though there is no company registered

, and the individual can't be identified,

perhaps you can get the name changed,

though an application to court would need to be made which means a fee of £255.

 

Definitely one to ask the bailiffs about.

 

Could also try searching against their VAT reg number if there is a VAT number on the invoice?


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WOW!!

 

I'm feeling quite positive over this :)

 

Please excuse me if I come across as being naive.... but I am! :)

 

I've just sent an email to Autotrader requesting the info as suggested by BazzaS so I'll let you know the response when I have it.

 

In regard to steampowered's question regarding names/accounts on invoices etc......nothing. Plus it was a cash sale (dozy, I know! :) )

 

I sincerely appreciate your help guys!

 

When I contacted the Sheriff's Office they said I could transfer the CCJ between a company and an individual. The issue for them/me was there was no name.

 

Only when I contacted Citizens Advice did I notice that there was no VAT number on the invoice which I immediately reported to the HMRC. What they did with that info I wasn't informed.

 

Regs

 

Holy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm guilty of using 'company' and 'business' interchangeably, where it is probably better to stick to 'business', as it seems Northampton Autosports was a business, not a 'company' per se (well, definately not a limited company or LLP needing to be registered at Companies House).

 

Although the business may not exist any longer, the CCJ is against the individual(s) who was/were the business (or partnership), through that business, and that won't 'die' with the 'death' of that business.

 

The ongoing issue is them not being named. Seek advice from HCEOs on if the information you have is enough for enforcement against the 2nd business / the likelyhood of getting the CCJ amended to cover the 2nd business

on the basis of the 2 businesses not being limited companies and (likely) having the same owner even if Mr/Mrs/Miss X's name isn't known.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When I contacted the Sheriff's Office they said I could transfer the CCJ between a company and an individual. The issue for them/me was there was no name.

This is the difficulty. As BazzaS points out, this isn't a case of transferring a CCJ between a company and an individual. In fact there is no company.

 

Definitely one for the HCEOs as to whether they can enforce simply against a business name.


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How to deal with the 'sorry mate, data protection' fob off

 

DPA1998 Section 32, subsection 2, para (a) and/or (b)


I don't always believe what I say, I'm just playing Devils Advocate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...