Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Private Gumtree sale dispute as seller, not sure what to do


Notreblenotreble
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2673 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone. I really am in a pickle with a private sale.

 

I recently sold a hifi through gumtree for the sun if £250, a pretty top end one that was new and in the box. It was an unwanted gift, so I sold it on. It was advertised as being as new, and came with a warranty card and and unused.

 

A girl messaged me through gumtree and came and saw it, and handed over the cash. A week later she phoned me to say the warranty couldn't be setup as they didn't have the original invoice. I had some hassle getting it but did.

 

A week later again I got a phone call to say her and her boyfriend couldn't get the warranty to validate so they wanted to return it. I told them it has been inspected before sale and the warranty isn't my problem. I hadn't advertised one. I systematically said I wasn't issuing a refund and this wasn't my problem. I didn't have the money to refund anyway however I felt this was a bit over the top.

 

I got a letter two days ago citing some rules for retailers, that I had apparently broken, and the latter now claims I had Miss sold the item due to some kind of discrepancy in the name.

 

 

This was never mentioned before, and I hadn't actually advertised it as such.

They said I'd sold it as a Bose, when it wasn't).

 

the letter gave me 14 days to reply and i signed for it when it arrived.

I don't think I'm in the wrong here but I suspect this is going to small claims court.

 

 

She also had two policemen she was 'friends' with apparently knock on my door to ask me (politely actually) to give her money back.

They did admit it was a civil issue but I'm feeling very pressured here to buckle.

 

What do I do?

I have the original copy of the advert that proves I didn't missell it.

Do I reply to the letter or am I best leaving it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to her and tell her that you will be happy to defend any claim in a court of law.

If you get another police officer at your door, take their collar number and report them to the ipcc for harassment.

Of course tell them that it is a civil matter.

Police love claiming that everything is a civil matter, so do the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

As this is a private sale, 'Caveat Emptor' applies. This means 'Let the buyer beware' In a lot of cases a warranty is non transferable anyway however this has nothing to do with the goods. You sold the HiFi, not the warranty. Even if it blew up tomorrow, they would have no comeback other than trying the courts.

 

They can cite whatever rules about retailers as they like. they don't apply to private sales. Period!

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tend to agree with the above. Normally these things are covered under consumer protection laws such as the Sale of Goods Act and Consumer Rights Act.

 

These will not apply unless you misrepresented the goods but even then, this is a private, not commercial sale.

 

As long as no misrepresentation took place on your behalf you have no legal duty to provide a refund

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I don't believe I missold it.

 

The whole complaint was surrounding the warranty, and my advert only said that the card was included in the sale.

All the other complaints only turned up later in this letter, when it seems they really wanted to push me for a refund.

 

They also complained that I had told them verbally It had cost £280,

when in fact when I supplied them with the receipt (out of the goodness of my heart it seemed) it was for £250.

My mistake with that, as it was a gift from my son, but I don't see how this is even relevant.

 

Should I reply to this letter then as it sets a deadline?

If I don't reply would it be derogatory to me if they take it to small claims court?

 

I do feel better about it after reading your above replies and I really appreciate them.

I just feel this letter was a springboard to a next step.

It seems more formal now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore them. Completely. There is absolutely NOTHING they can do. They can send as many letters as they want. Again, nothing they can ever do.,

Notice how they cite retailer law and rules? Guess what. Youre not a retailer. Youre a private seller. They obviously regret the pruchase and are looking to push the blame on to you by lying.

 

If you feel like contacting them, tell them youre more than willing to see it through to the end and show them lying to the court if theyre dumb enough to take it that far.

 

If they phone again, hang up on them, or record the call.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

it the letter titled 'letter before Action'?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it the letter titled 'letter before Action'?

 

 

dx

 

Hello, no it does not have a title. It's just a letter that says I have 14 days to issue then a refund. I think I'm going to ignore it. If it goes to small claims court I'll add my responses to everything then. I have evidence of the original advert so I think I'm ok.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...