Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow Global/Restons Sols unaware CCJs


NDLOVINI1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2671 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello and thanks for the good work.

 

I have two CCJs issued against me in October 2016.

 

I owed debts to Arrow Global who subsequently got Restons Solicitors on board.

The latter managed to get CCJs and have applied for a Charging order on my property.

 

I received threats and abuse from Restons so gave up talking to them.

Then I was contacted by Land registry saying a Charging order application had been received..

 

I read a few forums and then checked Trust on line only to find I did indeed have two CCJs .

Restons managed to get the court to issue CCJs without my knowledge .

 

They were awarded three times the original debts.

I have asked the court for copies of the claim and judgment but got no response.

 

Restons got CCJs issued by the court against me.

The court never contacted me.

Anyone had a similar experience ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi NDLOVINI1 and Welcome to CAG

 

I have started your own thread here in the Financial Legal Issues...please continue to post here.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and thank you very much.

I have read many threads on line and have concluded that the set aside does not apply.

Why, because I have lived in this address for close to 15 years and never moved.

 

I have no proof that I never received correspondence regarding ( the claim forms and judgment forms).

 

Many, suggest that the only acceptable reason should be a legal one

eg the debt is not mine and I can prove it or that the debt is mine but has already been paid in full.

 

I have read somewhere and noted with horror that 'either the creditor or the court can be tasked with serving the debtor with court claim forms'.

If that is so, then I am sure Restons deliberately ensured I didn't get the forms in order to get a judgment favourable to them.

If I had the knowledge that they were planning such a move

I would have stopped them on their tracks by challenging them,

(agreeing to part of the claim £1200 not the £3200, they claimed and was awarded).

 

How did they convince the court that the best and most effective way of dealing with me was by issuing default ccjs ( forthwith) not bothering to inform me.:-x:x

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok we need to gather some details.

well you do.

 

you need to ring northants bulk court

[but they are currently closed till the new year.]

and request copies of both CCJ

you'll need to quote the numbers too

 

well need to know about the 2 debts too please

 

as you might well have a good reason already to set aside the CCJ's as you say you've not moved in 15yrs

so that's the first hurdle done.

but

you'll need a viable defence for the actual debts mind.

 

so tell us all you know about the debts.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx100uk

 

I have tried to contact Northants court but their phones are perpetually engaged.

 

 

I have emailed them a record 5 times and have written them but all was in vain.

I always put the case numbers as they appear on Trust on line.

 

 

The Set aside route is too expensive and much less productive.

Chances of winning are very slim.

How do I convince the judge that I never received claim forms?

 

I have applied for a variation via form N245 requesting the court to allow me to pay affordable amounts not the £3269 claimed and awarded to Restons solicitors (forthwith).

 

Now Restons are threatening further enforcement even though they have made a Charging order on my property.:mad2::!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

northants are closed until the new year

restons will threaten everything under the sun

they always do

esp on debts that they know if you scratch the surface

they don't hold water legally.

 

 

let them willy wave

you don't have to convince the judge

they do.

 

 

tell us about the debts

do you know their history please

what they are

who from

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

" I have applied for a variation via form N245 requesting the court to allow me to pay affordable amounts not the £3269 claimed and awarded to Restons solicitors (forthwith) "

 

The N245 only allows a change from forthwith to monthly affordable payment...it does not change the judgment amount so you will still be paying £3269...albeit very slowly :-)

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy

My approach might not be the most sensible but may surely prove to be the less stressful.

 

Restons managed somehow to get the court to issue me with ccjs.

As far as the court is concerned, I was ordered to pay £3369 on 05/10/16. which I didn't, so ten days later Restons went back to the court and applied for a Charging order on my house.

 

It is only now I have knowledge of the ccjs.

I owe a third of the amount but will have to pay what the court has ordered.

 

I have done much research on the N244, set aside its too expensive and much less likely to succeed.

 

The argument Restons are using, is that I have disobeyed a court order.

In the eyes of the court, that is true.

 

The fact that I only became aware of what was happening, on 20/12/16 when Land Registry informed me of a Charging order is not a strong enough argument.

 

I have offered £100 a month but Restons will have none of it.

They want the full amount as ordered by default.

£100 is not affordable but I have to be serious as this is now part of my mortgage payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You did get notification of the Interim Order by Land Registry ?...was you aware that they they were executing the judgements further?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

northants are closed until the new year

restons will threaten everything under the sun

they always do

esp on debts that they know if you scratch the surface

they don't hold water legally.

 

let them willy wave

you don't have to convince the judge

they do.

 

tell us about the debts

do you know their history please

what they are

who from

 

Restons are a tough bunch.

They managed to find that I had a mortgage, hence property.

They want payment in full as initially ordered by the court.

 

The debts were £255 owed to Vanquis which has astronomically been raised to £960 by Restons.

 

The other was £700 owed to Sainsbury card, now £2269

 

I lost my job in 2011 and sussequently stopped all credit card, loans etc

 

These debts now belong to Arrow Global, who have since unleashed their blood hounds, RESTONS.

