Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Servis gas cooker from studio 24 gone faulty - servis won't come out unless supply gas safe number !


2ltr16valve
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2667 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bought a new cooker through a catalogue (studio24) in the beginning of November 16. So far the cooker (oven) has gone out twice while cooking roast dinners, there is no indication or light to show it's gone out. The only time you find out is when you go to get your cooked food out and find out it's not cook throughly.

The last time was Christmas Day which ruined Christmas dinner . !!

 

I called servis today who out right refused to book an engineer unless I provide the gas safe number of the person who installed it .... now the person who installed it is out the country until the 3rd Jan. I don't have a certificate as he's a mate, and didn't charge me.

 

I've said to servis, what is the issue as your engineer will have to re-certificate the appliance once he has repaired it or condemn it if he can not repair it.

 

But apparently it's to ensure their engineers safety, which I can kind of understand - if it was installed incorrectly but what does providing a gas safe number prove ?? Nowt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can look up his registration number online and give it to them.

If he isnt registered then you are both breaking the law so had better get someone who is registered to look at it and sign the installation off pronto.

 

 

Assuming he is registered and you can find his number then you should be telling the people to bring another cooker with them when the engineer calls as if this one isnt fixed you are rejecting it under the Slae of goods Act as amended.

 

 

(law says you have to let them try and fix fault but doesnt say you have to let them fidlle with it for evermore so on chance or replacement/money back)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes correct the retailer

Else you've no leg to stand on

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

under the CRA

your claim is against the retailer

nothing to do with the manu

though I bet studio24 try to fob you off too them!

 

 

has this cooker gone faulty within 30 days [even better within 14 days]

and have you proof you informed 'someone' in writing.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah I understand what you mean now :)

 

Only notified Servis today as the first working day since Christmas,

I thought the first time was just unlucky

- but the fact its done it again and on Christmas day - ruining Christmas dinner :( had enough

 

thought id book servis to come out and check it for a fault,

 

ive contacted servis as Studio24 dont have engineers or anything and send you to the manufacturer...... in the whole they are pretty useless to be fair.

 

Been trying for 2 hours to get through to Studio24 on the phone and gave up as have ill baby at home whos been in and out of hospital since christmas day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the bottom line is they own the goods

its on HP

 

so if you had a hire car that broke down

would you pay for it if you couldn't drive it

 

 

I think not!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well well well.

 

The wife finally got through to studio yesterday who said someone will call her back within 7 days.

 

Today a lady calls and says she can give us the number to book an engineer with Servis .... the wife passed the phone to me.

 

I told her I have no desire to deal with servis as the contract is with them,

the goods are under 6 months old so as far as the law is concerned the fault was present at manufacturer.

 

She said that it's past 30 days therefore we have to have an engineer out to fix it - or confirm its knackered.

 

We told them we don't want it fixed we want it replaced,

that a gas cooker should never go out during cooking unless the gas supply fails.

Which clearly is not the case.

 

She said she's going round in circles and will pass it to a manager..... so still waiting!!

 

I did say that Unless they are going to change the item a rejection letter will be in the post shortly.

 

Where do we stand now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get them to book the ruddy eng

Its their oven

 

You can't reject the goods outside of 30 days

Or dictate. What action the retailer takes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we have to let them fix a 6 week old oven ?

Really do not feel safe with a dodgy gas cooker from the factory :( what if something else goes wrong later ?

 

Servis are now demanding proof of purchase emailed to them before they will book an engineer !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

might not be the cooker

could be as simple as a gas pressure issue

 

the flame sensor may not be getting hot due to low pressure [thus not in the flame]

which is something your fitter mate should have checked.

 

 

and yes ofcourse they are entitled to see proof of purchase

finance agreement scan will do

or studio statement?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

might not be the cooker

could be as simple as a gas pressure issue

 

the flame sensor may not be getting hot due to low pressure [thus not in the flame]

which is something your fitter mate should have checked.

 

 

and yes ofcourse they are entitled to see proof of purchase

finance agreement scan will do

or studio statement?

 

Trouble we have is the studio statements are rubbish, they don't show the actual item - just the price and a code.

 

The gas pressure is okay, is tested regular with boiler servicing etc as well as at install.

They did mention on the phone thermo something to do with the flame sensor needing adjustment. So something they seem to know about.

 

Going to have to try contact studio again now to get them to send proof that servis will take :(

 

I'm sure the regs say this should be at the least inconvenience to the customer ! Not looking that way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...