Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

G24 Parking 'Fine' of £100 for overstaying by 23 minutes - Homebase, New Malden


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2662 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I received a NTK (or "contractural parking charge notice" as the letter states) from G24 stating my car overstayed by the two hour car park limit by 23 minutes.

The 'fine' is £100 reduced to £60 if paid by the 4th of January.

 

Details of the NTK below

however as we only received the notice in the post yesterday i need to act on this pretty quickly.

 

I haven't been back to the car park however from looking upon street view there is a sign at the car park entrance stating

"120 minutes free parking charges apply thereafter see signs for conditions".

 

i would like to appeal

just not sure I have sufficient ground to do so.

 

My partner was shopping in home base,

made some purchases and had even purchased food in their cafe.

 

She was with our 1 year old baby and had to feed and change which prolonged the stay.

 

I will contact the home base store manager and complain about the excessive charge

 

however any advice on how to respond to G24 would be greatly predicated

 

Thanks in advance

 

1 Date of the infringement -15th December 2016

2 Date on the NTK -21st December 2016

3 Date received -29th December 2016

 

4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? Yes

 

5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? - yes anpr of car entering and exiting car park

6 Have you appealed? Not yet

 

7 Who is the parking company? G24

 

8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Homebase, 229-253, Kingston road, new Malden, kt3 3ru

does it say which appeals body they operate under. G24 operate under the IAS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as per your thread title

can you please clarify where they have used the word FINE

 

 

is used on their paperwork?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good first mistake hurdle over...

have removed that word......

 

 

2nd is you haven't yet received the letter entitled Notice To Keeper have you?

as this is an ANPR capture its 29-56 days the time limits on that if my brain is still functioning correctly?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no my brain was fuzzled..

 

 

The parking co must sned out the NTK within 12 days after the date of the alleged breach and it has to arrive on your doorstep within 14 days so they get 2 days for service.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well nothing to panic about.

 

 

await the knowledgeable ones over the day .

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

As this was an ANPR capture, (no windscreen ticket) the NTK must arrive within 14 days of the event. With windscreen tickets it is the 29-56 days mentioned.

 

I also looked on Street View and the image taken was from July 2015 so the signs may have changed since then. If they haven't then it would be very hard for them to enforce.

 

I think a revisit is required to get up to date pictures of the signs.

 

Unfortunately, G24 are members of the IPC so while you may wish to appeal to them, it is likely to be pointless as they reject all appeals. The IPC also run the Independant Appeals Service (IAS) and they are not known for their fair treatment. In fact, the total opposite. Also, The people that run the IPC and the IAS run Gladstones Solicitors, the 'go to' company for any court action they may wish to take.

 

Fortunately, G24 have taken no one to court in the last 3 years so it is likely they won't bother with you (NO guarantees of course)

 

I suggest you stick to the plan and contact Homebase direct and complain to them.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

the law gives the parking co 14 days to get the NTK into your hands starting with the day after the date of the event.

 

This means that they have just scraped through on this so they can claim keeper liability if the rest of their claim stacks up

 

HOWEVER, IAS members rarely use the right wording and generally do not rely on the POFA to create a keeper liability because the people who run the IAS tell them that a pice of case law that is irrelevant and outdated circumvents the more recent applicable legislation.

 

It doesnt

so post up the NTK with personal details removed like your name, car reg and their refernce number and we will see if their paperwork is valid for POPFA.

 

If it isnt then it is easly to decide what to do, if it is correct then we will need to see the signage where your car was and then advise what to do next.

 

In the meanwhile do not contact them at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is the NTK

Well, as far as I can tell, they are not relying on PoFA so they can only go after the driver, not the keeper. You do not have to tell them who was driving at the time. It is up to them to do so but of course, they don't know.

IF they did try this on in a court room, they would have to prove who was the driver, not just assume it was you.

 

While I would say ignore, you may wish to appeal. If you choose to do so, never name the driver. Always say 'The Driver', never 'I'. As in

 

" The driver was feeding a hungry baby and as such was prevented from leaving within the time stipulated." Of course they will say that it is not enough grounds to cancel as it is not in their financial interest to do so.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

the NTK is compliant with the POFA to create a keeper liability so signt of the signage would be required to see if you were offered a binding contract to breach.

 

Also you can ask the local council if G24 have planning permission for their signage under the advertising hoardings regs of the Town and Country Planning Act 2007.

 

This is usually something they dont bother with because they are either cheapskates and dont want to pay or they are ignorant of the law and rely on no-one else knowing it better.

 

Come back with images of the signs there and we will advise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All, happy new year!

 

I managed to visit the homebase car park and have attached photos of the sign installed at the car park entrance and also signs attached to the anprs and installed in various places around the car park.

 

I also checked the kingston upon thames planning database and there are no planning consents for the signage.

 

the cut off date for the reduced charge of £60 is the 4th however if there is a valid argument to not paying it i would prefer to go down that route.

 

Thanks

Rob

IMG_7940.jpg

IMG_7943.jpg

IMG_7944.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

essentially they are breaking the law by having their signage there and you cannot enter into a criminal contract with them, even if you wanted to.

 

Also the signage is an "invitation to treat" so you dont have to accept the contract offered by the other signage if you dont want to.

 

Up to you

, the parking co isnt going to agree with you and just say never mind

 

, they will tell lies and threaten you with all manner of evils

so it is then down to how strong willed you are as to whether to give up and enrich them now or fight it and be prepared for a long drawn out battle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

syou now have to follw procedures.

 

 

the first step is to appeal to the parking co.

This should be somehting simple like

"The keeper of the vehicle xx00yyy believes that G24 does not have the authority to enter into contracts with anyone at the site that is the subject of their claim.

 

 

I put it to strict proof of such permissions that are necessary such as sight of the contract with the landowner and the planning permission granted to allow the signs to be present"

 

they will rely with some waffle about it all being commercailly confidential and that you must accept their word they arent really breaking the law but they should also give you a POPLA code when rejecting this appeal (even though it isnt really an appeal).

 

 

You can then appeal to POPLA on the same grounds plus the argument that it is not an offer of a contract anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then that is a way forward. write out a covering letter if you wish to use this and ask that she respond in writing. the parking co will then be without a leg to stand on.

So ,

Dera Ms Manager, I am writing to take up your offer to cancel the parking charge ref aabbcc and enclose a copy of my purchase receipt/bank statement that covers the event. I would be obliged if you now get this charge cancelled as promised and let me know that it has been action by emailing me at or by post at

Link to post
Share on other sites

good, we like the simple solutions best.

 

Too right. This saves our failing grey cells as well.

 

Keep that email safe just in case G24 keep trying it on.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...