 

They got ccjs issued without my involvement

( how, I just can't figure out ).

 

Knowing that I was not aware,

moved foward and made a Charging order application, securing the debt on my house. They are making threats about further enforcement action.

 

You did get notification of the Interim Order by Land Registry ?...was you aware that they they were executing the judgements further?

 

yes I got notification from Land Registry.

 

Neither Restons nor the court felt the need to keep me informed.

 

Everything was clandestinely done

Strange I should say!

 

Next stage,

since they are threatening further enforcement,

two or more routes to take.

 

Either go for a final Charging order and force me to sell or just get the bailiffs in and turn everything upside down.

 

Restons have written to me stating that as I am in breach of a court order, they are considering further enforcement action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I got notification from Land Registry.

Neither Restons nor the court felt the need to keep me informed.

Everything was clandestinely done

Strange I should say!

Next stage, since they are threatening further enforcement, two or more routes to take.

Either go for a final Charging order and force me to sell or just get the bailiffs in and turn everything upside down.

Restons have written to me stating that as I am in breach of a court order, they are considering further enforcement action.

 

 

Have you got a copy of the original Claim Form?

 

What address is on it?

 

Seems odd that you received the Land Registry letters but not the Court letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got a copy of the original Claim Form?

 

What address is on it?

 

Seems odd that you received the Land Registry letters but not the Court letters.

 

Never got the claim forms,

still awaiting the court to send me copies of the claims.

 

It is odd indeed.

That is my dilemma,

all other mail reached me but claim and judgment forms didn't!

 

My conclusion is that they were never sent

 

Restons submitted claims,

were tasked with sending me a copy but didn't,

then went back to court for a default judgment

Thats the only explanation I have come up with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which is a wrong assumption...

 

Restons do not send you the claim forms. The court does (MCOL)

 

And the fact that you are falling perfectly for restons willy waving makes you their perfect target for more willy waving

 

Its a civil debt

Bailiffs have no right of entry at all

And they won't ever get a sale order on your home either

 

Sounds to me you either been talking on the phone to them

Or

You've entered into pointless letter tennis and restons have senced you are a mug that awaits fleecing blind

 

You need to standup to restons

And they will soon back down

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then the court was deliberately given a wrong address by Restons.

 

A charging order means Restons mean business

 

I need to take action and be quick

 

It was a civil debt as you say but its now a secured debt.

 

I have made them aware that 'Law is law, the same for everybody'

 

They can make whatever move and I will use the same court to stop them on their tracks.

 

When the worst comes I will get a solicitor to fight my corner as well ie if they apply for Order for Sale

Link to post
Share on other sites

no a charging order is what reston do when they can get away with it uncontested.

when they know they've found a mug to fleece

 

get the CCJ's set aaside and the CO also get nulled.

and this worry over this supposed mystical order of sale you seem worried about goes too

 

 

me thinks you've either been talking on the phone

or reading too many horror stories.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell us about the two debts please

original creditors

what type of credit

when you took them out

when you last paid.

 

you really need to concentrate on getting these dealt with

rather than keep biting your nails upon what might possibly happen

and worrying about all the lies restons told you over the phone.

 

if you can prove cabot/the original creditors/any other dca new your current address

then i'd be asking rectums to set aside the lot by mutual consent FOC to you.

 

that resets everything and costs you nothing.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You seem convinced going down the 'set aside route' is best will yield best results.

 

Have you had a similar experience and succeeded?

All forums I have read state its a complicated process and judges are reluctant to reverse court decision regardless of the fact it was automatic.

 

Contrary to what you say, setting aside is very costly, you complete form N244 costing £255

 

What I want to do is stop Rectums where they are but they keep trying to creep forward and i have to use the court to stop them.

 

They have threatened to take further enforcement action but I replied yesterday quoting what the court letter says

ie no further action can be taken whilst the matter is being considered by the court.'

 

Rectums are unpredictable,

they managed to fool the court,

by-pass me and got CCJs issued.

They wanted a Charging Order.

 

Since they are threatening further enforcement action I should take them seriously.

I just hope they will keep me informed rather than going behind my back, getting a 'Warrant of control' and I get a visit from bailiffs.

 

Am dealing with the courts now

so hope the court will keep me in the loop.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are 100's here that have suffered the same as you

But your case is diff

You 100% know all the letters and claim forms must have been sent to a bogus address as you say you've lived there for 15yrs

 

100% guaranteed set aside

 

But you keep going on about and worrying about what might happen

 

Stop faffin around

Tell us about the debts as asked 4 times now...

 

Have you rung the court yet and got copies of the ccj's coming to you?

 

If you can prove skullduggery rectums might well set aside by consent free of charge to you

 

But you must get/tell us the info we want

 

Not keep withering on and wasting time!!!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What documents/letters have you so far from arrows or restons

Scan them up to PDF please

And tell us about the two debts

Full history please

 

 

follow the UPLOAD

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...